DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

전통한옥의 평면유형에 따른 비틀림비정형 평가

Evaluation of Torsional Irregularity of Korean Traditional Timber House According to Plan Type

  • 투고 : 2022.05.27
  • 심사 : 2022.07.01
  • 발행 : 2022.07.30

초록

This paper evaluated a relationship between torsional irregularity and plan layouts of Korean traditional timber houses, Hanok. The plan types of Hanok is categorized as straight-lined, L-shaped, T-shaped, C-shaped, and closed rectangular shape. Plan types of Hanok plays an key role in determining the centers of mass and the center of stiffness. Sixty-four cases of Hanoks categorized as five plan types, that is, 24 cases for line-type, 16 cases for L-type, 7 cases for T-type, 10 cases for C-type, and 7 cases for rectangular-type were evaluated on the torsional irregularity based on plan layouts by using the software developed by the authors. The results showed that the torsional irregularity in one direction (X or Y direction) was dominant in line-type, C-type, and rectangular-type Hanoks. On the other hand, the torsional irregularity in two directions (both X and Y directions) was dominant in L-type and T-type Hanoks. The maximum eccentricity ratio for each plan type is 565% for line-type, 298% for L-type, 362% for T-type, 312% for C-type, and 211% for rectangular-type Hanok, respectively. Regardless of the plan layouts, the eccentricity ratio of most cases is ranged 100~300% in X-direction and 35~200% in Y-direction. The results can be used as the design guide for checking torsional irregularity of Hanok in early seismic design stage of Hanok.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2022년도 명지대학교 일반교원연구비 지원사업에 의하여 연구되었음

참고문헌

  1. Akhavan, M., Kheyroddin, A., & Hemmati, A. (2020). Seismic behavior of end walls in RC tall buildings with torsional irregularity. Magazine of Civil Engineering, 97(5), 9707-9707.
  2. Han, J.S., & Kim, C.J. (2005). An Experimental study on mechanical performance of tenon for analysis of structural system and modernization of traditional wooden architecture. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design Section, 21(4), 121-128.
  3. Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association(JBDPA). (2004). Seismic Diagnosis and Reinforcement Method for Wooden Houses.
  4. KDS 41 90 32 (2019). Korean design standard for small building -Traditional Timber Structure.
  5. KDS 41 17 00 (2019). Korean design standard for seismic design of building.
  6. Kim, Y.M., Lee, S.G., & Lee, S.H. (2015). Evaluation of effective lateral stiffness of a Korean-traditional wooden house with new joint types. Engineering Structures, 94, 113-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.03.008
  7. Kim, Y.M. (2017). Development of automated structural design tool for horizontal members of Hanok. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction Section, 33(4), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_SC.2017.33.4.21
  8. Kim, Y.M. (2019). An evaluation scheme of torsional irregularity for seismic design of Hanok. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Structure & Construction Section, 35(10), 191-198.
  9. Lee, M.W. (2022). Seismic Design and Retrofit of Hanok Considering Torsional Irregularity, Master's Thesis, Myongji University.
  10. Lee, M.W., & Kim, Y.M. (2020). Development of automated evaluation system for torsional irregularity of Hanok. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 36(8), 173-180. https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK.2020.36.8.173
  11. MOLIT. (2019). Korean design standard for small building - Timber structure.
  12. National Disaster Management Research Institute (NDMI). (2010). Performance Stiffness Reduction Test Wall and Joint in Wood Structure.
  13. Ozmen, G., Girgin, K., & Durgun, Y. (2014). Torsional irregularity in multi-story structures. International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering(IJASE), 6, 121-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40091-014-0070-5
  14. Shito, A., Matsumoto, S., Shimizu, H., Ohkura. T., Takahashi, H., Sakai, S., Okada, T., Miyamachi, H., Kosuga, M., Maeda, Y., Yoshimi, M., Asano, Y., & Okubo, M. (2017). Seismic velocity structure in the source region of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake sequence, Japan. Geophysical Research Letters, 44, 7766-7772. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074593