Acknowledgement
이 논문은 2023년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임 (NRF-2023S1A5C2A02095124).
References
- 김한샘 (2005). 현대국어사용빈도조사. 국립국어원.
- 김흥규, 강범모 (2008). 한국어 단어와 형태소의 사용 빈도 1500만 어절의 세종형태의미분석말뭉치기반. 서울: 고려대학교민족문화연구원.
- 배성봉, 이광오, 마스다히사시 (2016). 새로운 단어의 학습에서 형태소 처리의 영향: 개인차 연구. 한국인지과학회지, 27(2),303-323.
- 배성봉, 이광오, 박태진 (2012). 의미 투명성이 단어 학습에 미치는 영향: 사건관련전위 연구. 한국인지과학회지, 27(3), 421-439.
- 배성봉, 이광오, 박혜원 (2012). 한자어 인지와 학습에서 의미투명성의 효과. 교육 심리연구, 26(2), 607-620.
- 왕 상, 주혜리, 고성룡 (2023). 글 읽기에서 나타난 중심와주변 의미 미리보기 효과; 중국어 - 한국어 이중언어자 대상으로. 한국인지과학회지, 34(4), 315-347.
- 왕 상, 주혜리, 고성룡 (2024). 안구운동 추적을 통해 살펴본 중심와주변 정보의 의미적 관련 정도에 따른 미리보기 효과. 한국인지과학회지, 35(2), 129-159.
- 이광오, 배성봉 (2009). 한국어 음절의 표기빈도와 형태소빈도가 단어인지에 미치는 효과. 한국인지과학회지, 20(3), 309-333.
- 이광오, 이인선 (1999). 한글단어의 인지과정에서 형태소 정보처리. 한국심리학회지: 실험및인지, 11, 77-91.
- 이광오, 정진갑, 배성봉 (2007). 표기체계와 시각적 단어 인지: 한자어의 인지에서 형태소의표상과처리. 한국심리학회지: 실험, 19(4), 317-327.
- 이혜원, 김선경 (2013). 한글단어재인에서 습득연령의 영향. 한국인지과학회지, 24(4), 339-363. https://doi.org/10.19066/COGSCI.2013.24.4.003
- 코마츠요시타카 (2017). 시선 추적을 통한 일본어 읽기에서 보이는 중심와주변의 의미처리 연구, 서울대학교 박사학위논문.
- Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Anglin, J. M., Miller, G. A., & Wakefield, P. C. (1993). Vocabulary development: a morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society or Research in Child Development, 58(10), 1-186
- Ashby, J., Rayner, K., & Clifton, C. (2005). Eye movements of highly skilled and average readers: differential effects of frequency and predictability. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58(6), 1065-1086.
- Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390-412.
- Balass, M., Nelson, J. R., & Perfetti, C. A. (2010). Word learning: An ERP investigation of word experience effects on recognition and word processing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 126-140.
- Bolger, D. J., Balass, M., Landen, E., & Perfetti, C. A. (2008). Context variation and definitions in learning the meanings of words: An instance-based learning approach. Discourse Processes, 45, 122-159
- Borovsky, A., Kutas, M., & Elman, J. (2010). Learning to use words: Event-related potentials index single-shot contextual word learning. Cognition, 116(2), 289-296.
- Brysbaert, M., & Ghyselinck, M. (2006). The effect of age of acquisition: Partly frequency related, partly frequency independent. Visual Cognition,13, 992-1011.
- Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and writing, 12(3), 169-190.
- Carlisle, J. F. (2003). Morphology matters in learning to read: A commentary. Reading Psychology,24(3-4), 291-322.
- Carlisle, J. F., & Feldman, L. B. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement, Morphological aspects of Language precessing, 189-209.
- Chen, B. G., Zhou, H. X., Dunlap, S., & Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Age of acquisition effects in reading Chinese: Evidence in favour of the arbitrary mapping hypothesis. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 499-516.
- Daneman, M. (1991). Individual differences in reading skills. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Vol 2, 512-538.
- Daneman, M. (1991). Working memory as a predictor of verbal fluency. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20, 445-464.
- de Groot, A., & Keijzer, R. (2000). What is hard to learn is easy to forget: The roles of word concreteness, cognate status, and word frequency in foreign-language vocabulary learning and forgetting. Language Learning, 50, 1-56
- Ellis, A. W. & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2000). Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: Insights from connectionist networks. 1103-1123.
- Gilhooly, K. J., & Gilhooly, M. L. M. (1980). The validity of age of acquisition ratings. British Journal of Psychology, 71, 105-110.
- Havelka, J. & Tomita, I. (2006). Age of acquisition in naming Japanese words. Visual Cognition,13, 981-991.
- Ho-Min Sohn (1999). The Korean Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Kruk, R.S. & Bergman, K. (2013).The reciprocal relations between morphological processes and reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 114, 10-34.
- Kuo, L., & Anderson, R. C. (2006). Morphological awareness and learning to read: A cross-language perspective. Educational Psychologist, 41, 161-180.
- Lovett, M. W., Warren-Chaplin, P. M., Ransby, M. J., & Borden, S. L. (1990). Training the word recognition skills of reading disabled children: Treatment and transfer effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 769-780.
- Nagy, W., Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. D. (2006). Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 134-147
- Perdijk, Schreuder, & Verhoeven (2005). The role of morphological family size in word recognition: A developmental perspective. Written Language & Literacy, 8(2), 45-59.
- Perfetti, C. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 357-383.
- Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). Psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Steyvers, M. & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2005). The large-scale structure of semantic network:statistical analyses and a model of semantic growth. Cognitive Science, 29, 41-78.
- Tong, X., Deacon, S. H., Kirby, J. R., Cain, K., & Parrila, R. (2011). Morphological awareness: A key to understanding poor reading comprehension in English. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 523
- Wang, A., (2016). Cross-language parafoveal semantic processing: Evidence from Korean-Chinese bilinguals. Psychon Bull Rev, 23(1), 285-290.
- Wang, M., Koda, K., & Perfetti, C. A. (2003). Alphabetic and nonalphabetic L1 effects in English word identification: A comparison of Korean and Chinese English L2 learners. Cognition, 87(2), 129-149.
- Yan, M., Richter, E. M., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2009). Readers of Chinese extract semantic information from parafoveal words. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16(3), 561-566.
- Yan, M., Zhou, W., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2012). Lexical and sublexical semantic preview benefits in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1069-1075.
- Yang, J., Wang, S., Chen, H., Rayner, K. (2009). The Time Course of Semantic and Syntactic Processing in Chinese Sentence Comprehension: Evidence from Eye Movements. Memory & Cognition, 37, 1164-176.
- Zevin, J. D. & Seidenberg, M. S. (2002). Age of acquisition effects in word reading and other tasks. Journal of Memory & Language, 47,1-29.
- Zhou, W., Shu, H., Miller, K., & Yan, M. (2018). Reliance on orthography and phonology in reading of Chinese: A developmental study. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(2), 370-391.