참고문헌
- Ajzen. I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hal.
- Ayanwale, M. A., Sanusi, I. T., Adelana, O. P., Aruleba, K. D., & Oyelere, S. S. (2022). Teachers' readiness and intention to teach artificial intelligence in schools. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100099
- Bae, B. (2011). Amos 19 structural equation modeling principle and practice. Cheongram
- Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 359-373. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359
- Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least squares (PLS) approach to casual modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an Illustration. Technology Studies, 2(2), 285-309.
- Bentler, P. M. (1989). EQS structural equations program manual. BMDP.
- Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1993). Testing structural equation models. Sage.
- Bourgonjon, J., De Grove, F., De Smet, C., Van Looy, J., Soetaert, R., & Valcke, M. (2013). Acceptance of game-based learning by secondary school teachers. Computers & Education, 67, 21-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.010
- Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Sage.
- Chang, C. T., Hajiyev, J., & Su, C. R. (2017). Examining the students' behavioral intention to use e-learning in Azerbaijan? The general extended technology acceptance model for e-learning approach. Computers & Education, 111, 128-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.010
- Chang, H. & Nam, J. (2021). The use of artificial intelligence in elementary mathematics education -Focusing on the math class support system "Knock-knock! Math Expedition"-. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 31(Supplement), 105-123. http://doi.org/10.20972/kjee.31..202101.105
- Chai, C. S., Wang, X., & Xu, C. (2020). An extended theory of planned behavior for the modelling of Chinese secondary school students' intention to learn artificial intelligence. Mathematics, 8(11), 2089. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8112089
- Chapman, O. (2002). Belief structure and inservice high school mathematics teacher growth. In G. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Torner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 177-193). Kluwer.
- Chiu, T. K. (2017). Introducing electronic textbooks as daily-use technology in schools: A top-down adoption process. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 524-537. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12432
- Chocarro, R., Cortinas, M., & Marcos-Matas, G. (2023). Teachers' attitudes towards chatbots in education: A technology acceptance model approach considering the effect of social language, bot proactiveness, and users' characteristics. Educational Studies, 49(2), 295-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1850426
- Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results [Doctoral dissertation, MIT Sloan School of Management].
- Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
- Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A Comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
- DeVita, M., Verschaffel, L., & Elen, J. (2012). Acceptance of interactive whiteboards by Italian mathematics teachers. Educational Research, 3(7), 553-565.
- Fearnley, M. R., & Amora, J. T. (2020). Learning management system adoption in higher education using the extended technology acceptance model. IAFOR Journal of Education, 8(2), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.8.2.05
- Gavora, P. (2010). Slovak pre-service teacher self-efficacy: Theoretical and research considerations. The New Educational Review, 21(2), 17-30.
- Gong, M., Xu, Y., & Yu, Y. (2004). An enhanced technology acceptance model for web-based learning. Journal of Information Systems Education, 15(4), 365-374.
- Gurer, M. D. (2021). Examining technology acceptance of pre-service mathematics teachers in Turkey: A structural equation modeling approach. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 4709-4729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10493-4
- Ha, J. G., Page, T., & Thorsteinsson, G. (2011). A study on technophobia and mobile device design. International Journal of Contents, 7(2), 17-25. https://doi.org/10.5392/IJoC.2011.7.2.017
- Hair, J. F., Black, W., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Pearson.
- Henson, R. K. (2001). Teacher self efficacy: Substantive implications and measurement dilemmas. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Educational, Texas A & M University.
- Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Tsai, C. M., Liu, M. C., & Lee, Y. F. (2022). Exploring teachers' attitudes toward implementing new ICT educational policies. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(10), 1823-1837. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1752740
- Hoy, A. W. (2000). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association Conference, New Orleans, LA.
- Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
- Ibili, E., Resnyansky, D., & Billinghurst, M. (2019). Applying the technology acceptance model to understand maths teachers' perceptions towards an augmented reality tutoring system. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 2653-2675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09925-z
- Johnson, D. G., & Verdicchio, M. (2017). AI anxiety. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(9), 2267-2270. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23867
- Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice teachers' intention to use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 48-59.
- Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.
- Kramarski, B., & Michalsky, T. (2010). Preparing preservice teachers for self-regulated learning in the context of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 20(5), 434-447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.05.003
- Langran, E., Searson, M., Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2020, April). AI in teacher education. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 751-756). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
- Lim, M., Kim, H. M., Nam, J., & Hong, O. (2021). Exploring the application of elementary mathematics supporting system using artificial intelligence in teaching and learning. School Mathematics, 23(2), 251-270. http://doi.org/10.29275/sm.2021.06.23.2.251
- Li, J., & Huang, J. S. (2020). Dimensions of artificial intelligence anxiety based on the integrated fear acquisition theory. Technology in Society, 63, 101410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101410
- Lin, P., & Van Brummelen, J. (2021, May). Engaging teachers to co-design integrated AI curriculum for K-12 classrooms. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-12).
- Ministry of Education (2020a). Comprehensive plan for science, mathematics, information, and STEAM education. Ministry of Education
- Ministry of Education (2020b, September 14). Artificial intelligence, into school! Artificial intelligence (AI), introduced as an elementary math study helper, as an optional course in high school. News from the Ministry of Education. https://www.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/view.do?boardID=294&board -Seq=81918&lev=0&searchType=null&statusYN=W&page=5&s=moe&m=020402&opType=N
- Moon, S. (2009). Basic concepts and application of structural equation modeling. Hakjisa.
- Mueller, J., Wood, E., Willoughby, T., Ross, C., & Specht, J. (2008). Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1523-1537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.02.003
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. NCTM.
- Park, M. (2020). Applications and possibilities of artificial intelligence in mathematics education. Communications of Mathematical Education, 34(4), 545-561. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2020.34.4.545
- Rafique, H., Ul Islam, Z., & Shamim, A. (2023). Acceptance of e-learning technology by government school teachers: Application of extended technology acceptance model. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2164783
- Saade, R. G., & Kira, D. (2009). Computer anxiety in e-learning: The effect of computer self-efficacy. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 8(1), 177-191. https://doi.org/10.28945/166
- Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers' adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
- Segars, A. H., & Grover, V. (1998). Strategic information systems planning success: An investigation of the construct and its measurement. MIS Quarterly, 22(2), 139-163.
- Seufert, S., Guggemos, J., & Sailer, M. (2021). Technology-related knowledge, skills, and attitudes of pre-and in-service teachers: The current situation and emerging trends. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106552
- Shin, D. (2020). An analysis prospective mathematics teachers' perception on the use of artificial intelligence(AI) in mathematics education. Communications of Mathematical Education, 34(3), 215-234. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2020.34.3.215
- Sinclair, J., & Aho, A. (2018). Experts on super innovators: Understanding staff adoption of learning management systems. Higher Education Research and Development, 37(1), 158-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1342609
- Teo, T. (2009). Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 52(2), 302-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006
- Teo, T., Milutinovic, V., Zhou, M., & Bankovic, D. (2017). Traditional vs. innovative uses of computers among mathematics pre-service teachers in Serbia. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(7), 811-827. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1189943
- Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783-805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
- Van Vaerenbergh, S., Perez-Suay, A., & Diago, P. D. (2023). Acceptance and intentions of using dynamic geometry software by pre-service primary school teachers. Education Sciences, 13(7), 661. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070661
- Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-365. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872
- Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451-481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb01822.x
- Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 157-178.
- Woo, J. (2012). Structural equation model concept and understanding. Hannarae.
- Yim, Y., Ahn, S., Kim, K. M., Kim, J. H., & Hong, O. (2021). The effects of an AI-based class support system on student learning: Focusing on the case of toc-toc math expedition in Korea. Korean Journal of Elementary Education, 32(4), 61-73. http://doi.org/10.20972/kjee.32.4.202112.61