Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

  • 제53권4호
  • /
  • Pages.269-282
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 2093-2278(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-2286(eISSN)
대한치주과학회 (Korean Academy of Periodontology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Efficacy of active noise-canceling headphones in patients undergoing ultrasonic scaling

  • Jeong-Woong Kim (Department of Periodontology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital) ;
  • Bo-Ah Lee (Department of Periodontology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital) ;
  • Yu-Seon Park (Department of Periodontology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital) ;
  • Jinho Chung (Department of Periodontology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital) ;
  • Seong-Ho Choi (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute of Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Young-Taek Kim (Department of Periodontology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2022.04.27
  • 심사 : 2022.08.19
  • 발행 : 2023.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: Dental fear hinders patients from receiving appropriate dental treatment. In particular, the noise generated by high-speed air turbines and ultrasonic scalers can adversely affect patients. Many efforts have been made to reduce the discomfort caused by noise, but no methods are definitively recommended. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of active noise-canceling (ANC) headphones in reducing the pain and discomfort associated with dental scaling. Methods: Fifty-five patients requiring scaling and root planing, aged ≥19 years and showing no auditory problems, were included. Scaling was performed for the bilateral maxillary molars and premolars while patients wore headphones, with ANC turned either on or off. The degree of noise and pain reduction in the on and off conditions were surveyed using a visual analog scale (VAS). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to compare noise-and pain-related discomfort with ANC turned on and off. Results: The sample included 28 men and 27 women with a mean age of 45.45±13.12 years. The average noise-related discomfort score was 3.84±2.12 and 2.95±1.99 when noise-canceling was turned off and on, respectively, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). Similarly, the average pain-related discomfort score was 3.78h±2.00 and 3.09±1.96 when noise-canceling was turned off and on, respectively, which was a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). Conclusions: The use of ANC headphones seems to reduce the discomfort caused by noise and pain in patients undergoing scaling.

키워드

과제정보

This work was supported by a grant (NHIMC2018CR059) from the National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital.

참고문헌

  1. Woolgrove J, Cumberbatch G. Dental anxiety and regularity of dental attendance. J Dent 1986;14:209-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(86)90003-5
  2. Liddell A, May B. Patients' perception of dentists' positive and negative attributes. Soc Sci Med 1984;19:839-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(84)90401-5
  3. Mellor AC. Dental anxiety and attendance in the north-west of England. J Dent 1992;20:207-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(92)90077-P
  4. Hmud R, Walsh LJ. Dental anxiety: causes, complications and management approaches. Int Dent SA 2007;9:6-16.
  5. Oosterink FM, de Jongh A, Aartman IH. What are people afraid of during dental treatment? Anxiety-provoking capacity of 67 stimuli characteristic of the dental setting. Eur J Oral Sci 2008;116:44-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2007.00500.x
  6. Domoto PK, Weinstein P, Melnick S, Ohmura M, Uchida H, Ohmachi K, et al. Results of a dental fear survey in Japan: implications for dental public health in Asia. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1988;16:199-201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1988.tb01753.x
  7. Kilpatrick HC. Decibel ratings of dental office sounds. J Prosthet Dent 1981;45:175-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(81)90336-X
  8. Messano GA, Petti S. General dental practitioners and hearing impairment. J Dent 2012;40:821-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.06.006
  9. Zubick HH, Tolentino AT, Boffa J. Hearing loss and the high speed dental handpiece. Am J Public Health 1980;70:633-5. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.70.6.633
  10. Wilson CE, Vaidyanathan TK, Cinotti WR, Cohen SM, Wang SJ. Hearing-damage risk and communication interference in dental practice. J Dent Res 1990;69:489-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690021401
  11. McGrath C, Bedi R. The association between dental anxiety and oral health-related quality of life in Britain. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2004;32:67-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2004.00119.x
  12. Wong HM, Mak CM, Xu YF. A four-part setting on examining the anxiety-provoking capacity of the sound of dental equipment. Noise Health 2011;13:385-91. https://doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.90291
  13. Yamada T, Ebisu S, Kuwano S. A questionnaire survey on the effect of the sound of dental drills on the feeling of patients in dental clinics. Acoust Sci Technol 2006;27:305-8. https://doi.org/10.1250/ast.27.305
  14. Suomi JD, Greene JC, Vermillion JR, Doyle J, Change JJ, Leatherwood EC. The effect of controlled oral hygiene procedures on the progression of periodontal disease in adults: results after third and final year. J Periodontol 1971;42:152-60. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1971.42.3.152
  15. Axelsson P, Lindhe J. The significance of maintenance care in the treatment of periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol 1981;8:281-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1981.tb02039.x
  16. Krishna R, De Stefano JA. Ultrasonic vs. hand instrumentation in periodontal therapy: clinical outcomes. Periodontol 2000 2016;71:113-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12119
  17. Suppipat N. Ultrasonics in periodontics. J Clin Periodontol 1974;1:206-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1974.tb01259.x
  18. Johnson WN, Wilson JR. The application of the ultrasonic dental unit to scaling procedures. J Periodontol 1957;28:264-71. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1957.28.4.264
  19. Clark SM. The ultrasonic dental unit: a guide for the clinical application of ultrasonics in dentistry and in dental hygiene. J Periodontol 1969;40:621-9. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1969.40.11.621
  20. Lee JS, Han YS, Cho YS. The noise level assessment of dental equipment. J Dent Hyg Sci 2015;15:603-11. https://doi.org/10.17135/jdhs.2015.15.5.603
  21. Appukuttan DP. Strategies to manage patients with dental anxiety and dental phobia: literature review. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2016;8:35-50. https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S63626
  22. Moola S, Pearson A, Hagger C. Effectiveness of music interventions on dental anxiety in paediatric and adult patients: a systematic review. JBI Libr Syst Rev 2011;9:588-630. https://doi.org/10.11124/01938924-201109180-00001
  23. Kaymak E, Atherton M, Rotter K, Millar B. Dental drill noise reduction using a combination of active noise control, passive noise control and adaptive filtering. In Proceedings of Inter-Noise 2007 Istanbul, Turkey; 2007 Aug 28-31; Istanbul. Reston (VA): Institute of Noise Control Engineering; 2007.
  24. Khemwong J, Tangsangiumvisai N. A two-step adaptive noise cancellation system for dental-drill noise reduction. Eng J (NY) 2018;22:51-66. https://doi.org/10.4186/ej.2018.22.4.51
  25. Rotter KRG, Atherton MA, Kaymak E, Millar B. Noise reduction of dental drill noise. In: Proceedings of Mechatronics 2008: 11th Mechatronics Forum Biennial International Conference; 2008 Jun 23-25; Limerick, Ireland. Limerick: University of Limerick; 2008.
  26. Canbek K, Willershausen B. Survey of the effectiveness of masking noises during dental treatment--a pilot study. Quintessence Int 2004;35:563-70.
  27. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007;39:175-91. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
  28. Stenfelt S, Goode RL. Bone-conducted sound: physiological and clinical aspects. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:1245-61. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mao.0000187236.10842.d5
  29. Stenfelt S, Hato N, Goode RL. Round window membrane motion with air conduction and bone conduction stimulation. Hear Res 2004;198:10-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2004.07.008
  30. Stenfelt S, Hato N, Goode RL. Fluid volume displacement at the oval and round windows with air and bone conduction stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am 2004;115:797-812. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1639903
  31. Kringlebotn M. The equality of volume displacements in the inner ear windows. J Acoust Soc Am 1995;98:192-6. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.413746
  32. Ozer E, Adelman C, Freeman S, Sohmer H. Bone conduction hearing on the teeth of the lower jaw. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol 2002;13:89-96. https://doi.org/10.1515/JBCPP.2002.13.2.89
  33. Quteish Taani DS. Dental anxiety and regularity of dental attendance in younger adults. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:604-8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00905.x
  34. Karibe H, Koeda M, Aoyagi-Naka K, Kato Y, Tateno A, Suzuki H, et al. Differences in the perception of dental sounds: a preliminary study. Patient Prefer Adherence 2019;13:1051-6. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S204465
  35. Kuo SM, Mitra S, Gan WS. Active noise control system for headphone applications. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol 2006;14:331-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2005.863667
  36. Kuo SM, Morgan DR. Active noise control: a tutorial review. Proc IEEE 1999;87:943-73. https://doi.org/10.1109/5.763310
  37. Rhudy JL, Meagher MW. Noise stress and human pain thresholds: divergent effects in men and women. J Pain 2001;2:57-64. https://doi.org/10.1054/jpai.2000.19947
  38. Suhara Y, Ikefuji D, Nakayama M, Nishiura T. 3pNSc8. A design of control signal in reducing discomfort of the dental treatment sound based on auditory masking. In: Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics ICA 2013; 2013 Jun 2-7; Montreal, Canada. Melville (NY): Acoustical Society of America; 2013.
  39. Ramoglu S, Tasar S, Gunsoy S, Ozan O, Meric G. Tooth-implant connection: a review. Int Sch Res Notices 2013;2013:921645.
  40. Kelekis-Cholakis A, Atout R, Hamdan N, Tsourounakis I. An introduction to understanding the basics of teeth vs. dental implants: similarities and differences. In: Peri-implant complications: a clinical guide to diagnosis and treatment. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2018. p. 1-20.