식품보건융합연구 (The Korean Journal of Food & Health Convergence)

한국식품보건융합학회 (Korea Food & Health Convergence Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Beyond the Plate: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis of Psychological Determinants in Out-of-Home Food Choice Behaviors

  • Kyung Tae JANG (Dept. of Food & Cooking Science, Sunchon National University) ;
  • Bo-Kyung SEO (Department of Human Service, Addiction Counseling Major, Eulji University)
  • 투고 : 2024.09.30
  • 심사 : 2024.11.05
  • 발행 : 2024.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study employs a qualitative meta-synthesis approach to investigate the psychological determinants of food choice in out-of-home dining contexts. Drawing from 25 qualitative studies published between 2000 and 2024, we analyze the complex interplay of personal, sociocultural, situational, and sensory factors influencing consumers' food selection behaviors in restaurants. Our findings reveal that while individual preferences play a role, social norms and expectations exert a more significant influence in dining-out scenarios, often overshadowing personal tastes. The physical environment of restaurants, including ambiance and decor, substantially impacts diners' cognitive and emotional responses, subsequently affecting their food choices. Menu design and presentation emerge as powerful tools in guiding consumer decisions, particularly when emphasizing healthier options. Moreover, service quality is found to significantly influence not only satisfaction but also the diversity and adventurousness of food choices. This meta-synthesis extends existing food choice models by incorporating context-specific factors unique to out-of-home dining experiences. It underscores the need for a more nuanced understanding of the psychological processes underlying food selection in restaurant settings. Our results offer valuable insights for both theoretical advancements in consumer behavior and practical applications in the foodservice industry. Future research directions are proposed, including the development of an integrated model specific to out-of-home dining contexts.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bitner, M. J. (1992). Servicescapes: The impact of physical surroundings on customers and employees. Journal of Marketing, 56(2), 57-71. 
  2. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press. 
  3. Cohen, D. A., & Babey, S. H. (2012). Contextual influences on eating behaviours: Heuristic processing and dietary choices. Obesity Reviews, 13(9), 766-779. 
  4. Connors, M., Bisogni, C. A., Sobal, J., & Devine, C. M. (2001). Managing values in personal food systems. Appetite, 36(3), 189-200. 
  5. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. 
  6. Desmet, P. M., & Schifferstein, H. N. (2008). Sources of positive and negative emotions in food experience. Appetite, 50(2-3), 290-301. 
  7. Edwards, J. S. (2013). The foodservice industry: Eating out is more than just a meal. Food Quality and Preference, 27(2), 223-229. 
  8. Fischler, C. (1988). Food, self and identity. Social Science Information, 27(2), 275-292. 
  9. Furst, T., Connors, M., Bisogni, C. A., Sobal, J., & Falk, L. W. (1996). Food choice: A conceptual model of the process. Appetite, 26(3), 247-266. 
  10. Ha, J., & Jang, S. (2010). Effects of service quality and food quality: The moderating role of atmospherics in an ethnic restaurant segment. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(3), 520-529. 
  11. Ha, J., & Jang, S. (2013). Variety seeking in restaurant choice and its drivers. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 32, 155-168. 
  12. Higgs, S., & Thomas, J. (2016). Social influences on eating. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1-6. 
  13. Koster, E. P. (2009). Diversity in the determinants of food choice: A psychological perspective. Food Quality and Preference, 20(2), 70-82. 
  14. Krishna, A. (2012). An integrative review of sensory marketing: Engaging the senses to affect perception, judgment and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 332-351. 
  15. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications. 
  16. Macht, M. (2008). How emotions affect eating: A five-way model. Appetite, 50(1), 1-11. 
  17. Malterud, K. (2001). Qualitative research: Standards, challenges, and guidelines. The Lancet, 358(9280), 483-488. 
  18. Meiselman, H. L. (2006). The role of context in food choice, food acceptance and food consumption. In R. Shepherd & M. Raats (Eds.), The psychology of food choice (pp. 179-199). CABI. 
  19. Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Sage Publications. 
  20. Paddock, J., Warde, A., & Whillans, J. (2017). The changing meaning of eating out in three English cities 1995-2015. Appetite, 119, 5-13. 
  21. Pliner, P., & Bell, R. (2009). A table for one: The pain and pleasure of eating alone. In H. L. Meiselman (Ed.), Meals in science and practice (pp. 169-189). Woodhead Publishing. 
  22. Rozin, P. (2006). The integration of biological, social, cultural and psychological influences on food choice. In R. Shepherd & M. Raats (Eds.), The psychology of food choice (pp. 19-39). CABI. 
  23. Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. Springer Publishing Company. 
  24. Sobal, J., & Bisogni, C. A. (2009). Constructing food choice decisions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 38(suppl_1), s37-s46. 
  25. Spence, C. (2017). Gastrophysics: The new science of eating. Viking. 
  26. Steptoe, A., Pollard, T. M., & Wardle, J. (1995). Development of a measure of the motives underlying the selection of food: The food choice questionnaire. Appetite, 25(3), 267-284. 
  27. Stroebele, N., & De Castro, J. M. (2004). Effect of ambience on food intake and food choice. Nutrition, 20(9), 821-838. 
  28. Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 45. 
  29. Timulak, L. (2009). Meta-analysis of qualitative studies: A tool for reviewing qualitative research findings in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 19(4-5), 591-600. 
  30. Toye, F., Seers, K., Allcock, N., Briggs, M., Carr, E., & Barker, K. (2014). Meta-ethnography 25 years on: Challenges and insights for synthesising a large number of qualitative studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14(1), 80. 
  31. Walsh, D., & Downe, S. (2005). Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: A literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50(2), 204-211. 
  32. Wansink, B., & Love, K. (2014). Slim by design: Menu strategies for promoting high-margin, healthy foods. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 42, 137-143.