Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science (한국비블리아학회지)

Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science (한국비블리아학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Cataloging Trends after LRM and its Acceptance in KORMARC Bibliographic Format

LRM 이후 목록 동향과 KORMARC 통합서지용에서의 수용 방안

  • 이미화 (공주대학교 문헌정보교육과 및 학교도서관연구소) ;
  • 이은주 (동의대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 노지현 (부산대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2022.02.09
  • Accepted : 2022.02.25
  • Published : 2022.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was to develop KORMARC-bibliographic format reflecting cataloging trends after LRM using literature review, analysis of MARC 21 discussion papers, and comparison of the fields in MARC 21 and KORMARC. The acceptance and consideration of fields and sub-fields that need to be revised in KORMARC are as follows. First, in terms of LRM / RDA, fields 381 or 387 for the representative expression, field 881 and the change and addition of its sub-fields for the manifestation statement, and data provenance code to ▾7 sub-field for date provenance may be considered. Second, in terms of Linked Data, ▾1 sub-field for RWO, and field 758 for related work identifier can be added. Third, for the data exchange of KORMARC and BIBFRAME, it should be developed in consideration of mapping with BIBFRAME classes and attributes in KORMARC. Fourth, additional fields such as 251 version information, 334 mode of issuance, 335 expansion plan, 341 accessibility content, 348 format of notated music, 353 supplementary content characteristics, 532 accessibility note, 370 associated place, 385 audience characteristics, 386 creator/contributor characteristics, 388 time period of creation, 688 subject added entry-type of entity unspecified, 884 description conversion information, 885 matching information could be developed. This study will be used to revise KORMARC-bibliographic format and to build and utilize bibliographic data in domestic libraries.

이 연구는 LRM 이후의 목록 동향을 반영한 KORMARC-통합서지용의 수용 방안을 마련하기 위한 것이다. 이를 위해 LRM 이후의 목록 동향에 관한 문헌연구, MARC 21 토론문서 분석, MARC 21과 KORMARC의 필드를 비교분석하였다. 그 결과 KORMARC에서 개정이 필요한 필드 및 식별기호의 수용방안 및 고려사항은 다음과 같다. 첫째, LRM/RDA 반영 측면에서 대표표현형은 381 혹은 387 필드를 확장하고, 구현형서술은 881 필드와 그 식별기호를 변경 및 추가하고, 데이터출처는 ▾7 식별기호에 해당하는 데이터출처 코드를 사용해 기술할 것을 제안하였다. 둘째, 링크드데이터 측면에서 RWO를 위해 식별기호 ▾1을 추가하고, 관련 저작 식별자 기술을 위해 758 식별기호를 신설할 것을 제안하였다. 셋째, KORMARC와 BIBFRAME의 데이터 상호연계를 위해 KORMARC 개발시 BIBFRAME 클래스와 속성과의 매핑을 고려할 것을 제안하였다. 넷째, 그 외에도 251 버전정보, 335 확장계획, 341 내용접근성, 348 악보 특성, 353 부록 특성, 532 접근성 주기, 370 관련 장소, 385 이용대상자 특성, 386 창작자/기여자 특성, 388 창작기간, 688 주제명부출표목-구체화되지 않은 개체의 유형, 884 변환정보, 885 매칭정보를 위해 필드를 추가 개발할 필요가 있다. 이 연구는 KORMARC-통합서지용 개정 및 국내 도서관의 표준 서지데이터 구축 및 활용에 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee, M. (2019). Considerations for BIBFRAME acceptance of expression and representative expression attributes in LRM. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 30(2), 33-50. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2019.30.2.033
  2. Lee, M. (2021). A Study on considerations in the authority control to accommodate LRM nomen. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 52(1), 109-128. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.52.1.202103.109
  3. Lee, S. & Lee, J. (2018). Study on Conversion between MARC 21 and BIBFRAME 2.0. Journal of Social Science, 29(3), 73-93. https://doi.org/10.16881/jss.2018.07.29.3.73
  4. ALA, Canadian Federation of Library Associations, & CILIP (2020). RDA Toolkit. Available: http://www.rdatoolkit.org/
  5. Frank, P. (2017, October 30). Interview by Author [Voice Recording and Author Paper]
  6. Glennan, K. (2018). Representative Expression. Available: http://www.rda-rsc.org/sites/all/files/Representative%20expressions.pdf
  7. Glennan, K. (2019a). The New RDA Toolkit: Everything Has Changed or Has It?. Available: http://www.rda-rsc.org/sites/all/files/Glennan%20RDA%20TK%20-%20everything%20has%20changed%20Feb%202019.pdf
  8. Glennan, K. (2019b). RDA 3R Project: Stabilization Phase. Available: http://www.rda-rsc.org/sites/all/files/3R%20Stabilization%20Phase%20Glennan%20PCC%20OpCo.pdf
  9. Glennan, K. (2019c). Getting a Handle on the New RDA Toolkit. Available: http://www.rda-rsc.org/sites/all/files/Getting%20a%20Handle%20on%20the%20New%20RDA%20Toolkit%20rev.pdf
  10. Library of Congress (2021). MARC21 to BIBFRAME 2.0 Conversion Specifications Available: https://www.loc.gov/bibframe/mtbf/
  11. Library of Congress. Network Development and MARC Standards Office (2021a). MARC 21 Format for Bibliographic Data. Available: https://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/
  12. Library of Congress. Network Development and MARC Standards Office (2021b). MARC Discussion Papers. Available: https://www.loc.gov/marc/mac/list-dp.html
  13. McCallum, S. (2017). BIBFRAME Development. JLIS.it, 8(3), 71-85. Available: https://doi.org/10.4403/jlis.it-12415
  14. Mitchell, E. T. (2013). Three case studies in linked open data. Library Technology Reports, 2013(July), 26-43.
  15. Riva, P., Boeuf, P. L., & Zumer, M. (2017a). IFLA Library Reference Model. 이미화 번역 (2020). IFLA 도서관 참조 모형. 서울: 국립중앙도서관. Available: https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbr-lrm/ifla-lrm-august-2017_rev201712-ko.pdf
  16. Riva, P., Boeuf, P. L., & Zumer, M. (2017b). Transition Mapping: User Tasks, Entities, Attributes, and Relationships in FRBR, FRAD, and FRSAD Mapped to Their Equivalents in the IFLA Library Reference Model. Available: https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbr-lrm/transitionmappings201708.pdf
  17. Young, T. (2019, Jully 22). Data Provenance. Reseouce Description & Access. Available: https://www.slideshare.net/ALAeLearningSolutions/special-topics-data-provenance