DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

기술거래플랫폼 서비스 개선방안에 대한 연구

A Study on Service Improvement Plan of Technology Trade Platform

  • 조규대 (부경대학교 기술경영전문대학원) ;
  • 홍재범 (부경대학교 경영학과)
  • Cho, Gyu-Dae (Graduate School of Management of Technology, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Hong, Jae-Bum (Department of Business Administration, Pukyong National University)
  • 투고 : 2022.08.18
  • 심사 : 2022.09.28
  • 발행 : 2022.09.30

초록

Purpose - The domestic technology trading market is composed of a technology trading platform with the participation of technology trading institutions. The institution that operates the technology trading platform provides various support for technology transaction. The purpose of this study is to suggest improvement plans through analysis of the services provided by the technology trading platform. Design/methodology/approach - TA model was built based on existing research and the importance and satisfaction of each evaluation item of the model were identified through the hierarchical analysis process and expert opinion gathering. Then importance-satisfaction correlation analysis was applied. Findings - As a result of analyzing the importance of the technology trading platform, supply technology information, technology value evaluation, and demand technology information are in order. Technology marketing and demand technology information are areas that require focus management and there are differences according to experience and low-skilled people suggest the need to improve technology value evaluation service. Research implications or Originality - This study is significant in that it evaluated the operational performance of a technology trading platform that had not been addressed for 15 years and suggested improvement measures. Initially a series of technology transaction processes such as technology value evaluation technology matching and technology commercialization support were expanded from simple information on previous technology and this study includes these changes.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 고준, 최수정, 임주동, 이길형 (2009), "온라인 기술거래 활성화 요인: 정부지정 기술거래기관을 중심으로", 인터넷전자상거래연구, 9(3), 285-312. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76539539
  2. 과학기술정책연구원 (2020), 한국기술혁신조사 제조업, 조사보고서.
  3. 기술보증기금 (2014), 기술가치평가 실무매뉴얼.
  4. 대한상공회의소 (2003), 기업의 로열티현황 및 애로조사 결과, 조사보고서.
  5. 박현우 (2002), "국내 사이버 기술시장의 효율화 방안 연구", 인터넷전자상거래연구, 2(2), 143-165. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A45015355
  6. 산업통상자원부 (2019~2020), 산업통상백서, 서울.
  7. 산업통상자원부 (2021.7.12.), 기술거래기관 및 사업화전문회사 지정 신청 공고.
  8. 서진이, 임대현, 정혜순 (2003), "온라인 기술거래의 현황분석을 통한 서비스 전략", 인터넷전자상거래연구, 3(1), 95-117. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A45015366
  9. 석명섭, 조병휘, 지일용 (2015), "특허 인용 네트워크 분석을 활용한 기술마케팅의 효과성 제고방안에 관한 연구: 다성분 나노구조 코팅재료 공정기술 사례", 한국산학기술학회논문집, 16(5), 3210-3219. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103306068 103306068
  10. 설성수 (2000), "기술가치평가의 분석 틀", 기술혁신학회지, 3(1), 5-21.
  11. 설성수, 오세경, 박현우 (2012), 기술가치평가론, 법문사, 파주.
  12. 성태경, 장동식, 김형기 (2014), 기술마케팅과 사업화, 경문사, 파주.
  13. 여인국 (2011), "기술시장 현황 및 기술거래기관 역할제고 방안", 과학기술정책, 23(3), 15-26. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100097709 100097709
  14. 특허청 (2007), 지식재산백서.
  15. 한국산업기술진흥원 (2009), 국내기업 R&D 협력 실태조사, 조사보고서.
  16. 한국산업기술진흥원 (2021), 공공연구기관 기술이전.사업화 실태조사, 조사보고서.
  17. Williams, F. and D. V. Gibson, Technology Transfer: A Communication Perspective, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications Inc., 1990.
  18. Martilla, J. A. and J. C. James (1977), "Importance-Performance Analysis," The Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297704100112
  19. Satty, T.(1972), An Eigenvalue Allocation Model for Prioritization and Planning, Energy Management and Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania.