실천공학교육논문지 (Journal of Practical Engineering Education)

  • 제14권3호
  • /
  • Pages.573-577
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2288-405X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-4068(eISSN)
한국실천공학교육학회 (Korean Institute for Pratical Engineering Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한국형 디지털 핵심 실무인재양성훈련 프로그램의 성과 분석

Performance Analysis of Korean Digital Key Practical Talent Training Program

  • 조영복 (대전대학교 정보보안학과)
  • Young-bok Cho (Department of Information Security, Daejeon University)
  • 투고 : 2022.12.09
  • 심사 : 2022.12.19
  • 발행 : 2022.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 논문에서는 2022년 노동부 지원 한국형 디지털 핵심 인재 양성 사업(K-Digital Training) 운영이 2021년 시작되어 2022년 하반기 공모를 거쳐 403개의 훈련과정을 통해 연간 훈련 인원 3.3만명을 확보하고 있다. 이에 디지털 인재양성으로 미래산업변화에 발빠르게 대응하겠다는 국가주도 인재양성 프로그램의 분야별 학습 만족도에 대한 성과 분석결과 프로그램 전반적인 만족도는 평균 4.27로 매우 높다. 그러나 취업연계에 대한 초기 기대는 4.2에서 학습 종료시점 3.91로 낮아지고 있다. 따라서 프로그램에 참여하는 기관의 취업연계를 위한 사전 준비가 되어 있어야 지속적인 프로그램의 만족도를 향상할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

In this paper, the operation of the Korean digital key talent training project (K-Digital Training) supported by the Ministry of Labor in 2022 began in 2021, and through public offering in the second half of 2022, 403 training courses are held to secure 33,000 annual training personnel. Accordingly, because of performance analysis on learning satisfaction in each field of the state-led talent development program to respond quickly to future industrial changes by fostering digital talent, the overall satisfaction with the program was very high at 4.27 on average. However, the initial expectation for employment linkage is decreasing from 4.2 to 3.91 at the end of learning. Therefore, it is expected that the satisfaction level of the program can be continuously improved only when the organizations participating in the program are prepared in advance for employment linkage

키워드

참고문헌

  1. W. S. Kang and W. H. Kim, "Structural relationships between education and training satisfaction at work and learning dual system apprenticeships in Korea, work engagement, and turnover intention," Korean Human Resource Development Strategy Institute, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 53-86, March 2019.  https://doi.org/10.21329/khrd.2019.14.1.53
  2. T. Teo and J. Noyes, "An assessment of the influence of perceived enjoyment and attitude on the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A structural equation modeling approach," Journal of the Computers & Education," vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 1645-1653, September 2011.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.03.002
  3. J. H. Ki and D. H. Cho, "Successful strategies of the Korea New Deal in the COVID-19 Era: Focused on the education new deal," The Journal of the Korean Regional Development Association, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 27-42, 2020.  https://doi.org/10.22885/KRDA.2020.32.4.27
  4. H. J. Choi, J. I. Cho, and E. G. Shin, "A study on the exploring education facility environment agenda in the post COVID-19 Era," The Journal of Sustainable Design and Educational Environment Research, vol. 21, no. 1. pp. 11-23, March 2021.  https://doi.org/10.7743/KEGE.2021.22.1.011
  5. AI Singapore, Ai Student Outreach Programme Handbook (Version 1.4), 2022. 
  6. AI Singapore, Becoming an AI Apprentice: A Field Guide (version 3.1), 2020c. 
  7. L. Columbus, 10 Ways AI Is Improving Manufacturing In 2020. Available: https://www.forbes.com/sites/louiscolumbus/2020/05/18/10-ways-ai-is-improvingmanufacturing-in-2020/?sh=756edde91e85, 2020. 
  8. Dataflair Team, Data Science vs Artificial Intelligence-Eliminate your Doubts. Available: https://data-flair.training/blogs/data-science-vs-artificial-intelligence, 2019.