DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Towards Indonesia's Future: Embracing Mobile Money Distribution with the Technology Acceptance Model Approach

  • Ricardo INDRA (Communication Department, Strategic Marketing Communications, Bina Nusantara University)
  • Received : 2023.12.02
  • Accepted : 2024.07.05
  • Published : 2024.07.30

Abstract

Purpose: The primary purpose of this study is to examine the influence of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) on the use of mobile money in Indonesia. The acceptance of technology has brought changes to society where the application of technology is aimed at identifying the best solution among the various existing alternatives. There are two types of electronic money: chip-based and server-based electronic money. Server-based electronic money is found on mobile phones. The Indonesian government has encouraged the use of electronic money and launched Less Cash Society to create a secure, efficient, and smooth payment system. Research design, data, and methodology: This study collected quantitative data from users of server-based electronic money through surveys conducted based on the sample size. The data were processed using SEM LISREL 8.70. Results: the results show that each of the TAM's fundamental elements has a significant impact. Perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness are able to encourage attitude toward using and behavioral intention to use towards actual use. Conclusions: The distribution of mobile money has a positive impact on society. Hence, mobile money providers must simplify access-recommendations made to strengthen the acceptance of mobile money via Perceived Ease of Use and Perceived Usefulness.

Keywords

References

  1. Adaba, G. B., Ayoung, D. A., & Abbott, P. (2019). Exploring the contribution of mobile money to well-being from a capability perspective. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 85(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12079
  2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
  3. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Prentice-Hall.
  4. Alfadda, H. A., & Mahdi, H. S. (2021). Measuring Students' Use of Zoom Application in Language Course Based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 50(4), 883-900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09752-1
  5. Alhassan, A., Li, L., Reddy, K., & Duppati, G. (2020). Consumer acceptance and continuance of mobile money. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 24. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v24i0.2579
  6. Ax, C., & Greve, J. (2017). Adoption of Management Accounting Innovations: Organizational Culture Compatibility and Perceived Outcomes. Management Accounting Research, 34, 59-74. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.mar.2016.07.007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2016.07.007
  7. Baganzi, R., & Lau, A. K. W. (2017). Examining trust and risk in mobile money acceptance in Uganda. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(12). https://doi.org/10. 3390/ su9122233 https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122233
  8. Bukari, C., & Koomson, I. (2020). Adoption of Mobile Money for Healthcare Utilisation and Spending in Rural Ghana. Network for Socioeconomic Research and Advancement, 20/002, 37-60.
  9. Chen, L., Gillenson, M. L., & Sherrell, D. L. (2002). Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective. Information & Management, 39(8), 705-719. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206 (01)00127-6
  10. Cocosila, M., & Trabelsi, H. (2016). An integrated value-risk investigation of contactless mobile payments adoption. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 20, 159-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2016.10.006
  11. Creswell, J. D., & Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods (Fifth Edition). SAGE Publication.
  12. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. Management Science, 35(3).
  13. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, Ricard P, W., & Paul R, . (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
  14. Davis, F. D., & Venkatesh, V. (1996). A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model- three experiments. International Journal Human Computer Studies, 45(1), 19-45.
  15. Gbongli, K., Xu, Y., & Amedjonekou, K. M. (2019). Extended Technology Acceptance Model to Predict Mobile-Based Money Acceptance and Sustainability: A Multi-Analytical Structural Equation Modeling and Neural Network Approach. Sustainability, 11(13), 3639. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133639
  16. Gichuki, C. N., & Mulu-Mutuku, M. (2018). Determinants of awareness and adoption of mobile money technologies: Evidence from women micro entrepreneursin Kenya. Women's Studies International Forum, 67, 18-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2017.11.013
  17. Granic, A., & Marangunic, N. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational context: Asystematic literature review. In British Journal of Educational Technology (Vol. 50, Issue 5, pp. 2572-2593). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864
  18. Jakhiya, M., Mittal Bishnoi, M., Purohit Professor, H., & Banasthali Vidyapith, L. (2020). Emergence and Growth of Mobile Money in Modern India: A Study on the Effect of Mobile Money. Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET), IEEE, 1-10.
  19. Kasilingam, D. L. (2020). Understanding the attitude and intention to use smartphone chatbots for shopping. Technology in Society, 62, 101280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101280
  20. Khatimah, H., & Halim, F. (2016). The effect of attitude and its decomposed, perceived behavioral control and its decomposed and awareness on intention to use e-money mobile in Indonesia. Journal of Scientific Research and Development, 3(1), 39-50., 3(1), 39-50.
  21. Kleijnen, M., Wetzels, M., & Ruyter, K. de. (2004). Consumer acceptance of wireless finance. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 8, 206-217.
  22. Koenig-Lewis, N., Palmer, A., & Moll, A. (2010). Predicting young consumers' take up of mobile banking services. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 28(5), 410-432. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652321011064917
  23. Kwon, D., Hwang, C., & Hong, S. (2015). Effect on Acceptance Intentions to Service Quality factors of Social TV : Focus on Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of the Korea Society of Digital Industry and Information Management, 11(3), 201-218. https://doi.org/10.17662/ksdim.2015.11.3.201
  24. Lashitew, A. A., van Tulder, R., & Liasse, Y. (2019). Mobile phones for financial inclusion: What explains the diffusion of mobile money innovations? Research Policy, 48(5), 1201-1215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.12.010
  25. Liebana-Cabanillas, F., Sanchez-Fernandez, J., & Munoz-Leiva, F. (2014). Antecedents of the adoption of the new mobile payment systems: The moderating effect of age. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 464-478.
  26. Mahmoud, Z. (2019). Determinants of Mobile Money Adoption. 2nd Europe - Middle East - North African Regional Conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
  27. Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 173-191. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre. 2.3.173
  28. Mesfin, W., Gronli, T.-M., Ghinea, G., & Younas, M. (2015). A Mobile Money Solution for Illiterate Users. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2015.53
  29. Min, S., So, K. K. F., & Jeong, M. (2019). Consumer Adoption of the Uber Mobile Application: Insights from Diffusion of Innovation Theory and Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 36(7), 770-783. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2018.1507866
  30. Momani, A. M., & Jamous, M. M. (2017). The Evolution of Technology Acceptance Theories. In International Journal of Contemporary Computer Research (IJCCR) (Vol. 1, Issue 1). https://ssrn.com/abstract=2971454
  31. Mombeuil, C., & Uhde, H. (2021). Relative convenience, relative advantage, perceived security, perceived privacy, and continuous use intention of China's WeChat Pay: A mixed-method two-phase design study. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102384
  32. Mugambi, A., Njunge, C., & Yang, S. C. (2014). Mobile-Money Benefit and Usage: The Case of M-PESA. 16(3), 16-21.
  33. Munoz-Leiva, F., Climent-Climent, S., & Liebana-Cabanillas, F. (2017). Determinants of intention to use the mobile banking apps: An extension of the classic TAM model. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, 21(1), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjme.2016.12.001
  34. Nan, W., Zhu, X., & Lynne Markus, M. (2021). What we know and don't know about the socioeconomic impacts of mobile money in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic literature review. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 87(2), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12155
  35. Noh, M., Jang, H., & Khongorzul, G. (2016). User Acceptance Model of Electronic Medical Record. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(41), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i41/103913
  36. Nugraheni, D. M. K., Hadisoewono, A., & Noranita, B. (2020, November 10). Continuance Intention to Use (CIU) on Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) for m-payment (Case Study: TIX ID). ICICoS 2020 - Proceeding: 4th International Conference on Informatics and Computational Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICoS51170.2020.9299100
  37. Opare, E. A. (2018). The Advantages and Disadvantages of Mobile Money on the Profitability of the Ghanaian Banking Industry. TEXILA INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 4(2), 39-46. https://doi.org/10.21522/tijmg.2015.04.02.art004
  38. Rahimi, B., Nadri, H., Afshar, H. L., & Timpka, T. (2018). A systematic review of the technology acceptance model in health informatics. In Applied Clinical Informatics (Vol. 9, Issue 3, pp. 604-634). Georg Thieme Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1668091
  39. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th Edition). The Free Press.
  40. Salloum, S. A., Qasim Mohammad Alhamad, A., Al-Emran, M., Abdel Monem, A., & Shaalan, K. (2019). Exploring students' acceptance of e-learning through the development of a comprehensive technology acceptance model. IEEE Access, 7, 128445-128462. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939467
  41. Sanchez-Prieto, J. C., Olmos-Miguelanez, S., & Garcia-Penalvo, F. J. (2017). MLearning and pre-service teachers: An assessment of the behavioral intention using an expanded TAM model. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 644-654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb. 2016.09.061
  42. Santoso, C. B., Suparta, W., Abdurachman, E., & Trisetyarso, A. (2020). Jakarta government official portal acceptance based on technology acceptance model. 2020 International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation, ICITSI 2020 - Proceedings, 270-275. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITSI50517.2020.9264916
  43. Senyo, P. K., Karanasios, S., Gozman, D., & Baba, M. (2022). FinTech ecosystem practices shaping financial inclusion: the case of mobile money in Ghana. European Journal of Information Systems, 31(1), 112-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2021.1978342
  44. Sin, K. Y., Osman, A., Salahuddin, S. N., Abdullah, S., Lim, Y. J., & Sim, C. L. (2016). Relative Advantage and Competitive Pressure towards Implementation of E-commerce: Overview of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 434-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(16)00054-x
  45. Talom, F. S. G., & Tengeh, R. K. (2020). The impact of mobile money on the financial performance of the SMEs in Douala, Cameroon. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010183
  46. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144-176. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.144
  47. Tengeh, R. K., & Gahapa Talom, F. S. (2020). Mobile Money as a Sustainable Alternative for SMEs in Less Developed Financial Markets. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040163
  48. Venkatesh, Morris, Davis, & Davis. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  49. Yang, H. 'Chris.' (2013). Bon Appetit for Apps: Young American Consumers' Acceptance of Mobile Applications. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 53(3), 85-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2013.11645635