International journal of advanced smart convergence

The Institute of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication (한국인터넷방송통신학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Music License in the Metaverse

  • Kyungsuk Kim (Department of Intellectual Property, Sangmyung University)
  • Received : 2023.10.07
  • Accepted : 2023.10.17
  • Published : 2023.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the implications of the metaverse on the music industry, focusing on copyright issues and potential solutions. It delves into the concept and characteristics of metaverse platforms, describing them as environments that immerse users in a variety of virtual experiences. A significant portion of the paper is dedicated to exploring music use and copyright infringement in the metaverse. It examines how users incorporate existing music into their content, often leading to legal challenges due to copyright infringement. The paper discusses the role of online service providers (OSPs) in this context and the legal implications of their actions. The paper also addresses the 'safe harbor' provisions for OSPs and examines the balance between protecting rights holders and limiting OSP liability. It highlights the challenges and limitations of copyright enforcement in the metaverse, especially given the unique nature of content on platforms such as Roblox. Finally, the article proposes solutions to simplify music licensing in the metaverse, suggesting a shift from property rules to liability rules and the establishment of Collective Management Organizations (CMOs) to streamline the licensing process and better protect copyright holders' interests.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by a 2023 Research Grant from Sangmyung University.

References

  1. J. Borg, "Check Out These 10 Amazing Metaverse Performances by Global Superstars", AmplifyYou, published on Nov. 25, 2022. https://me2.kr/FDOIb
  2. P. Dane, "Travis Scott made $20 million from his Fortniteperformance" VG247, published on Dec. 2, 2020. https://me2.kr/RZvSC
  3. T. Ingham, "ROBLOX SUED FOR $200M+ BY MUSIC PUBLISHERS,WHO ALLEGE COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT", MusicBusinessWorldwide, published on June. 9, 2021. https://me2.kr/NHsSo
  4. S. Kim, "The Korea Music Content Association claimed that "Roblox" copyright infringement for using unauthorized use of K-pop." Newscape, published on Jan. 14, 2022. https://me2.kr/czODu
  5. J.D.N. Dionisio III, W.G. Burns, R Gilbert "3D virtual worldsand the metaverse: current status and future possibilities", ACMComput Surv 45(3)(2013):1-38 https://doi.org/10.1145/2480741.2480751 
  6. DI.D. Han, Y. Bergs, N. Moorhouse, "Virtual reality consumer experience escapes: preparing for the metaverse", Virtual Reality 26, 1443-1458 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-022-00641-7 
  7. J. Smart et al, Metaverse Roadmap Pathways to the 3D Web, W3C (2007), pp. 5-14. https://me2.kr/pmRTL
  8. S. Ko, J.K. Jung, J.I. Kim, S.T. Shin, "Concept and Development of Metaverse", Korea Information Processing Society Review. 28(1)(Mar 01, 2021):7, p. 8. UCII410-ECN-0102-2022-500-000575041 
  9. J.S. Yoon, "A Study on the Relationships between Cyber Money Quality and Usage Intention: Focus on the Moderating Effect of Usage Frequency and Amount of Cyber Money." Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information 24(5) (May 31, 2019): 179-86. doi:10.9708/JKSCI.2019.24.05.179. 
  10. A. Taverne, "IP and the metaverse: ownership and infringement of rights", Osborne Clarke, published on Apr. 28, 2022. https://me2.kr/zxAFc 
  11. ABKCO Music Inc. et al v. Roblox Corp., U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, No. 2:21-cv-04705 
  12. P. Mezei, C. Arora, Copyright and Metaverse (May 10, 2023). Chapter 11 - Copyright and Metaverse, in Michel Cannarsa & Larry Alan Di Matteo (eds): Research Handbook on Metaverse and the Law, Edward Elgar, 2023 (Forthcoming), Available at SSRN:https://ssrn.com/abstract=4444608 
  13. Article 102(1) of the Korean Copyright Act. 
  14. Supreme Court, 2007. 1. 25, Decision 2005 Da 11626. 
  15. J.J. Hua, "Establishing certainty of internet service provider liability and safe harbor regulation.", 9 NTU L. Rev. 1 (2014), p.3. 
  16. Article 102 of the Korean Copyright Act. 
  17. F. Guzman, The Tension between Derivative Works Online Protected by Fair Use and the Takedown Provisions of the Online CopyrightInfringement Liability Limitation Act, 13 Nw. J. Tech. & Intell. Prop. 181 (2015), p. 182. https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njtip/vol13/iss2/4 
  18. Article 103 of the Korean Copyright Act. 
  19. Guzman, supra note 21, p.184-185. 
  20. Guzman, supra note 21. p. 189. 
  21. Jeffrey Cobia, The Digital Millennium Copyright Act Takedown Notice Procedure: Misuses, Abuses, and Shortcomings of the Process, 10 MINN. J.L. SCI. & TECH. 387 (2009), p.397. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mjlst/vol10/iss1/15  10/iss1/15
  22. Article 102 of the Korean Copyright Act. 
  23. Viacom Int'l v. YouTube, 676 F.3d 19, 31 (2d Cir. 2012). 
  24. Supreme Court 2019.2.28. Decision 2016da271608 
  25. Viacom Int'l v. YouTube, Inc., 676 F.3d 19, 33-34 (2nd Cir., 2012). 
  26. Class Action Complaint at 3, Schneider v. YouTube, No. 5:20-cv-04423 (N.D. Cal. Jul. 02, 2020). 
  27. KCOPA, 2022 Copyright Protection Issues Outlook Report, Korea Copyright Protection Agency (2022), pp.28-29.
  28. R.M. Felipe, "Notice and staydown' and social media: amending Article 13 of the Proposed Directive on Copyright", INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF LAW, COMPUTERS & TECHNOLOGY2019, VOL. 33, NO. 2, 187-210 https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2018.1475906 
  29. E. McDermott, "'We Want Action': Rightsholder Reps Address Platforms in IP Subcommittee Hearing, as DMCA Reform Draft Looms", IP Watch Dog (Dec. 15, 2020), https://me2.kr/hGNej 
  30. Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on copyright andrelated rights in the Digital Single Market and amending Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC (Text with EEArelevance), OJ L 130, 17.5.2019, pp. 92-125. 
  31. R. Tapscott, "Senator Tillis Releases Draft DMCA Modernization Bill". IPWatchdog.com, published on Dec.11, 2020. https://me2.kr/KooCB 
  32. Y.S. Park, "Analysis of the Implementation Status of the EU Digital Single Market Directive," Korea Copyright Council, published on Dec. 2021. 
  33. J.C. Angeles, "The EU Legal Obligations of Very Large Platforms Providing Digital Services in the Age of the Metaverse", 14 Cuadernos Derecho Transnacional 294 (2022), DOI: 10.20318/cdt.2022.7186 
  34. H. McGhee, "Reinterpreting Repeat Infringement in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act", 25 VanderbiltJournal of Entertainment and Technology Law 483 (2023) https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/jetlaw/vol25/iss3/2 
  35. D. Friedman, "A Digital Single Market, First Stop to the Metaverse: Counterlife of Copyright Protection Wanted." In: Mathis, K., Tor, A. (eds) Law and Economics of the Digital Transformation. ILEC 2023. Economic Analysis of Law in European Legal Scholarship, vol 15. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25059-0_8 
  36. B. McKinney, "Creating the Soundtrack of Our Lives: A Practical Overview of Music Licensing", 48 Tex. J. Bus. L. 1(2020), p.3. 
  37. M.S. Lee, Entertainment and Intellectual Property Law §7:47, Thomson (2020). 
  38. Nicholas Thomas DeLisa, "You(Tube), Me, and Content Id Paving the Way for Compulsory Synchronization Licensing on User-Generated Content Platforms", 81 Brook. L. Rev. 1275 (2016), p.1277. https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/blr/vol81/iss3/8 
  39. SYNC LICENSING 101, Tunecore, published on Nov. 30, 2018. https://www.tunecore.com/guides/sync-licensing-101 
  40. R.P. Merges, "Contracting into Liability Rules: Intellectual Property Rights and Collective Rights Organizations", 84 Cal. L. Rev. 1293 (1996). 
  41. J. E. Krier & S. J. Schwab, "Property Rules and Liability Rules: The Cathedral in Another Light", N.Y.U. L. Rev. 70 440 (1995), p. 443. 
  42. Merges, supra note 46, p.1296.