도시과학 (Journal of Urban Science)

인천대학교 도시과학연구원 (Urban Science Institute)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

현대 공공공간의 유형 및 공공성에 관한 사회 공간적 논의

Investigating the New Typology of Contemporary Public Spaces and Socio-Spatial Discussions on Publicness

  • 발행 : 2023.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In the process of urbanization under capitalism, new types of urban public spaces that combine 'living space' and 'economic space' play a dual role as a public sphere and a place for capital accumulation. This dual role has resulted in the multidimensional nature of the public nature of urban space, which in turn has resulted in the boundaries between 'public' and 'private' in the city becoming increasingly blurred. Therefore, this study presents an example of a continuum approach to space based on criticism of the socio-spatial debate and examines how it can be used in empirical research. The types of public spaces and the scope of publicness are evolving over time. Ultimately, this implies the need for a typology of contemporary public space and publicness that centers on questions of function, perception and ownership, which are very important for how public space is managed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bondi, L., & Rose, D. (2003). Constructing gender,constructing the urban: A review of Anglo-American feminist urban geography. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 10(3), 229-245.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369032000114000
  2. Carmona, M. (2010). Contemporary public space: Critique and classification, part one: Critique. Journal of Urban Design,15(1), 123-148.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800903435651
  3. Carr, S., Francis, M., Rivlin, L. G., & Stone, A. M. (1992). Public space. Cambridge University Press. 
  4. de Magalhaes, C. D. (2010). Public Space and the Contracting-out of Publicness: A Framework for Analysis. Journal of Urban Design, 15(4), 559-574.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2010.502347
  5. Dines, N. T., Cattell, V., Gesler, W. M., &Curtis, S. (2006). Public spaces, social relations and well-being in EastLondon. Policy Press. 
  6. Flusty, S. 1963-. (1994). Building paranoia: Theproliferation of interdictory space and the erosion of spatial justice(Vol. 1-1 online resource(1 volume (unpaged)) : illustrations, map). LosAngeles Forum for Architecture and Urban Design; WorldCat.org.http://books.google.com/books?id=K1JPAAAAMAAJ 
  7. Gehl, J., & Gemzoe, L. (2001). New city spaces.
  8. Gulick, J. (1998). The "disappearance of publics pace": An ecological Marxist and Lefebvrian Approach. The Production of Public Space, New York, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. 
  9. Hall, E. (1966). The Hidden Dimension: Man's Use ofSpace in Public and. Private, London: The Bodley Head Ltd. 
  10. Kilian, T. (1997). Public and private, power ands pace. Rowman & Littlefield Lanham. 
  11. Kohn, M. (2004). Brave new neighborhoods: The privatization of public space. Routledge. 
  12. Krier, R., & Rowe, C. (1979). Urban space. Academy editions London. 
  13. Low, S. M., & Smith, N. 1954-2012. (2006). Thepolitics of public space (Vol. 1-1 online resource (vii, 185 pages)).Routledge; WorldCat.org.http://site.ebrary.com/id/10648081 
  14. Malone, K. (2002). Street life: Youth, culture and competing uses of public space. Environment and Urbanization, 14(2),157-168.  https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780201400213
  15. Nemeth, J. (2009). Defining a Public: The Managementof Privately Owned Public Space. Urban Studies, 46(11),2463-2490.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009342903
  16. Nemeth, J., & Schmidt, S. (2007). Toward aMethodology for Measuring the Security of Publicly Accessible Spaces. Journalof the American Planning Association, 73(3), 283-297.WorldCat.org.https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360708977978 
  17. Papadakis, A., & Watson, H. (1990). Newclassicism: Omnibus volume. Academy editions. 
  18. Podmore, J. A. (2001). Lesbians in the crowd: Gender,sexuality and visibility along Montreal's Boul. St-Laurent. Gender, Placeand Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 8(4), 333-355.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09663690120111591
  19. Schenker, H. (1996). Women's and Children's Quartersin Golden Gate Park, San Francisco. Gender, Place and Culture - A Journal ofFeminist Geography, 3(3), 293-308. WorldCat.org.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09663699625577
  20. Sennett, R. (1992). The fall of public man. WWnorton & company. 
  21. Sibley, D. 1940-. (1995). Geographies of exclusion:Society and difference in the West (Vol. 1- 1 online resource (xviii, 206pages) : illustrations). New York; WorldCat.org.http://site.ebrary.com/id/10058305 
  22. Sitte, C. (1889). The art of building cities. Reinhold New York. 
  23. Sorkin, M. (1992). See you in Disneyland. Variations on a Theme Park: The New American City and the End of Public Space, 205-232. 
  24. Stavrides, S. (2016). Common space: The city ascommons. Zed Books Ltd. 
  25. Stevens, Q. (2007). The ludic city: Exploring thepotential of public spaces. Routledge. 
  26. Tivers, Jacqueline. (1985). Women attached: The daily lives of women with young children. St. Martin's Press; WorldCat.org. 
  27. Van Melik, R., Van Aalst, I., & Van Weesep, J. (2007).Fear and fantasy in the public domain: The development of secured and themedurban space. Journal of Urban Design, 12(1), 25- 42.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800601071170
  28. Varna, G., & Tiesdell, S. (2010). Assessing thePublicness of Public Space:The Star Model of Publicness. Journal of UrbanDesign, 15(4), 575-598.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2010.502350
  29. Wallin, L. (1998). The stranger on the green. Philosophyand Geography II: The Production of Public Space, 99-113. 
  30. Young, I. M. (1990). City life and difference. People,Place and Space Reader, 247-251. 
  31. Zucker, P. (1960). Town and square: From the agora tothe village green. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 19(1).