DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

금오공대 캠퍼스 건축에서 나타나는 상징에 관한 연구 - 기술이미지 구축과 공동의 기억을 중심으로 -

Exploring Symbolism of Buildings on the KIT Campus - Focusing on Constructing Images of Technology and Collective Memory -

  • 이승엽 (금오공과대학교 건축학부)
  • Lee, Seung-youp (School of Architecture, Kumoh National Institute of Technology)
  • 투고 : 2023.01.01
  • 심사 : 2023.03.08
  • 발행 : 2023.03.30

초록

This research explores diverse meanings of buildings in the Kumoh National Institute of Technology (KIT) that embody the image of cutting-edge technology. During the late 1970s, the construction of the campus was led by the state and completed quickly; it could be assumed that the buildings on the campus reflected the image of technology, which was one of the nation's goals at the time. This research suggests multiple symbolic meanings related to its campus buildings; they range from the layout of buildings to finishing materials. For instance, the glass curtain walls of the main building visualized progress and technology that produced a collective memory for those who experienced these campus buildings. Simultaneously, the school pursued energy-saving tactics through the glass curtain walls due to the two times of oil shocks that took place throughout the 1970s. Drawing on historical documents and interviews with alumni and faculties, this school seemed to have visualized the image of technology by pursuing symbolism and pragmatism through the buildings on the KIT campus producing collective memories.

키워드

과제정보

이 연구는 금오공과대학교 학술연구비로 지원되었음 (과제번호 : 202001610001)

참고문헌

  1. Casey, E. (2004). Public Memory in Place and Time, Framing Public Memory. 1st Ed., The University of Alabama Press, 32-33.
  2. Dovey, K. (2014). Framing Places: Mediating Power in Built Form. New York, Routledge, 59-61.
  3. Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, New York, Anchor, 106-112.
  4. Goldhagen, S. (2017). Welcome to Your World: How the Built Environment Shapes Our Lives, 1st ed., New York, Harper, 201.
  5. Grossman, A. (2018). 31 Unintentional Memorials: Everyday Places of Memory in Post-Transition Bucharest. Everyday Life in the Balkans. 1st Ed., Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 339.
  6. Hatuka, T. (2018). The Design of Protest: Choreographing Political Demonstrations in Public Space. 1st Ed., University of Texas Press, 2018.
  7. Hayden, D., (1997) The Power of Place: Urban Landscapes as Public History. 1st Ed., MIT press, 1997.
  8. Hosey, L. (2000). Slumming in Utopia: Protest Construction and the Iconography of Urban America. Journal of Architectural Education 53(3), 146-158. https://doi.org/10.1162/104648800564545
  9. Kim, I. (1998). Investigating the City of Kuni. Architect 7, 48.
  10. Kusno, A. (2003). Remembering/Forgetting the May Riots: Architecture, Violence, and the Making of Chinese Cultures Post-1998 Jakarta. Public Culture 15(1). 149-151. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-15-1-149
  11. Ockman, J. (2009). A Crystal World: Between reason and Spectacle. Engineered Transparency: The Technical, Visual, and Spatial Effects of Glass. 1st Ed., Princeton Architectural Press, 45-51.
  12. Olick, J. K., Vinitzky-Serioiussi, V., & Levy, D. (2011). The Collective Memory Reader. 1st ed., New York, Oxford Univeristy Press, 3.
  13. Park, G. (2005). Genes of Korean Modern Architecture. Korea, Space, 177.
  14. Park, J. (2020). What Architecture Did: Korean Modern Architecture during the Period of Development. 1st Ed., Korea, Workroom, 164.
  15. Saxon, R. (1994). Atrium Buildings: Development and Design. 1st Ed., New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 69.
  16. Sen, A., & Siverman, L. (2014). Making Place: Space and Embodiment in the City. 1st Ed., Indiana, Indiana University Press, 2.
  17. Shanken, A. M. (2002). Planning Memory: Living Memorials in the United States during World War 2, Art Bulletin, 84(1), 130.