Nuclear Engineering and Technology

Korean Nuclear Society (한국원자력학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investigation of thermal hydraulic behavior of the High Temperature Test Facility's lower plenum via large eddy simulation

  • Received : 2023.04.30
  • Accepted : 2023.07.03
  • Published : 2023.10.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis was performed using the Large Eddy Simulation (LES) model for the lower plenum of the High-Temperature Test Facility (HTTF), a ¼ scale test facility of the modular high temperature gas-cooled reactor (MHTGR) managed by Oregon State University. In most next-generation nuclear reactors, thermal stress due to thermal striping is one of the risks to be curiously considered. This is also true for HTGRs, especially since the exhaust helium gas temperature is high. In order to evaluate these risks and performance, organizations in the United States led by the OECD NEA are conducting a thermal hydraulic code benchmark for HTGR, and the test facility used for this benchmark is HTTF. HTTF can perform experiments in both normal and accident situations and provide high-quality experimental data. However, it is difficult to provide sufficient data for benchmarking through experiments, and there is a problem with the reliability of CFD analysis results based on Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes to analyze thermal hydraulic behavior without verification. To solve this problem, high-fidelity 3-D CFD analysis was performed using the LES model for HTTF. It was also verified that the LES model can properly simulate this jet mixing phenomenon via a unit cell test that provides experimental information. As a result of CFD analysis, the lower the dependency of the sub-grid scale model, the closer to the actual analysis result. In the case of unit cell test CFD analysis and HTTF CFD analysis, the volume-averaged sub-grid scale model dependency was calculated to be 13.0% and 9.16%, respectively. As a result of HTTF analysis, quantitative data of the fluid inside the HTTF lower plenum was provided in this paper. As a result of qualitative analysis, the temperature was highest at the center of the lower plenum, while the temperature fluctuation was highest near the edge of the lower plenum wall. The power spectral density of temperature was analyzed via fast Fourier transform (FFT) for specific points on the center and side of the lower plenum. FFT results did not reveal specific frequency-dominant temperature fluctuations in the center part. It was confirmed that the temperature power spectral density (PSD) at the top increased from the center to the wake. The vortex was visualized using the well-known scalar Q-criterion, and as a result, the closer to the outlet duct, the greater the influence of the mainstream, so that the inflow jet vortex was dissipated and mixed at the top of the lower plenum. Additionally, FFT analysis was performed on the support structure near the corner of the lower plenum with large temperature fluctuations, and as a result, it was confirmed that the temperature fluctuation of the flow did not have a significant effect near the corner wall. In addition, the vortices generated from the lower plenum to the outlet duct were identified in this paper. It is considered that the quantitative and qualitative results presented in this paper will serve as reference data for the benchmark.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant funded by the Korea government (MOTIE) (20214000000780, Methodology Development of High-fidelity Computational Fluid Dynamics for next generation nuclear power), (RS-2023-00243201, Global Talent Development project for Advanced SMR Core Computational Analysis Technology Development). This research made use of the resources of the High Performance Computing Center at Idaho National Laboratory, which is supported by the Office of Nuclear Energy of the U.S. Department of Energy and the Nuclear Science User Facilities under Contract No. DE-AC07-05ID14517.

References

  1. D.M. McEligot, G.E. McCreery, Fundamental Thermal Fluid Physics of High Temperature Flows in Advanced Reactor Systems, Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID, 2002. 
  2. S.J. Ball, S.E. Fisher, Next Generation Nuclear Plant Phenomena Identification and Ranking Tables (PIRTs) Volume 1: Main Report", Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 2007. 
  3. Sal, et al., Numerical investigation of potential elimination of 'hot streaking' and stratification in the VHTR lower plenum using helicoid inserts, Nucl. Eng. Des. 240 (2010) 995-1004.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.12.036
  4. M.J. Gradecka, B.G. Woods, Development of thermal mixing enhancement method for lower plenum of the High Temperature Test Facility, Nucl. Eng. Des. 305 (2016) 81-103.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.02.043
  5. D.M. McEligot, G.E. McCreery, Scaling Studies and Conceptual Experiment Designs for NGNP CFD Assessment, Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID, 2004. 
  6. K.G. Condie, G.E. McCreery, H.M. McIllroy, D.M. McEligot, Development of an Experiment for Measuring Flow Phenomena Occurring in a Lower Plenum for VHTR CFD Assessment, Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID, 2005. 
  7. W.J. Richard, Modeling strategies for unsteady turbulent flows in the lower plenum of the VHTR, Nucl. Eng. Des. 238 (2007) 482-491. 
  8. D.P. Guillen, Computational flow predictions for the lower plenum of a high-temperature, gas-cooled reactor, Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc. 95 (2006) 827-828. 
  9. B.G. Woods, OSU High Temperature Test Facility Technical Design Report, OSU-HTTF-TECH-003-R1, Rev. 1, Oregon State University, 2017. 
  10. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp, Preliminary Safety Information Document for the Standard MHTGR." HTGR-86-024, Department of Energy, 1986. 
  11. I. Gutowska, B.G. Woods, S.R. Cadell, CFD modeling of the OSU High Temperature Test Facility inlet plenum flow distribution during normal operation, NED 353 (2019), 110216. 
  12. K. Podila, Q. Chen, Coupled simulations for prismatic gas-cooled reactor, NED 395 (2022), 111858. 
  13. Siemens Digital Industries Software, Simcenter Star-CCM+ User Guide, Siemens, 2022, version 2022.1. 
  14. Y.Q. Yu, E. Merzari, Steady and unsteady calculations on thermal striping phenomena in triple-parallel jet, NED 312 (2017) 429-437. 
  15. S. Chacko, Y.M. Chung, Large-eddy simulation of thermal striping in unsteady non-isothermal triple jet, Int. J. Heat Mass Tran. 54 (2011) 4400-4409, 2011.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2011.05.002
  16. D. Tyler Landfried, Kristo Paul, Design of an experimental facility with a unit cell test section for studies of the lower plenum in prismatic high temperature gas reactors, Ann. Nucl. Energy 133 (2019) (2019) 236-24. 
  17. Corey E. Clifford, Austen D. Fradeneck, Computational study of full-scale VHTR lower plenum for turbulent mixing assessment, 2019, Annals of Nuclear Energy 134 (2019) 101-113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2019.05.055
  18. Sasan Salkhordeh, Corey Clifford, Large Eddy Simulations of scaled HTGR lower plenum for assessment of turbulent mixing, NED 334 (2018) 24-41. 
  19. Mark Kimber, John Brigham, Anirban Jana, Experimentally Validated Numerical Models of Non-isothermal Turbulent Mixing in High Temperature Reactors, United States: N. p., 2018 https://doi.org/10.2172/1461189. Web 
  20. J.E. Brdina, P.G. Huang, T.J. Coakley, Turbulence modeling validation, testing and development, NASA Tech. Memo. 110446 (1997) 147. 
  21. D.C. Wilcos, Re-assessment of the scale-determining equation for advanced turbulence models, AIAA J. 26 (1988) 1299-1310.  https://doi.org/10.2514/3.10041
  22. F.R. Menter, Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications, AIAA J. 32 (1994) 1598-1605.  https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149
  23. F. Ducros Nicoud, Subgrid-scale stress modelling based on the square of the velocity gradient tensor, Flow, Turbul. Combust. 62 (1999) 183-200.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009995426001
  24. J. Smagorinsky, General circulation experiments with the primitive equations I. The basic experiment, Mon. Weather Rev. 91 (1963) 99-164.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1963)091<0099:GCEWTP>2.3.CO;2
  25. F. Hussain, On the identification of a vortex, JFM 285 (1995) 69-94. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112095000462