DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Three dimensional reconstruction and measurement of underwater spent fuel assemblies

  • Jianping Zhao (Institute of Optics and Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences) ;
  • Shengbo He (Institute of Optics and Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences) ;
  • Li Yang (Institute of Optics and Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences) ;
  • Chang Feng (Institute of Optics and Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences) ;
  • Guoqiang Wu (Institute of Optics and Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences) ;
  • Gen Cai (Institute of Optics and Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences)
  • Received : 2022.11.04
  • Accepted : 2023.06.20
  • Published : 2023.10.25

Abstract

It is an important work to measure the dimensions of underwater spent fuel assemblies in the nuclear power industry during the overhaul, to judging whether the spent fuel assemblies can continue to be used. In this paper, a three dimensional reconstruction method for underwater spent fuel assemblies of nuclear reactor based on linear structured light is proposed, and the topography and size measurement was carried out based on the reconstructed 3D model. Multiple linear structured light sensors are used to obtain contour size data, and the shape data of the whole spent fuel assembly can be collected by one-dimensional scanning motion. In this paper, we also presented a corrected model to correct the measurement error introduced by lead-glass and water is corrected. Then, we set up an underwater measurement system for spent fuel assembly based on this method. Finally, an underwater measurement experiment is carried out to verify the 3D reconstruction ability and measurement ability of the system, and the measurement error is less than ±0.05 mm.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahlberg,4-FACE FUEL INSPECTION. https://www.ahlbergcameras.com.System.
  2. A. Sanchez Siguero, A. Sola, Capacity of the equipment family SICOM to inspect fuel elements, in: 39 Annual Meeting of Spanish Nuclear Society, 39. Reunion Anual Sociedad Nuclear Espanola, Reus, Tarragona (Spain), 2013. September 25-27.
  3. S. Sasaki, K. Abe, T. Nagamine, Measurement of deformation of FBR fuel assembly wrapper tube by an innovative technique, in: 2008 KAERI/JAEA Joint Seminar on Advanced Irradiation and PIE Technologies, Daejeon, Korea, 2008. November 5-7.
  4. P.S. Zavyalov, E.S. Senchenko, L.V. Finogenov, et al., A structured-light method for the measurement of deformations in fuel assemblies in the cooling ponds of nuclear power plants, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test. 48 (2012) 705-711. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106183091212008X
  5. J. Cho, Y. Choi, K. Jeong, et al., Measurement of nuclear fuel rod deformation using an image process technique, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 43 (2011) 133-140. https://doi.org/10.5516/NET.2011.43.2.133
  6. C. Wang, H.U. Song, C. Feng, et al., Deformation detection system of fuel assembly based on underwater binocular vision, J. Appl. Opt. 40 (2019) 58-63.
  7. J. Zhao, C. Feng, G. Cai, R. Zhang, et al., Three-dimensional reconstruction and measurement of fuel assemblies for sodium-cooled fast reactor using linear structured light, Ann. Nucl. Energy 160 (2021), 108397.
  8. R.E. Sharp, D.R. Garlick, Radiation Effects on Electronic Equipment, a Designers'/users' Guide for the Nuclear Power Industry, 1994. United Kingdom.
  9. J.R. Srour, J.W. Palko, Displacement damage effects in irradiated semiconductor devices, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 60 (2013) 1740-1766. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2013.2261316
  10. J.R. Srour, J.W. Palko, A framework for understanding displacement damage mechanisms in irradiated silicon devices, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53 (2006) 3610-3620. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2006.885796
  11. J. Bogaerts, B. Dierickx, R. Mertens, Enhanced dark current generation in proton-irradiated CMOS active pixel sensors, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 49 (2002) 1513-1521. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2002.1039695
  12. V. Goiffon, M. Estribeau, O. Marcelot, et al., Radiation effects in pinned photodiode CMOS image sensors: pixel performance degradation due to total ionizing dose, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 59 (2012) 2878-2887. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2012.2222927
  13. B. Speit, E. Radlein, G.H. Frischat, et al., Radiation resistant optical glasses, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B. 65 (1992) 384-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-583X(92)95071-X
  14. W. Li, M. Lu, The effect of added O2 on the transmittance and radiation resistance of radiation resistant glasses, Opt Express 18 (2010) 26307-26312. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.026307
  15. A. Palomer, P. Ridao, J. Forest, et al., Underwater laser scanner: ray-based model and calibration, IEEE ASME Trans. Mechatron. 24 (2019) 1986-1997. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2019.2929652
  16. A. Agrawal, S. Ramalingam, Y. Taguchi, et al., A theory of multi-layer flat refractive geometry, in: 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, IEEE, RI, USA, 2012. June 16-21.
  17. T. Treibitz, Y. Schechner, C. Kunz, et al., Flat refractive geometry, IEEE Trans. Pattern. Anal. 34 (2012) 51-65. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2011.105
  18. C.C. Wang, D. Tang, Seafloor roughness measured by a laser line scanner and a conductivity probe, IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 34 (2009) 459-465. https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2009.2026986
  19. H.R. Cui, C.F. Guo, S.L. Lan, 3D Reconstruction for Underwater Target Based on Linear Structured Light, 2014 Applied Mechanics and Materials, Switzerland, 2014, pp. 660-664.
  20. S.G. Narasimhan, S.K. Nayar, Structured light methods for underwater imaging: light stripe scanning and photometric stereo, in: Proceedings of OCEANS 2005, MTS/IEEE, Washington, USA, 2005. September 17-23.
  21. P. Risholm, T. Kirkhus, J.T. Thielemann, et al., Adaptive structured light with scatter correction for high-precision underwater 3D measurements, Sensors 19 (2019), 19051043.
  22. S. Tetlow, J. Spours, Three-dimensional measurement of underwater work sites using structured laser light, Meas. Sci. Technol. 10 (1999) 1162-1167. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/10/12/307
  23. S. Chi, Z. Xie, W. Chen, A laser line auto-scanning system for underwater 3D reconstruction, Sensors 16 (2016), 16091534.
  24. A. Palomer, P. Ridao, D. Youakim, et al., 3D laser scanner for underwater manipulation, Sensors 18 (2018), 18041086.