디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제20권5호
  • /
  • Pages.345-349
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

성과압박이 긍정심리자본에 미치는 영향: 중용적 사고의 조절효과를 중심으로

The Effects of Performance Pressure on Positive Psychological Capital: Focusing on the Moderating Effect of Zhongyong Thinking

  • 장준호 (호남대학교 경영학부) ;
  • 안영철 (호남대학교 대학원 경영학과)
  • Jang, Jun-ho (Dept. of Business Administration, Honam University) ;
  • An, Daniel (Dept. of Business Administration, Honam University)
  • 투고 : 2022.04.26
  • 심사 : 2022.05.20
  • 발행 : 2022.05.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 기업의 성과압박과 긍정심리자본 간의 관계에서 중용적 사고의 조절효과를 검증하는데 초점을 두었다. 특히 동양고전의 중용을 통해 부정적 효과를 완화시키는 주요한 효과를 살펴보았다. 이를 검증하기 위해 지방 소재공공기관 및 제조업과 서비스업에 종사하는 민간기업 종업원 239명의 설문자료를 토대로 실증분석을 실시하였다. 분석결과, 성과압박은 긍정심리자본에 부(-)적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 중용적 사고는 성과압박과 긍정심리자본 간의 부정적인 영향을 완화시켜주는 조절효과가 있는 것으로 밝혀졌다. 결론에서 연구요약 및 실무적 시사점, 그리고 향후 연구방향을 기술하였다.

This study focused on verifying the moderating effect of Zhongyong thinking in the relationship between performance pressure and positive psychology capital. In particular, the main effects of mitigating negative effects through the Zhongyong of Oriental classics were examined. A survey was conducted on employees of local public institutions and private enterprises engaged in manufacturing and service industries. This study was used for analysis a survey on data 239 employees. The major finding are as follows. Performance pressure was found to have a negative effect on positive psychological capital. Also, Zhongyong thinking was found to have a moderating effect that alleviated the negative impact between performance pressure and positive psychological capital. In the conclusion, practical implications, and future research directions were described.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Sitkin, S. B., See, K. E., Miller, C. C., Lawless, M. W., & Carton, A. M. (2011). The paradox of stretch goals: Organizations in pursuit of the seemingly impossible. Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 544-566. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2008.0038
  2. Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Norman, S. M., & Combs, G. J. (2006). Positive Capital Development: Toward a Micro-Intervention. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(3), 387-393. DOI: 10.1002/job.373
  3. Avey, J. B., Patera, J. L. and West, B. J(2006). The Implications of Positive Psychological Capital on Employee Absenteeism. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 13, 42-60. DOI: 10.1177/10717919070130020401
  4. Wright, T. A. (2005). The Role of Happiness in Organizational Research: Past, Present and Future Directions. in P. L. Perrewe and D.C. Ganster(Eds.), Research in Occupationa l Stress and Well-being, vol.4, Amsterdam, JAI, 225-268.
  5. Li, X., Kan, D., Liu L., She, M., & Wanh, Y. (2005). The mediating role of psychological capital on the association between occupational stress and job burnout among bank employees in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, (12)3, 2984-3001. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph120302984
  6. Eisenberger, R., & Aselage, J. (2009). Incremental effects of reward on experienced performance pressure: Positive outcomes for intrinsic interest and creativity. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 30(1), 95-117. DOI: 10.1002/job.543
  7. Zimbardo, P. G., & Leippe, M. R. (1991). The psychology of attitude change and social influence. Mcgraw-Hill Book Company.
  8. Baumeister, R. F.(1984). Choking under pressure: self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(3), 610 DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.610
  9. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F.(1988). A control-process perspective on anxiety. Anxiety Research, 1(1), 17-22. DOI: 10.1080/10615808808248217
  10. Kohn, N. W., & Smith, S. M. (2011). Collaborative fixation: Effects of others' ideas on brainstorming. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(2), 359-371. DOI: 10.1002/acp.1699
  11. Yao, X., Yang, Q., Dong, N., & Wang, L. (2010). Moderating effect of Zhong Yong on the relationship between creativity and innovation behavior. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13(1), 53-57. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-839X.2010.01300.x
  12. Yao, X., Yang, Q., Dong, N., & Wang, L. (2010). Moderating effect of Zhong Yong on the relationship between creativity and innovation behavior. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 53-57. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-839X.2010.01300.x
  13. M. S. Mitchell,, M. D. Baer, M. L. Ambrose, R. Folger & N. F. Palmer. (2018). Cheating under pressure: A self-protection model of workplace cheating behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(1), 54-73. DOI: 10.1037/apl0000254
  14. F. Luthans, B. J. Avolio, J. B. Avey & S. M. Norman. (2007). Positive psychology capital: measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 541-572. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00083.x
  15. D. An. (2018). Adaptive functions of Zhongyong: Development of the Zhongyong questionnaire and Zhongyong attitude cultivating program. Unpublished doctoral disseration. Seoul National University.