• 대한치과기공학회지
• /
• 제34권2호
• /
• pp.67-73
• /
• 2012

연구 목적: 임플란트의 하부구조를 상부 구조와 연결하는 레진시멘트의 접착강도를 높이기 위한 기계적 화학적인 표면처리 방법들이 연구 되고 있다. 이 연구에서 다양한 크기의 $Al_2O_3$ sandblasting과 Silano Pen으로 표면처리한 티타늄과 레진 시멘트의 접착강도를 알아보고자 한다. 연구 방법: 12개의 티타늄(Ti-6A1-4V)시편을 디스크 형태로 제작하여 자가중합 수지에 매립하였다. 이들을 각각 6개의 군으로 나누어 $50{\mu}m$, $90{\mu}m$, $110{\mu}m$ 등 3가지 크기의 $Al_2O_3$로 sandblasting 하는 조건과 $Al_2O_3$로 sandblasting한 후 Silano Pen(Bredent, bredent GmbH &Co.KG, Senden, Germany)을 사용한 군으로 나누었다. 표면처리 한 티타늄 표면에 레진시멘트(Duolink dual syringe, Bisco, USA)으로 접착하였다. 그 후 증류수($37^{\circ}C$)에 24시간 보관 후 접착강도 실험을 시행하였고, SEM을 사용하여 표면처리 한 표면과 접착강도 실험 후 파절양상을 관찰하였다. 결과: 통계학적 분석에 따르면 Silano Pen을 사용하여 표면처리한 군들의 접착강도가 높았다(P<0.05). 결론: Silano Pen을 사용하는 것이 티타늄과 레진시멘트의 접착강도를 증가 시킨다.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제49권1호
• /
• pp.49-56
• /
• 2011

연구 목적: 최근 지르코니아가 전부도재관의 코어로 많이 사용되고 있다. 지르코니아와 레진 시멘트의 결합 강도를 높이기 위한 기계적, 화학적인 표면 처리 방법들이 연구되고 있다. 이 연구에서 여러 표면 처리 방법에 따른 지르코니아와 레진 시멘트의 전단결합강도를 알아보고자 한다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 80개의 지르코니아 (Lava, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) 시편과 80개의 지르코니아/알루미나 복합체 (Zirace, Acucera Co Inc, Korea) 시편을 디스크형태로 제작하여 에폭시레진에 매립하였다. 이들을 각각 4개의 군으로 나누어 $50\;{\mu}m$ $Al_2O_3$ sandblasting, $110\;{\mu}m$ $Al_2O_3$ sandblasting, $50\;{\mu}m$ $Al_2O_3$ sandblasting과 프라이머 (Z-PRIME Plus, Bisco Inc, Schaumburg, IL, USA) 사용, $110\;{\mu}m$ $Al_2O_3$ sandblasting과 프라이머 (Z-PRIME Plus) 사용 군으로 나누었다. 표면 처리한 지르코니아 표면에 2가지 레진 시멘 (Calibra, Panavia F)으로 접착하였다. 그 후 증류수 ($37^{\circ}C$)에 24시간 보관 후 전단 결합 강도 실험을 시행하였고, SEM을 사용하여 표면 처리한 표면과 전단강도 실험 후 파절양상을 관찰하였다. 결과: ANOVA분석에 따르면, 두 가지 종류의 시편 모두에서, 프라이머 (Z-PRIME Plus)를 사용하여 표면 처리한 군들이 전단 결합 강도가 높았다 (P < .05). 결론: 기계적 결합 강도와 함께 새로운 프라이머를 사용하는 것이 지르코니아와 레진 시멘트의 접착 강도를 증가시킨다.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제13권4호
• /
• pp.237-245
• /
• 2021

PURPOSE. This study aimed to compare the microshear bond strength (µSBS) of dual-cure resin cement in CAD-CAM zirconia after different cleaning techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fifty discs of zirconia-based ceramic from Ivoclar Vivadent were embedded in acrylic resin. The discs were divided into five groups according to the cleaning methods used: Group 1: drying with spraying + sandblasting with Al₂O₃; Group 2: washed with water and dried with spraying + sandblasting with Al₂O₃;Group 3: washed with distilled water and dried with spraying + sandblasting with Al₂O₃ + zirconium oxide (Ivoclean); Group 4: washed with distilled water and dried with spraying + sandblasting with Al₂O₃ + potassium hydroxide (Zirclean); and Group 5: washed with distilled water and dried with spraying + sandblasting with Al₂O₃ + 1% NaClO. All of the groups were contaminated with artificial saliva for 1 minute and then cleaned. Statistical analyses were performed using ANOVA and Tukey's tests. RESULTS. There were statistically significant differences among all groups for µSBS (P < .05). The group treated with zirconium oxide (Group 3) showed the highest µSBS (18.75 ± 0.23 MPa). CONCLUSION. When applied to zirconia, the cleaning methods affected the bonding with resin cement differently.

• 대한치과기공학회지
• /
• 제43권1호
• /
• pp.6-12
• /
• 2021

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the shear bond strength between zirconia cores and veneer ceramics as per the sand blasting and liner treatments. Methods: The following 4 groups of zirconia-veneering ceramic specimens were prepared: (1) Group I, untreated; (2) Group II, with 110 ㎛ aluminium oxide (Al2O3) sandblasting; (3) Group III, with liner (IPS e.max ZirLiner; Ivoclar Vivadent); and (4) Group IV, with 110 ㎛ Al2O3 sand blasting and liner. Surface roughness was measured for all the prepared specimens, and the surface morphology was observed using a scanning electron microscope. All the samples (n=40) were fixed with measuring jigs, and shear bond strengths were obtained using a universal testing machine with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The shear bond strength data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and t-test. The post hoc comparison was performed using the Tukey's test (α=0.05). Results: A significant difference in the surface roughness was observed between the specimens of groups I and II (p<0.05). Surface treatment with liner and sandblasting showed higher shear bond strength between zirconia core and veneering ceramic (p<0.05). Conclusion: The sand blasting and liner treatment increased the shear bond strength between zirconia core and veneering ceramic.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제5권4호
• /
• pp.485-493
• /
• 2013

PURPOSE. To evaluate the effects of surface treatments on shear bond strength (SBS) between microwave and conventionally sintered zirconia core/veneers. MATERIALS AND METHODS. 96 disc shaped Noritake Alliance zirconia specimens were fabricated using YenaDent CAM unit and were divided in 2 groups with respect to microwave or conventional methods (n=48/group). Surface roughness (Ra) evaluation was made with a profilometer on randomly selected microwave (n=10) and conventionally sintered (n=10) cores. Specimens were then assessed into 4 subgroups according to surface treatments applied (n=12/group). Groups for microwave (M) and conventionally (C) sintered core specimens were as follows; $M_C$,$C_C$: untreated (control group), $M_1,C_1:Al_2O_3$ sandblasting, $M_2,C_2$:liner, $M_3,C_3:Al_2O_3$ sandblasting followed by liner. Veneer ceramic was fired on zirconia cores and specimens were thermocycled (6000 cycles between $5^{\circ}-55^{\circ}C$). All specimens were subjected to SBS test using a universal testing machine at 0.5 mm/min, failure were evaluated under an optical microscope. Data were statistically analyzed using Shapiro Wilk, Levene, Post-hoc Tukey HSD and Student's t tests, Two-Way-Variance- Analysis and One-Way-Variance-Analysis (${\alpha}$=.05). RESULTS. Conventionally sintered specimens ($1.06{\pm}0.32{\mu}m$) showed rougher surfaces compared to microwave sintered ones ($0.76{\pm}0.32{\mu}m$)(P=.046), however, no correlation was found between SBS and surface roughness (r=-0.109, P=.658). The statistical comparison of the shear bond strengths of $C_3$ and $C_1$ group (P=.015); $C_C$ and $M_C$ group (P=.004) and $C_3$ and $M_3$ group presented statistically higher (P=.005) values. While adhesive failure was not seen in any of the groups, cohesive and combined patterns were seen in all groups. CONCLUSION. Based on the results of this in-vitro study, $Al_2O_{3-}$ sandblasting followed by liner application on conventionally sintered zirconia cores may be preferred to enhance bond strength.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제45권5호
• /
• pp.601-610
• /
• 2007

Statement of problem: The adhesion between titanium and ceramic is less optimal than conventional metal-ceramic bonding, due to reaction layer form on cast titanium surface during porcelain firing. Purpose: This study characterized the effect of titanium-ceramic adhesion after gold and TiN coating on cast and wrought titanium substrates. Material and method: Six groups of ASTM grade II commercially pure titanium and cast titanium specimens$(13mm{\times}13mm{\times}1mm)$ were prepared(n=8). The conventional Au-Pd-In alloy served as the control. All specimens were sandblasted with $110{\mu}m\;Al_2O_3$ particles and ultrasonically cleaned for 5min in deionized water and dried in air before porcelain firing. An ultra-low-fusing dental porcelain (Vita Titankeramik) was fused on titanium surfaces. Porcelain was debonded by a biaxial flexure test at a cross head speed of 0.25mm/min. The excellent titanium-ceramic adherence was exhibited by the presence of a dentin porcelain layer on the specimen surface after the biaxial flexure test. Area fraction of adherent porcelain (AFAP) was determined by SEM/EDS. Numerical results were statistically analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls test at ${\alpha}=0.05$. Results: The AFAP value of cast titanium was greatest in the group 2 with TiN coating, followed by group 1 with Au coating and the group 3 with $Al_2O_3$ sandblasting. Significant statistical difference was found between the group 1, 2 and the group 3 (p<.05). The AFAP value of wrought titanium was greatest in the group 5 with TiN coating, followed by the group 4 with Au coating and the group 6 with $Al_2O_3$ sandblasting. Conclusion: No significant difference was observed among the three groups (p>.05). The AFAP values of the cast titanium and the wrought titanium were similar. However the group treated with $Al_2O_3$ sandblasting showed significantly lower value (p<.05).

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제39권2호
• /
• pp.157-170
• /
• 2001

The bond strength is the most important factor in establishing long-term success of resin-retained fixed prostheses. So, various surface treatment methods have been introduced to improve the bond strength of metal surface and bonding resin till now This study was performed to compare the effect of silicoating with that of metal primer and analyze the correlation between treatment time of sandblasting and the bond strength, so that meant to find more effective surface treatment method that could enhance the bond strength of resin-retained fixed prostheses. The surfaces of all specimens made of $Verabond^{(R)}$ alloys were air abraded with $250{\mu}m\;Al_2O_3$ according to treatment time of sandblasting and they were subdivided to be treated with only sandblasting(S group), silicoating following sandblasting(SS group) and metal primer application after sandblasting(SM group). Then pairs of metal specimens (${\phi}10mm{\times}h\;2mm,\;{\phi}6{\times}h\;2mm$) were bonded with Super bond $C&B^{(R)}$. The specimens were stored in $38^{\circ}C$ water for 48 hours and shear bond strength was measured using the universal testing machine. The results were as follows, 1. In the comparison of shear bond strength according to treatment time of sandblasting, bond strength was increased in the order of 0', 15', 30', 45', 60' group. 0' group had significantly lower value than any other, while 0', 15' group were significantly different with 30', 45', 60' group(p<0.05). 2. In the comparison of shear bond strength according surface treatment methods, bond strength was increased in the order of S group. SS group and SM group. S group was significantly different with SS group and SM group(p<0.05). 3. Observing the mode of bond failure. 0', 15' group showed only adhesive failure, and 30', 45', 60' group did mostly adhesive & cohesive failure in S group. In SS group and SM group, all other groups except 0', 15' group showed mostly cohesive failure. From the above results, it is considered that sandblasting should be treated for more than 30 seconds, and metal primer be more effective and available clinically than silicoater system which is complicate, technique-sensitive and time-consuming method, when nonprecious metal surface is planning be treated with in order enhance the bond strength of resin-retained fixed prostheses.

• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.69-79
• /
• 2013

본 연구의 목적은 각각 다른 표면처리를 한 지르코니아를 레진시멘트로 접착한 후 전단결합강도를 평가, 비교하는 것이다. 디스크 모양의 산화 지르코늄(3-TZP, Kyoritsu, Tokyo, Japan) 시편 120 개를 다음과 같이 표면처리 하였다. (1)110 ${\mu}m$ 산화 알루미나 분사 처리 (2)Silica coating(RocatecTM, 3M ESPE) (3)처리하지 않음 시편을 한 군당 10 개씩 총 6 개군으로 나누어 두 개의 지르코니아 시편을 자가 접착형 레진 시멘트(RelyX U-200, 3M ESPE)로 합착하였다. (1)처리하지 않음/처리하지 않음 (2)처리하지 않음/110 ${\mu}m$ 산화 알루미나 분사처리 (3)처리하지 않음/Silica coating (4)110 ${\mu}m$ 산화 알루미나 분사 처리/110 ${\mu}m$ 산화 알루미나 분사 처리 (5)110 ${\mu}m$ 산화 알루미나 분사 처리/Silica coating (6)Silica coating/Silica coating. 각 군의 전단결합강도를 만능시험기로 측정하였다. 표면처리에 따른 결합강도의 차이를 살펴보기 위해 일원변량분석(One-way ANOVA)을 이용하고 사후 분석으로 Tukey HSD test를 실시하였다. Silica coating을 한 두 개의 시편을 접착한 군이 가장 높은 결합 강도를 보였다(P<0.05). 표면 처리하지 않은 시편을 접착한 군과 두 개의 시편 모두 알루미나 분사 처리한 시편을 접착한 군은 서로 간에 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았으며, 그 외의 군에 비해서는 유의하게 낮았다(P<0.05). 본 연구의 결과에 따르면 Silica coating은 자가중합형 레진시멘트를 이용하여 접착한 두 지르코니아 간의 결합을 증진시키는데 효과적이었다.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제43권4호
• /
• pp.426-437
• /
• 2005

Statement of problem : Although zirconium oxide ceramics are more and more commonly used in restorative dentistry, for many clinical applications only limited data can be found in the literature. However it is quite clear that hydrofluoric acid etching is impossible with zirconia ceramics. Therefore, other bonding techniques are required in order to lute these materials adhesively. Purpose : The purpose or this study was to evaluate the effects of surface treatments on shear bond strengths between two resin cements and a zirconia ceramic. Materials and methods : Experimental industrially manufactured yttrium-oxide-partially-stabilized zirconia ceramic discs (Adens, Korea) were used for this study. The ceramic specimens divided into five experimental groups and a control group (as received). Five surface treatments were studied 1) sandblasting with 110$\mu$m $Al_2O_3$ at 3 bars pressure 13 seconds at a distance of 10 mm, 2) flame-treated with the Silano-Pen for 5 $s/cm^3$, 3) grinding with a diamond bur. 4) sandblasting + Silano-Pen treatment, 5) diamond bur preparation + Silano-Pen treatment. Acrylic plastic tube (5 mm in height and 3 mm in diameter) were filled with composite to fabricate composite cylinders The composite cylinders were bonded to the ceramic specimens with either Superbond C&B or Panavia F resin luting agents. All cemented specimens were tested under shear loading until fracture on universal testing machine at a crosshead speed 1mm/min; the maximum load at fracture was recorded. Sheat bond strength data were analyzed with oneway analysis of variance and Tukey HSD tests (P<.05). Treated ceramic surfaces and fracture surfaces after shear testing were examined morphologically using scanning electron microscope. Results: Ceramic surface treatment with Silano-Pen after sandblasting improved the bond strength of Superbond C&B resin cement. Supevbond C& B resin cement at Silano-Pen aiker sandblasting($27.4{\pm}3.8MPa$) showed statistically higher shear bond strength than the others. Conclusion: Within the limitation of this study, Superbond C& &B resin cement are suitable for cementation of zirconia ceramics and flame-treated with the Silano-Pen after sandblasting is required to enhance the bond strength.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제45권2호
• /
• pp.169-181
• /
• 2007

Statement of problem: Titanium is well known as a proper metal for the dental restorations, because it has an excellent biocompatibility, resistance to corrosion, and mechanical property. However, adhesion between titanium and dental porcelains is related to the diffusion of oxygen to the reaction layers formed on cast-titanium surfaces during porcelain firing and those oxidized layers make the adhesion difficult to be formed. Many studies using mechanical, chemical and physical methods to enhance the titanium-ceramic adhesion have been actively performed. Purpose: This study meant to comparatively analyse the adhesion characteristics depending on different titanium surface coatings after coating the casts and wrought titanium surfaces with Au and TiN. Material and method: In this study, the titanium specimens (CP-Ti, Grade 2, Kobe still Co. Japan) were categorized into cast and wrought titanium. The wrought titanium was cast by using the MgO-based investment(Selevest CB, Selec). The cast and wrought titanium were treated with Au coating($ParaOne^{(R)}$., Gold Ion Sputter, Model PS-1200) and TiN coating(ATEC system, Korea) and the ultra low fusing dental porcelain was fused and fired onto the samples. Biaxial flection test was done on the fired samples and the porcelain was separated. The adhesion characteristics of porcelain and titanium after firing and the specimen surfaces before and after the porcelain fracture test were observed with SEM. The atomic percent of Si on all sample surfaces was comparatively analysed by EDS. In addition, the constituents of specimen surface layers after the porcelain fracture and the formed compound were evaluated by X-ray diffraction diagnosis. Result: The results of this study were obtained as follows : 1. The surface characteristics of cast and wrought titanium after surface treatment(Au, TiN, $Al_2O_3$ sandblasting) were similar and each cast and wrought titanium showed similar bonding characteristics. 2. Before and after the biaxial flection test, the highest atomic weight change of Si component was found in $Al_2O_3$ sandblasted wrought titanium(28.6at.% $\rightarrow$ 8.3at.%). On the other hand, the least change was seen in Au-Pd-In alloy(24.5at.% $\rightarrow$ 9.1at.%). 3. Much amount of Si components was uniformly distributed in Au and TiN coated titanium, but less amount of Si's was unevenly dispersed on Al2O3 sandblasting surfaces. 4. In X-ray diffraction diagnosis after porcelain debonding, we could see $Au_2Ti$ compound and TiN coating layers on Au and TiN coated surfaces and $TiO_2$, typical oxide of titanium, on all titanium surfaces. 5. Debonding of porcelain on cast and wrought titanium surface after the biaxial flection is considered as a result of adhesion deterioration between coating layers and titanium surfaces. We found that there are both adhesive failure and cohesive failure at the same time. Conclusion: These results showed that the titanium-ceramic adhesion could be improved by coating cast and wrought titanium surfaces with Au and TiN when making porcelain fused to metal crowns. In order to use porcelain fused to titanium clinically, it is considered that coating technique to enhance the bonding strength between coating kKlayers and titanium surfaces should be developed first.