산업진흥연구 (Industry Promotion Research)

  • 제9권4호
  • /
  • Pages.297-309
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 2466-1139(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2714-013X(eISSN)
산업진흥원 (Industrial Promotion Institute)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

불안형 애착과 투사적 동일시가 외도에 미치는 영향에 대한 심리치료적 접근

Psychotherapeutic Approach to the Effects of Insecure Attachment and Projective Identification on Infidelity

  • 윤석주 (한국열린사이버대학교 상담심리학과)
  • Suk-Ju Yun (Dept. of Counseling Psychology, Open Cyber University of Korea)
  • 투고 : 2024.09.30
  • 심사 : 2024.10.25
  • 발행 : 2024.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 불안형 애착과 투사적 동일시가 외도 행위에 미치는 심리적 영향을 깊이 분석이다. 문헌고찰을 체계적으로 수집, 분석하여 불안형 애착과 투사적 동일시가 외도 행동과 어떻게 연결되는지를 탐색하였으며, 이론적 배경을 강화하고, 상담 및 치료 과정에서의 응용 가능성을 제시하고자 하였다. 불안형 애착 유형(불안형, 회피형, 혼재형)에 따른 외도의 발생 가능성과 양상을 분석하였으며, 투사적 동일시가 외도 행위를 정당화하고 관계를 악화시키는 데 중요한 역할을 하는지 조사하였으며, 불안형 애착 유형은 파트너로부터 버림받을 것이라는 두려움으로 외도를 통해 자신에게 안정감을 찾으려는 경향과, 회피형 애착 유형은 정서적 친밀감을 회피하고 독립성을 유지하려는 성향으로, 외도를 통해 관계에서 거리를 두려는 경향이 두드러졌다. 혼재형 애착은 불안과 회피가 혼재된 상태로, 외도를 통해 극단적인 감정 변화를 해소하려는 경향을 보였다. 또한, 투사적 동일시는 자신의 부정적인 감정과 불안을 상대방에게 투사하여, 외도의 책임을 상대방에게 전가하는 심리적 메커니즘으로 작용했다. 이를 통해 외도는 자신을 보호하거나 정당화하려는 수단이 되어 관계를 더욱 악화시키는 결과를 초래했다. 본 연구는 불안형 애착과 투사적 동일시가 외도 행위의 중요한 심리적 배경이며, 상담 및 치료 프로그램 개발에 중요한 시사점을 제공하며, 개인의 심리적 건강 증진과 더불어 건강한 관계 형성을 위한 기초 자료로 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

The purpose of this study is to deeply analyze the psychological influence of anxious attachment and projective identification on extramarital behavior. By systematically collecting and analyzing literature reviews, we explored how anxious attachment and projective identification are connected to extramarital behavior, strengthened the theoretical background, and suggested the possibility of application in counseling and treatment processes. We analyzed the possibility and pattern of extramarital behavior according to anxious attachment types (anxious, avoidant, and mixed types), and investigated whether projective identification plays an important role in justifying extramarital behavior and worsening relationships. The anxious attachment type tends to find stability in oneself through extramarital behavior due to the fear of being abandoned by the partner, while the avoidant attachment type tends to avoid emotional intimacy and maintain independence, and tends to distance oneself from the relationship through extramarital behavior. Mixed attachment is a state of mixed anxiety and avoidance, and tends to relieve extreme emotional changes through extramarital behavior. In addition, projective identification functions as a psychological mechanism that projects one's negative emotions and anxiety onto the other person and shifts responsibility for extramarital behavior to the other person. Through this, infidelity became a means to protect or justify oneself, which resulted in worsening the relationship. This study shows that anxious attachment and projective identification are important psychological backgrounds of infidelity, and it provides important implications for the development of counseling and treatment programs. It can be used as basic data for promoting individual psychological health and forming healthy relationships.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. McCarthy, G., & Maughan, B. (2010). Negative Childhood Experiences and Adult Love Relationships: The Role of Internal Working Models of Attachment. Attachment & Human Development, 12, 445-461.
  2. Crowell, J., &Waters, E. (1994). Bowlby's Theory Grown Up: The Role of Attachment in Adult Love Relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 31-34.
  3. Cassidy, J., & Berlin, L. (1994). The Insecure/Ambivalent Pattern of Attachment: Theory and Research. Child Development, 65, 971-991.
  4. West, M., & George, C. (1999). Abuse and Violence in Intimate Adult Relationships: New Perspectives from Attachment Theory. Attachment & Human Development, 1, 137-156.
  5. Lo, C., Chan, K., & Ip, P. (2019). Insecure Adult Attachment and Child Maltreatment: A Meta-Analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 20, 706-719.
  6. Mayseless, O. (1991). Adult Attachment Patterns and Courtship Violence. Family Relations, 40, 21-28.
  7. Macdonald, G., Locke, K., Spielmann, S. S., & Joel, S. (2013). Insecure Attachment Predicts Ambivalent Social Threat and Reward Perceptions in Romantic Relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 647-661.
  8. Feeney, J. A., & Noller, P. (1990). Attachment Style as a Predictor of Adult Romantic Relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 281-291.
  9. Yi, J., Zhu, X., Auerbach, R., Gardiner, C. K., Lin, C., Wang, Y., & Yao, S. (2012). Insecure Attachment as a Predictor of Depressive and Anxious Symptomology. Depression and Anxiety, 29, 1-8.
  10. Miga, E. M., Hare, A. L., Allen, J., &Manning, N. (2010). The Relation of Insecure Attachment States of Mind and Romantic Attachment Styles to Adolescent Aggression in Romantic Relationships. Attachment & Human Development, 12, 463-481.
  11. Paoli, T. D., Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M., &Krug, I. (2017). Insecure Attachment and Maladaptive Schema in Disordered Eating: The Mediating Role of Rejection Sensitivity. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 24, 1273-1284.
  12. Brown, G. W., Harris, T., & Craig, T. (2018). Exploration of the Influence of Insecure Attachment and Parental Maltreatment on the Incidence and Course of Adult Clinical Depression. Psychological Medicine, 49, 1025-1032.
  13. Baer, J., & Martinez, C. D. (2006). Child maltreatment and insecure attachment: a meta analysis. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 24, 187-197.
  14. Abela, J., Hankin, B., Haigh, E. A. P., Adams, P., Vinokuroff, T., & Trayhern, L. (2005). Interpersonal Vulnerability to Depression in High-Risk Children: The Role of Insecure Attachment and Reassurance Seeking. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 34, 182-192.
  15. Bachmann, C., Beecham, J., O'Connor, T., Scott, A., Briskman, J., & Scott, S. (2019). The Cost of Love: Financial Consequences of Insecure Attachment in Antisocial Youth. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines. 12/2019, Volume 60, Issue 12.
  16. Forrester, M. (2006). Projective Identification and Intersubjectivity. Theory & Psychology, 16, 783-802.
  17. Olds, D. (2006). Identification: Psychoanalytic and Biological Perspectives. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 54, 17-46.
  18. Rh, E. (1985). Identification and Its Vicissitudes. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 66, 3-18.
  19. Steffens, N. K., Greenaway, K. H., Moore, S., Munt, K., Grundmann, F., Haslam, S., Jetten, J., Postmes, T., Skorich, D., & Tatachari, S. (2023). Meta-Identification: Perceptions of Others' Group Identification Shape Group Life. European Journal of Social Psychology.
  20. Braddock, L. (2018). Understanding Projective Identification. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 25, 65-79.
  21. Ogden, T. (1979). On Projective Identification. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 60, 357-373.
  22. Ng, H. (1986). Positive Projective Identification. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 67, 489-496.
  23. Forrester, M. (2006). Projective Identification and Intersubjectivity. Theory &Psychology, 16, 783-802.
  24. Sands, S. H. (1997). Self Psychology and Projective Identification-Whither Shall They Meet? A Reply to the Editors (1995). Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 7, 651-668.
  25. Blow, A., & Hartnett, K. (2005). Infidelity in Committed Relationships II: A Substantive Review. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31, 217-233.
  26. Isanejad, O., & Bagheri, A. (2018). Marital Quality, Loneliness, and Internet Infidelity. CyberPsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21, 542-548.
  27. Munsch, C. L. (2015). Her Support, His Support: Money, Masculinity, and Marital Infidelity. American Sociological Review, 80, 469-495.
  28. Buss, D., & Shackelford, T. (1997). Susceptibility to Infidelity in the First Year of Marriage. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 193-221.
  29. Weiser, D. A., Lalasz, C. B., Weigel, D. J., & Evans, W. (2014). A Prototype Analysis of Infidelity. Personal Relationships, 21, 655-675.
  30. Barbaro, N., Sela, Y., Atari, M., Shackelford, T., & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2019). Romantic Attachment and Mate Retention Behavior: The Mediating Role of Perceived Risk of Partner Infidelity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36, 940-956.
  31. Altinok, A., & Kilic, N. (2020). Exploring the Associations Between Narcissism, Intentions Towards Infidelity, and Relationship Satisfaction: Attachment Styles as a Moderator. PLoS ONE, 15, e0237265.
  32. Duba, J., Kindsvatter, A., &Lara, T. (2008). Treating Infidelity: Considering Narratives of Attachment. The Family Journal, 16, 293-299.
  33. Russell, V., Baker, L. R., & McNulty, J. K. (2013). Attachment Insecurity and Infidelity in Marriage: Do Studies of Dating Relationships Really Inform Us About Marriage? Journal of Family Psychology, 27, 242-251.
  34. Wang, C. D. C., King, M., & Debernardi, N. R. (2012). Adult Attachment, Cognitive Appraisal, and University Students' Reactions to Romantic Infidelity. Journal of College Counseling, 15, 101-116.
  35. Warach, B., & Josephs, L. (2019). The Aftershocks of Infidelity: A Review of Infidelity-Based Attachment Trauma. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 36, 68-90.
  36. Buck, N., Leenaars, E. P. E. M., Emmelkamp, P., & Marle, H. V. v. (2012). Explaining the Relationship Between Insecure Attachment and Partner Abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 3149-3170.
  37. Petriglieri, G., & Stein, M. J. (2012). The Unwanted Self: Projective Identification in Leaders' Identity Work. Organization Studies, 33, 1217-1235.
  38. Jureidini, J. (1990). Projective Identification in General Psychiatry. British Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 656-660.
  39. Kernberg, O. (1987). Projection and Projective Identification: Developmental and Clinical Aspects. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 35, 795-819.
  40. Nathans, S. (2016). Whose Disgust Is It Anyway?: Projection and Projective Identification in the Couple Relationship. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 26, 437-443.
  41. Weiss, H. (2014). Projective Identification and Working Through of the Countertransference: A Multiphase Model. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 95, 739-756.
  42. Catherall, D. (1992). Working With Projective Identification in Couples. Family Process, 31(4), 355-367.
  43. Oka, M., Sandberg, J., Bradford, A. B., & Brown, A. P. (2014). Insecure Attachment Behavior and Partner Violence: Incorporating Couple Perceptions of Insecure Attachment and Relational Aggression. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 40, 412-429.
  44. Miga, E. M., Hare, A. L., Allen, J., &Manning, N. (2010). The Relation of Insecure Attachment States of Mind and Romantic Attachment Styles to Adolescent Aggression in Romantic Relationships. Attachment & Human Development, 12, 463-481.
  45. Shephard, E., Batistuzzo, M., Hoexter, M., Stern, E., Zuccolo, P., Ogawa, C. Y., Silva, R., Brunoni, A., Costa, D. L. C., Doretto, V., Saraiva, L., Cappi, C., Shavitt, R., Simpson, H., Heuvel, O. A. v. d., &Miguel, E. (2021). Neurocircuit Models of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Limitations and Future Directions for Research. Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry, 44, 187-200.
  46. Marsh, H., Reeve, J., Guo, J., Pekrun, R., Parada, R. H., Parker, P., Basarkod, G., Craven, R., Jang, H., Dicke, T., Ciarrochi, J., Sahdra, B. K., Devine, E., & Cheon, S. (2022). Overcoming Limitations in Peer-Victimization Research That Impede Successful Intervention: Challenges and New Directions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18, 812-828.
  47. Tyldum, G. (2010). Limitations in Research on Human Trafficking. International Migration, 48, 1-13.
  48. Powell, G. (2020). Work-Family Lockdown: Implications for a Post-Pandemic Research Agenda. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 35, 639-646.
  49. Lee, S. (2020). Corporate Social Responsibility and COVID-19: Research Implications. Tourism Economics, 28, 863-869.
  50. Aguinis, H., Jensen, S., & Kraus, S. (2021). Policy Implications of Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management Research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 35, 367-381.
  51. Palacios, J., Rolock, N., Selwyn, J., & Barbosa-Ducharne, M. (2018). Breakdown: Concept, Research, and Implications. Research on Social Work Practice, 29, 130-142.
  52. Petriglieri, G., & Stein, M. J. (2012). The Unwanted Self: Projective Identification in Leaders' Identity Work. Organization Studies, 33, 1217-1235.
  53. Zheng, L., Luo, Y., & Chen, X. (2020). Different Effects of Attachment Anxiety and Attachment Avoidance on Depressive Symptoms: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(11), 3028-3050.
  54. Peng, W., Liu, Z., Liu, Q., Chu, J., Zheng, K., Wang, J., Wei, H., Zhong, M., Ling, Y., & Yi, J. (2020). Insecure Attachment and Maladaptive Emotion Regulation Mediating the Relationship Between Childhood Trauma and Borderline Personality Features. Depression and Anxiety, 38(1), 28-39
  55. Toplu-Demirtas, E., Akcabozan-Kayabol, N. B., Araci-Iyiaydin, A., & Fincham, F. (2020). Unraveling the Roles of Distrust, Suspicion of Infidelity, and Jealousy in Cyber Dating Abuse Perpetration: An Attachment Theory Perspective. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(1-2), NP1432-NP1462.
  56. Romeo, A., Tella, M. D., Ghiggia, A., Tesio, V., Fusaro, E., Geminiani, G., & Castelli, L. (2020). Attachment Style and Parental Bonding: Relationships with Fibromyalgia and Alexithymia. PLOS ONE, 15.
  57. Richter, M., Schlegel, K., Thomas, P., & Troche, S. (2022). Adult Attachment and Personality as Predictors of Jealousy in Romantic Relationships. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.
  58. Gordon, K. C., & Mitchell, E. A. (2020). Infidelity in the Time of COVID 19. Family Process, 59, 956-966.
  59. Fife, S. T., Gossner, J. D., Theobald, A. C., Allen, E., Rivero, A., & Koehl, H. (2023). Couple Healing from Infidelity: A Grounded Theory Study. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 40, 3882-3905.
  60. Richter, M., Schlegel, K., Thomas, P., & Troche, S. (2022). Adult Attachment and Personality as Predictors of Jealousy in Romantic Relationships. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.
  61. Selterman, D., Garcia, J. R., & Tsapelas, I. (2020). What Do People Do, Say, and Feel When They Have Affairs? Associations Between Extradyadic Infidelity Motives with Behavioral, Emotional, and Sexual Outcomes. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 47, 238-252.
  62. Caldwell, J. M., Meredith, P., Whittingham, K., Ziviani, J., & Wilson, T. (2023). Women Pregnant After Previous Perinatal Loss: Relationships Between Adult Attachment, Shame, and Prenatal Psychological Outcomes. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, None, 1-15.
  63. Cushing, T., Robertson, S., Mannes, J. M. M., Marshall, N., Carey, M., Duschinsky, R., & Meiser-Stedman, R. (2023). The Relationship Between Attachment and Posttraumatic Stress in Children and Adolescents: A Meta-Analytic Review. Development and Psychopathology, None, 1-15.
  64. Kato, T., & Okubo, N. (2023). Relationship Status and Gender-Related Differences in Response to Infidelity. Frontiers in Psychology, 14.
  65. Varma, P., & Maheshwari, S. (2023). How Do People Betray in Relationships? Understanding the Process of Infidelity in Dating Relationships. Deviant Behavior, 45, 126-138.
  66. Spencer, C. M., Keilholtz, B. M., & Stith, S. (2020). The Association Between Attachment Styles and Physical Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration and Victimization: A Meta-Analysis. Family Process, Mar2021, Vol. 60 Issue 1, p270-284. 15p.
  67. Debrot, A., Stellar, J., Macdonald, G., Keltner, D., & Impett, E. (2020). Is Touch in Romantic Relationships Universally Beneficial for Psychological Well-Being? The Role of Attachment Avoidance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47, 1495-1509.
  68. Gordon, K. C., & Mitchell, E. A. (2020). Infidelity in the Time of COVID 19. Family Process, 59, 956-966.