환경생물 (Korean Journal of Environmental Biology)

  • 제42권3호
  • /
  • Pages.219-231
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 1226-9999(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-7851(eISSN)
한국환경생물학회 (Korean Society of Environmental Biology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

카메라 트래핑을 활용한 진관동습지의 조류 및 포유류 종다양성 모니터링

Monitoring bird and mammal diversity using camera trapping in Jingwan-dong wetland

  • 박지윤 (서울대학교 협동과정 조경학) ;
  • 강유진 (서울대학교 협동과정 조경학) ;
  • 송영근 (서울대학교 환경대학원 환경설계학과)
  • Jiyoon Park (Interdisciplinary Program in Landscape Architecture, Seoul National University) ;
  • Yujin Kang (Interdisciplinary Program in Landscape Architecture, Seoul National University) ;
  • Youngkeun Song (Department of Environmental Design, Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2023.07.27
  • 심사 : 2024.09.02
  • 발행 : 2024.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 서울시 은평구 북한산국립공원 내에 위치한 진관동습지 내 관찰된 조류 및 포유류 조사 결과에 대해 카메라 트래핑 방법의 효율성을 확인하고, 생물다양성의 변화를 파악하는 효과적인 모니터링 방법으로 제안하기 위하여 수행되었다. 2022년 2월부터 6월까지 121일 동안 3가지의 수환경을 대상으로 총 6대의 카메라를 설치하여 카메라 트래핑을 진행하였다. 그 결과, 총 14,742개의 영상을 취득하였으며 데이터 취득률은 59.2%로 나타났다. 이를 분석하여 총 20과 47종의 조류와 7과 8종의 포유류의 서식을 확인하였다. 과거 생물조사 결과 비교를 위하여 2011년부터 지난 10년간의 현장관찰조사 결과를 취합한 결과, 총 33과 90종의 조류와 5과 6종의 포유류가 서식하는 것으로 확인되었다. 생물다양성이 감소하는 경향을 보이는 진관동습지에서 카메라 트래핑을 통하여 확장된 생물종목록을 도출하였으며, 이는 지난 10년간 관찰되지 않았던 3과 3종의 조류와 2과 2종의 포유류를 포함한 결과이다. 현장관찰조사가 지닌 시간적인 한계를 보완하는 카메라 트래핑은 적절한 카메라 설치 전략과 데이터 정제를 통하여 공간적인 한계를 극복한다면 효과적인 모니터링 방법이 될 수 있다. 다양한 분류군에 대한 카메라 트래핑을 통하여 도출된 생물종목록은 향후 복원 및 관리계획의 근거로 활용될 수 있다.

This study applied a camera trapping method to investigate species diversity of birds and mammals in Jingwan-dong Wetland located in Bukhansan National Park, Seoul, Korea. The objectives of this study were to (1) verify the efficiency of the camera trapping method through a combination of literature and observation surveys, and to (2) propose it as an effective monitoring method to assessing changes in biodiversity. From February 2022 to June 2022, a total of six cameras were installed for 121 days to conduct camera trapping in three aquatic environments. As a result, a total of 14,742 videos were obtained with a data acquisition rate of 59.2%. Analysis of the data identified a total of 20 families and 47 species of birds with 7 families and 8 species of mammals. When previous field observation data compiled from the past 10 years starting from 2011 were analyzed, a total of 33 families and 90 species of birds with 5 families and 6 species of mammals were identified. Camera trapping in Jingwan-dong Wetland recorded species list, including 3 families and 3 species of bird and 2 families and 2 species of mammal not observed in the past decade. Thus, camera trapping, which complements temporal limitations of field survey, can be an effective monitoring method for rapidly changing biodiversity if spatial limitations are improved. Resulting species lists can serve as a basis for future restoration and management plans.

키워드

과제정보

본 결과물은 환경부 한국환경산업기술원의 생태계 기반 탄소흡수원 조성·관리 기술개발사업(RS-2023-00218245)의 지원을 받아 작성되었습니다.

참고문헌

  1. Alikhani S, P Nummi and A Ojala. 2021. Urban wetlands: A review on ecological and cultural values. Water 13:3301. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13223301
  2. Aslan C, N Holmes, B Tershy, D Spatz and DA Croll. 2015. Benefits to poorly studied taxa of conservation of bird and mammal diversity on islands. Conserv. Biol. 29:133-142. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12354
  3. Barbier EB. 2011. Wetlands as natural assets. Hydrol. Sci. J. 56: 1360-1373. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2011.629787
  4. Beng KC and RT Corlett. 2020. Applications of environmental DNA (eDNA) in ecology and conservation: opportunities, challenges and prospects. Biodivers. Conserv. 29:2089-2121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-020-01980-0
  5. Caravaggi A, PB Banks, AC Burton, CM Finlay, PM Haswell, MW Hayward, MJ Rowcliffe and MD Wood. 2017. A review of camera trapping for conservation behaviour research. Remote Sens. Ecol. Conserv. 3:109-122. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.48
  6. Choi HK, YR Kim, SY Hwang, Y Chu, P Kim and HJ Lee. 2023. Investigation of fish community structure and species diversity in two river estuary ecosystems, the Taehwa River and Changwon Stream, based on conventional survey and eDNA metabarcoding. Korean J. Environ. Biol. 41:637-656. https://doi.org/10.11626/KJEB.2023.41.4.637
  7. Choi TY, SK Lee and DG Woo. 2019. Study on spatial ecology of Asian Badger(Meles leucurus) by radio telemetry and camera trapping: Focusing on home-range and hibernation sett use pattern. J. Korean Cadastre Inf. Assoc. 21:151-163. https://doi.org/10.46416/JKCIA.2019.12.21.3.151
  8. Chung CU, JY Cha, YC Kim, SC Kim, GH Kwon and HJ Lee. 2014. Monitoring efficiency evaluation of camera trapping in terrestrial mammals. J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 17:65-74. https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2014.17.3.65
  9. Erwin KL. 2009. Wetlands and global climate change: The role of wetland restoration in a changing world. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 17:71-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-008-9119-1
  10. Espartosa KD, BT Pinotti and R Pardini. 2011. Performance of camera trapping and track counts for surveying large mammals in rainforest remnants. Biodivers. Conserv. 20:2815-2829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0110-4
  11. Fraser LH and PA Keddy. 2005. The World's Largest Wetlands: Ecology and Conservation. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  12. Hobbs MT and CS Brehme. 2017. An improved camera trap for amphibians, reptiles, small mammals, and large invertebrates. PLoS One 12:e0185026. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185026
  13. Hwang BY, SG Son, KT Rhie, HW Ji and SW Jung. 2014. Management plans for the avifauna conservation of Jingwan-dong Wetland in Bukhansan National Park. J. Nat. Park Res. 5:1-10.
  14. Jarvinen O and RA Vaisanen. 1979. Changes in bird populations as criteria of environmental changes. Ecography 2:75-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1979.tb00684.x
  15. Jo YS, JT Baccus and JL Koprowski. 2018. Mammals of Korea. National Institute of Biological Resources. Incheon, Korea.
  16. Kim HM, SY Kim, IS Park, HJ Lee, KT Kim, Y Kim, HJ Kim, HJ Kwak, TY Lim and WK Song. 2020. Review and application of environmental DNA(eDNA) investigation of terrestrial species in urban ecosystem. J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 23:69-89. https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2020.23.2.69
  17. Kim JS, DW Cha and Muljari. 2016. Meeting to prepare management plan for Jingwan-dong Wetland in Bukhansan National Park. National Park Conservation Network. Seoul, Korea.
  18. Kim WY, HJ Lee, JW Ha, SJ Park, JC Park, SS Choi, JY Park, JH Lee and JY Cha. 2018. Is camera trapping applicable to bird monitoring? Korean J. Ornithol. 25:23-32. https://doi.org/10.30980/kjo.2018.06.25.1.23
  19. Larson ER, BM Graham, R Achury, JJ Coon, MK Daniels, DK Gambrell, KL Jonasen, GD King, N LaRacuente, TI PerrinStowe, EM Reed, CJ Rice, SA Ruzi, MW Thairu, JC Wilson and AV Suarez. 2020. From eDNA to citizen science: Emerging tools for the early detection of invasive species. Front. Ecol. Environ. 18:194-202. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2162
  20. Laurila-Pant M, A Lehikoinen, L Uusitalo and R Venesjarvi. 2015. How to value biodiversity in environmental management? Ecol. Indic. 55:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.02.034
  21. Lee WS, TH Koo and JY Park. 2020. A Field Guide to the Birds of Korea. LG Evergreen Foundation. Pyeongtaek, Korea.
  22. ME. 2023. Designation Status of Ecological and Landscape Conservation Area. Ministry of Environment. Sejong, Korea.
  23. NIBR. 2022. National List of Species of Korea. National Institute of Biological Resources. Incheon, Korea.
  24. Nichols JD and KU Karanth. 2011. Camera Traps in Animal Ecology: Methods and Analyses. Springer. Tokyo, Japan; New York, USA.
  25. Norouzzadeh MS, A Nguyen, M Kosmala, A Swanson, MS Palmer, C Packer and J Clune. 2018. Automatically identifying, counting, and describing wild animals in camera-trap images with deep learning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 115:E5716-E5725. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719367115
  26. NPRI. 2019. Park Resource Survey of Bukhansan National Park. Korea National Park Research Institute. Wonju, Korea.
  27. O'Brien TG and MF Kinnaird. 2008. A picture is worth a thousand words: the application of camera trapping to the study of birds. Bird Conserv. Int. 18:S144-S162. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959270908000348
  28. Oliver RY, F Iannarilli, J Ahumada, E Fegraus, N Flores R, Kays, T Birch, A Ranipeta, MS Rogan, YV Sica and W Jetz. 2023. Camera trapping expands the view into global biodiversity and its change. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 378: 20220232. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0232
  29. Ralph CJ, GR Geupel, P Pyle, TE Martin and DF DeSante. 1993. Handbook of Field Methods for Monitoring Landbirds. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-144-www. Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Albany, California. https://doi.org/10.2737/PSW-GTR-144
  30. Randler C and N Kalb. 2018. Distance and size matters: A comparison of six wildlife camera traps and their usefulness for wild birds. Ecol. Evol. 8:7151-7163. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4240
  31. Rich LN, CL Davis, ZJ Farris, DA Miller, JM Tucker, S Hamel, MS Farhadinia, R Steenweg, MS Di Bitetti, K Thapa, MD Kane, S Sunarto, NP Robinson, A Paviolo, P Cruz, Q Martins, N Gholikhani, A Taktehrani, J Whittington, FA Widodo, NG Yoccoz, C Wultsch, BJ Harmsen and MJ Kelly. 2017. Assessing global patterns in mammalian carnivore occupancy and richness by integrating local camera trap surveys. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 26:918-929. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12600
  32. Roncal CM, E Middendorf, A Forsyth, A Caceres, JG Blake, AMA Zambrano and EN Broadbent. 2019. Assemblage structure and dynamics of terrestrial birds in the southwest Amazon: A camera-trap case study. J. Field Ornithol. 90:203-214. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofo.12299
  33. Rowcliffe JM, C Carbone, PA Jansen, R Kays and B Kranstauber. 2011. Quantifying the sensitivity of camera traps: An adapted distance sampling approach. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2:464-476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00094.x
  34. Rowcliffe JM, J Field, ST Turvey and C Carbone. 2008. Estimating animal density using camera traps without the need for individual recognition. J. Appl. Ecol. 45:1228-1236. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20144086
  35. Seoul. 2003. Environment of Seoul. Seoul Metropolitan Government. Seoul, Korea.
  36. Seoul. 2014. Jingwan-dong Ecological and Scenery Conservation Area Advanced Change Observation Research. Seoul Metropolitan Government. Seoul, Korea.
  37. Seoul. 2022. Jingwan-dong Eological and Scenery Conservation Area Advanced Change Observation Research. Seoul Metropolitan Government. Seoul, Korea.
  38. Silveira L, AT Jacomo and JAF Diniz-Filho. 2003. Camera trap, line transect census and track surveys: A comparative evaluation. Biol. Conserv. 114:351-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00063-6
  39. Steele BB, RL Bayn Jr and CV Grant. 1984. Environmental monitoring using populations of birds and small mammals: Analyses of sampling effort. Biol. Conserv. 30:157-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(84)90064-8
  40. Tobler MW, SE Carrillo-Percastegui, RL Pitman, R Mares and G Powell. 2008. An evaluation of camera traps for inventorying large- and medium-sized terrestrial rainforest mammals. Anim. Conserv. 11:169-178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2008.00169.x
  41. Xeno-canto Foundation. 2024. Sharing Wildlife Sounds from Around the World. Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Xeno-canto Foundation. https://xeno-canto.org. Accessed August 27, 2024.