References
- Ault Jr, C. R., & Dodick, J. (2010). Tracking the Footprints Puzzle: The problematic persistence of science as process in teaching the nature and culture of science. Science Education, 94(6), 1092-1122. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20398
- Bae, S. S. (2013). The Meaning and Problems of Research Methods in Phenomenological Pedagogy. Journal of The Society of Philosophical Studies, 125, 191-214.
- Byun, T., Baek, J., Shim, H.-P., & Lee, D. (2019). An investigation on the implementation of the 'scientific inquiry experiment' of the 2015 revised curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(5), 669-679. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2019.39.5.669
- Buchwald, J. Z. (1979). The Hall effect and Maxwellian electrodynamics in the 1880's. Part I: The discovery of a new electric field. Centaurus, 23(1), 51-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0498.1979.tb00360.x
- Chang, H. (2012). Is water H2O?: Evidence, realism and pluralism (Vol. 293). Springer Science & Business Media.
- Chen, Y. C., & Qiao, X. (2020). Using students' epistemic uncertainty as a pedagogical resource to develop knowledge in argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 42(13), 2145-2180. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1813349
- Choi, C. I, & Lee, S.-K. (2016). Reconsidering the Meanings of Experiments and Instruments Based on the Analysis of Chemistry Experiments in Textbooks. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 60(4).
- Crawford, B. A. (2014). From inquiry to scientific practices in the science classroom Handbook of research on science education, volume II (pp. 529-556): Routledge.
- Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, 3rd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. The nature of insight, 18, 365-395.
- Finley, F. N. (1983). Science processes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(1), 47-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660200105
- Ford, M. (2008). 'Grasp of practice' as a reasoning resource for inquiry and nature of science understanding. Science & Education, 17(2), 147-177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9045-7
- Gee, B., & Clackson, S. G. (1992). The Origin of Practical Work in the English School Science Curriculum. School Science Review, 73(265), 79-83.
- Giorgi, A. (1985). Phenomenology and Psychological Research. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne university press.
- Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and intervening: Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science: Cambridge university press.
- Hacking, I. (1984). Experimentation and scientific realism Science and the Quest for Reality (pp. 162-181): Springer.
- Han, M. (2020). Escaping Uncertainty: Elementary Students' Emotional-Cognitive Rebuttals in the Argumentation of. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 40(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2020.40.1.1
- Hodson, D. (1996). Laboratory work as scientific method: Three decades of confusion and distortion. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28(2), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027980280201
- Kampourakis, K., & McCain, K. (2019). Uncertainty: How it makes science advance. Oxford University Press.
- Kang, J. (2021). A Phenomenological Study on the Science Anxiety Experience of Science-Gifted Middle School Students. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 41(4), 283-295. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2021.41.4.283
- Kirschner, P. A. (1992). Epistemology, practical work and academic skills in science education. Science & Education, 1(3), 273-299. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00430277
- Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (2013). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts: Princeton University Press.
- Lederman, J. S., Lederman, N. G., Bartos, S. A., Bartels, S. L., Meyer, A. A., & Schwartz, R. S. (2014). Meaningful assessment of learners' understandings about scientific inquiry-The views about scientific inquiry (VASI) questionnaire. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 65-83. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21125
- Lee, S. (2004). A Philosophical approach to experimentation. Seokwangsa.
- Lee, S.-K., Han, J., Lee, J., & Noh, T. (2015). Characteristics of Student Inquiry Found in Project-based Science Practices: Focusing on Theory-Evidence-Method Coordinations and Skills in Using Tools. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(4), 599-608. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2015.35.4.0599
- Lee, J.-W., & Oh, I. (2016). Phenomenological Study on a School Counselor's Professional Development Experience. Korean Journal of Counseling, 17(4), 351-372. https://doi.org/10.15703/kjc.17.4.201608.351
- Lee, J.-H. (2021). A self-narrative about "education" and "training" of basic military training: Reinterpretation of chemistry experiment through rethinking the concept of "training". Journal of Education & Culture (JOEC), 27(6), 715-737. https://doi.org/10.24159/JOEC.2021.27.6.715
- Lim, S. M., Yang, I.-H., Kim, S.-M., Hong, E.-J., & Lim, J.-K. (2010). Investigation on the Difficulties during Elementary Pre-service Teachers' Open-inquiry Activities. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 30(2), 291-303. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2010.30.2.291
- Lynch, M. (2017). Art and artifact in laboratory science: A study of shop work and shoptalk in a research laboratory: Routledge.
- Matthews, M. R. (2012). Changing the focus: From nature of science (NOS) to features of science (FOS) Advances in nature of science research (pp. 3-26): Springer.
- Maxwell, J. C. (1873). A treatise on electricity and magnetism (Vol. 1): Clarendon press.
- Michael, J., & Forman, A. (2006). Redefining Disciplinary Learning in Classroom Contexts.
- Millar, R., Tiberghien, A., & Marechal, J. F. L. (2002). Varieties of labwork: A way of profiling labwork tasks. In Teaching and learning in the science laboratory (pp. 9-20). Springer, Dordrecht.
- Millar, R. (2005). What is 'scientific method' and can it be taught? Teaching science (pp. 172-185): Routledge.
- National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning: National Academies Press.
- National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states: The National Academies Press Washington, DC.
- Nott, M., & Smith, R. (1995). 'Talking your way out of it', 'rigging' and 'conjuring': what science teachers do when practicals go wrong. International Journal of Science Education, 17(3), 399-410. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069950170310
- Nott, M., & Wellington, J. (1996). When the black box springs open: practical work in schools and the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 18(7), 807-818. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180706
- Oh, P. S. (2020). A Critical Review of the Skill-Based Approach to Scientific Inquiry in Science Education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 40(2), 141-150. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2020.40.2.141
- Sanderson, B. A., & Kratochvil, D. W. (1971). Science-A Process Approach, Product Development Report No. 8.
- Schwab, J. J. (1982). Science, curriculum, and liberal education: Selected essays: University of Chicago Press.
- Soler, L., Zwart, S., Lynch, M., & Israel-Jost, V. (2014). Science after the practice turn in the philosophy, history, and social studies of science: Routledge.
- Song, J. (2006). J. J. Schwab's Life and His Ideas of Science Education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 26(7), 856-869.
- Song, J., Kang, S.-J., Kwak, Y., Kim, D., Kim, S., Na, J., ... & Joung, Y. J. (2019). Contents and features of 'Korean Science Education Standards (KSES)' for the next generation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(3), 465-478. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2019.39.3.465
- The Ministry of Education. (2015). Science curriculum. Sejong: The Ministry of Education.
- Tobin, K. (1984). Avoiding cookbook science. Science Activities, 21(2), 10-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00368121.1984.9957976
- Wellington, J. (1981). What's supposed to happen, sir?: Some problems with discovery learning. The School Science Review, 63, 167-173.
- Wellington, J. (1998). Practical work in school science. Practical work in school science: Which way now, 35-51.
- Wideen, M. F. (1975). Comparison of Student Outcomes for Science-A Process Approach and Traditional Science Teaching for Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Grade Classes: A Product Evaluation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 12(1), 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660120106
- Woolnough, B. E. (1983). Exercises, Investigations and Experiences. Physics Education, 18(2), 60-63. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/18/2/305
- Woolnough, B., & Allsop, T. (1985). Practical Work in Science: Cambridge University Press.
- Yang, I.-H., Jeong, J.-S., Kwon, Y.-J., Jeong, J.-W., Hur, M., & Oh, C.-H. (2006). An intensive interview study on the process of scientists' science knowledge generation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 26(1), 88-98.