Journal of Industrial Convergence (산업융합연구)

DAEHAN Society of Industrial Management (대한산업경영학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Factors Affecting the Intention of Acceptance of the COVID-19 Antibody Test

코로나19 항체검사 수용의도에 영향을 미치는 요인

  • Yeojoo Chae (Department of Nursing, Gwangju University)
  • Received : 2023.03.16
  • Accepted : 2023.06.20
  • Published : 2023.06.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify the subjective health status, COVID-19 risk perception, antibody knowledge, social influence, intention of acceptance of the COVID-19 antibody test for general adults and the factors affecting the acceptance of the COVID-19 antibody test. The subjects of the study were 147 adults, and the collected data were analyzed using the SPSS 27.0 program using the frequency, percentage, average and standard deviation, independent t-test, ANOVA, pearson's correlation coefficients, and multiple regression analysis. The results, the acceptance of the COVID-19 antibody test has a significant static correlation with the social influence, the COVID-19 risk perception, and the negative correlation with the subjective health. The factor affecting the acceptance of the COVID-19 antibody test of the general adult was a social influence, and their explanatory power was 50.2%. As a result of this study, COVID-19 antibody tests may be used by preparing effective measures to prevent the spread of the COVID-19 infection.

본 연구는 일반 성인을 대상으로 주관적 건강상태, 코로나19 위험지각, 항체지식, 사회적 영향, 코로나19 항체검사 수용의도를 파악하고 이들의 코로나19 항체검사 수용의도에 영향을 미치는 요인을 파악하기 위하여 시도되었다. 연구 대상자는 20세 이상 성인 147명이었으며, 수집된 자료는 SPSS 27.0 프로그램을 이용하여 빈도, 백분율, 평균과 표준편차, independent t-test, ANOVA, Pearson's correlation coefficients, multiple regression analysis를 이용하여 분석하였다. 연구 결과 코로나19 항체검사 수용의도는 사회적 영향, 코로나19 위험지각과 유의미한 정적 상관관계가 있었고, 주관적 건강상태와 부적 상관관계가 있었다. 일반 성인의 코로나19 항체검사 수용의도에 영향을 미치는 요인은 사회적 영향이었으며, 이들의 설명력은 50.2%로 나타났다. 본 연구결과로 코로나19 감염확산방지를 위한 효과적인 방안 마련으로 코로나19 항체검사가 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was conducted by research funds from Gwangju University in 2023.

References

  1. Johns Hopkins University (2023). COVID-19 Dashboard by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) [sited by : https://gisanddata.maps.arcgis.com/apps/dashboards/bda7594740fd40299423467b48e9ecf6. last visited on 13 March 2023]
  2. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (2023). Coronavirus (COVID-19), Republic of Korea [sited by https://ncov.kdca.go.kr/, last visited on 13 March 2023]
  3. FDA. (2023) COVID-19 Vaccines. https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-respons e/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/covid-1 9-vaccines [Online] (13 March 2023).
  4. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (2023). National Health Research Institute, Nationwide Corona 19 antibody training rate secondary investigation results announced. [sited by https://www.kdca.go.kr/board/board.es?mid=a20501010000&bid=0015&act=view&list_no=721678, last visited on 14 March 2023]
  5. Y. Zhang et al. (2021). Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18-59 years: a randomised, doubleblind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial. Lancet Infect Dis, 21, 181-92. DOI : 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30843-4
  6. A. E. Muruato. et al. (2020). A high-throughput neutralizing antibody assay for COVID-19 diagnosis and vaccine evaluation. Nat Commun. 11, 4059. DOI : 10.1038/s41467-020-17892-0
  7. B. Bosnjak. et al (2020). Low serum neutralizing anti-SARS-CoV-2 S antibody levels in mildly affected COVID-19 convalescent patients revealed by two different detection methods. Cellular & Molecular Immunology, 18(4), 936- 944. DOI : 10.1038/s41423-020-00573-9
  8. Roche (2023). SARS CoV-2 Rapid Antibody Test 2.0. [sited by https://diagnostics.roche.com/global/en/products/params/sars-cov-2-rapid-antibody-test.html, last visited on 13 March 2023]
  9. V. Venkatesh., M. G. Morris., B. Gordon., & F. D. Davis. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology : Toward a Unified View, MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. DOI : 10.2307/30036540
  10. R. A. Bauer. (1960). Consumer Behavior as Risk Taking. American Marketing Association, 43, 384-398.
  11. S. Y. Bae., P. J. Chang. (2021). The effect of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) risk perception on behavioural intention towards 'untact' tourism in South Korea during the first wave of the pandemic (March 2020). Current Issues in Tourism, 24(7), 1017-1035. DOI : 10.1080/13683500.2020.1798895
  12. K. H. Roh., H. Choi., H. K. Choi., M. Yoon., J. Yoo., Y. Park. (2022). Antibody Detection in Healthcare Workers after Vaccination with Two Doses of the BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1 Vaccine. Annals of clinical microbiology, 25(3), 91-101. DOI : 10.5145/ACM.2022.25.3.4
  13. N. Shimasaki., J. Ishii., T. Kuwahara., H. Nishijima. (2023). A Brief Questionnaire on Healthcare Workers' Awareness Toward the COVID-19 Vaccine and Antibody Tests. Journal of Disaster Research, 18(1), 21-26. DOI : 10.20965/jdr.2023.p0021
  14. H. Sim., M. Kim., K. Jeong., J. Heo., E. Choi. (2014). Factors influencing health promotion behaviors of college students. Korean J Health Educ Promot, 31(4), 97-108. https://doi.org/10.14367/kjhep.2014.31.3.97
  15. D. L. Speake., M. E. Cowart., & K. Pellet. (1989). Health perceptions and lifestyles of the elderly. Research in Nursing & Health, 12(2), 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770120206
  16. Y. R. Kwon., & H. O. Jeon. (2013). Effects of Perceived Health Status, Self-esteem and Family Function on Expectations Regarding Aging among Middle-aged Women. J Korean Acad Nurs, 43(2), 176-184. DOI : 10.4040/jkan.2013.43.2.176
  17. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (2021). COVID-19 Q&A. [sited by https://www.kdca.go.kr/gallery.es?mid=a20503010000&bid=0002&act=view&list_no=145336(2022.07.18.) last visited on 13 March 2023]
  18. Y. J. Shim. (2018). A study on factors affecting to fintech service adoption using the UTAUT model. Doctoral dissertation, Konkuk University, Seoul.
  19. I. Ajzen., & T. J. Madden. (1986). Predication of goal-directed behavior: attitudes, intentions and perceived behavioral control. J Exp Soc Psychol 22(5), 453-474. DOI : 10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4
  20. J. L. Lee., & E. K. Lee. (2018). Factors associated with pneumococcal vaccinations in older adults. J Korean Gerontol Nurs 20(1), 1-9. DOI : 10.17079/jkgn.2018.20.1.1
  21. S. M. Kim., & C. W. Lee. (2013). Usage Intention of u-Healthcare ServiceUsing Unified Theory of Technology Adoption and Usage. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 13(12), 379-388. DOI : 10.5392/JKCA.2013.13.12.379
  22. J. Y. Lee., & M. J. Han. (2020). Exploratory Study on Searching for Factors Associated with Intention of Continuous Use and Intention of Distribution of YouTube Medical Information. Advertising Research, 126, 80-109. DOI : 10.16914/ar.2020.126.80
  23. D. L. Speake., M. E. Cowart., & K. Pellet. (1989). Healt h perceptions and lifestyles of the elderly. Research in Nursing & Health, 12(2), 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770120206
  24. S. J. Lee., X. Jin., & S. Lee. (2021). Factors Influencing COVID-19 Preventive Behaviors in Nursing Students: Knowledge, Risk Perception, Anxiety, and Depression. Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science, 23(2), 110-118. DOI : 10.7586/jkbns.2021.23.2.110
  25. W. Lee., & S. Ahn. (2022). Risk Perception and Vaccination Intention towards COVID-19 News. Korean Journal of Journalism and Communication Studies, 66(6), 388-425. DOI : 10.20879/kjjcs.2022.66.6.011