DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Online User Instruction on Information Literacy Ability: Suggestions for COVID-19 Era

코로나 시대의 온라인 도서관 이용교육이 정보활용능력에 미치는 영향

  • 박연경 (성균관대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 이용정 (성균관대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2021.08.24
  • Accepted : 2021.09.23
  • Published : 2021.09.30

Abstract

Due to COVID-19, user instruction programs could not be conducted face-to-face, and the sessions have been moved online. The present study attempted to investigate how online user instruction influences the information literacy ability of college students. The study randomly selected college students (N=50) who completed online user instruction sessions and college college students (N=50) who did not complete them among freshment who went to to college in 2020 to measure their information literacy abilities. For this study, a tool for measuring information literacy abilities was developed by referring to several previous studies. The measurement results were analyzed by the independent samples t-test, and significant differences were found between students who completed online user instruction sessions and those who did not. The findings of the study have confirmed that it is effective in enhancing library users' information literacy abilities to provide user instruction online under the COVID-19 situation, and even in post-COVID 19 times, which helps them appropriately utilize the characteristics of digital libraries. The information literacy measurement tool used in the present study was developed to evaluate online information literacy, and thus contributed to the extension of the literature of digital information literacy and user instruction. The present study provided practical implications for how academic libraries will promote information services to cope with environmental changes in which contact-free (untact) services are obliged.

대학도서관은 코로나-19로 인해 이용자 교육 프로그램을 대면으로 진행할 수 없었기 때문에 온라인으로 전환하게 되었다. 본 연구는 온라인 이용자 교육이 대학생의 정보 활용 능력에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지를 조사하고자 하였다. 코로나-19의 발생 직후인 2020년에 대학에 진학한 신입생들을 대상으로 정보 활용 교육의 효과성을 측정하기 위해 이들 중 온라인 이용자 교육을 이수한 대학생(N=50)과 이수하지 않은 대학생(N=50)을 무작위로 선정하였다. 선행 연구들을 참고하여 본 연구를 진행하는데 필요한 정보 활용 능력 측정 도구를 개발하였다. 두 대학생 집단 간의 정보 활용 능력 측정 결과를 비교하기 위해 독립표본 t-검정을 실시하였으며, 그 결과 온라인 이용자 교육을 이수한 학생과 그렇지 않은 학생의 정보활용능력에 유의한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 연구 결과는 코로나-19 상황뿐 아니라 포스트 코로나19 시대에도 비대면 온라인 이용자 교육을 제공하는 것이 도서관 이용자의 정보 활용 능력을 향상시키고 디지털도서관의 특성을 적절하게 활용할 수 있도록 도와주는 데 효과적임을 확인시켰다. 본 연구에서 사용된 정보 활용 능력 측정 도구는 온라인 정보 활용 능력을 평가하기 위해 개발되었으며, 이는 디지털 정보 활용 능력 및 이용자 교육에 관한 연구의 확장에 기여하였으며, 또한 비접촉(언택트) 서비스가 의무화된 환경변화에 대처하면서 학술도서관이 어떻게 정보서비스를 촉진시킬 것인지에 대한 실질적인 함의를 제공하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Chung, Jae-Young (2008). A study on the web-based information literacy model development for university libraries. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 39(1), 195-217. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.39.1.200803.195
  2. Hahm, Myung-Sik (2008). A study on the 'Information and the Library' curriculum and the roles of teacher-librarians. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 42(3), 169-188. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2008.42.3.169
  3. Jo, Meanjung & Gu, Meeok (2018). Convergence study of influence of nursing information literacy competency on problem solving ability, self-directed learning ability and clinical performance ability in nursing students. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 9(12), 495-507. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2018.9.12.495
  4. Jung, Young-Mi (2009). Information literacy education and the impact of self awareness on information literacy and libraries. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 43(4), 265-280. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2009.43.4.265
  5. Kang, Bong-Suk (2018). A case study on school library educational services to reduce the information literacy gap due to the education gap. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 49(3), 307-329. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.49.3.201809.307
  6. Kim, Sung-Een & Lee, Myeong-Hee (2007) An exploratory study on the effectiveness of information literacy education for college students. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 38(3), 91-115. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.38.3.200709.91
  7. Kim, Sung-Jun (2011). A study on the development of information literacy textbook, school library and information literacy. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 42(3), 271-292. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.42.3.201109.271
  8. Lee, Jung-Yeoun & Jung, Dong-Youl (2005). A study on the development of evaluation model for undergraduate students information literacy. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 22(4), 39-59. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2005.22.4.039
  9. Ministry of Education (2019, November 3). Online school starts for the first time in elementary, middle, high school, and special new semesters. Available: https://www.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/view.do?boardID=294&boardSeq=80160&lev=0&searchType=null&statusYN=W&page=1&s=moe&m=020402&opType=N
  10. Noh, Younghee, Knag, Pil Soo, & Kim, Yoon-Jeong (2020). A study on activation measures of library's online services to overcome COVID-19. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 51(4), 185-210. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.51.4.202012.185
  11. Park, juhyeon (2018). A study on the direction of reading and information service through analysis of digital reading and information literacy competencies evaluation items: focusing on PIAAC and PISA. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 52(3), 61-89.
  12. Park, Tae-Yeon & Oh, Hyo-Jung (2020). A study on library service in the Post-COVID era through issues on media. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 51(3), 251-279. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.51.3.202009.251
  13. Song, Myungjin (2019). Information literacy and writing education for college freshman. The Korean Journal of Literacy Research, 10(2), 45-69. https://doi.org/10.37736/kjlr.2019.04.10.2.45
  14. Americna Library Association (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education. Available: https://alair.ala.org/bitstream/handle/11213/7668/ACRL%20Information%20Literacy%20Competency%20Standards%20for%20Higher%20Education.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=yBlake.
  15. Association of College and Research Libraries (1996-2021). Framework for information literacy for higher education. Available: https://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework
  16. Blake, J., Bowles-Terry, M., Pearson, N. S., & Szentkiralyi, Z. (2017). The impact of information literacy instruction on student success: a multi-institutional investigation and analysis. Southern Methodist University, United States.
  17. Detlor, B., Julien, H., Willson, R., Serenko, A., & Lavallee, M. (2011). Learning outcomes of information literacy instruction at business schools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(3), 572-585. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21474
  18. Erlinger, A. (2018). Outcomes assessment in undergraduate information literacy instruction: a systematic review. College & Research Libraries, 79(4), 442-449. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.79.4.442
  19. Gotschall, T., Gillum, S., Herrings, P., Lambert, C., Collins, R., & Dexter, N. (2021). When one library door closes, another virtual one opens: a team response to the remote library. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 40(1), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.1300/J115v04n01_02
  20. Gross, D. E. (2009). Assessment of Information Literacy Instruction. Master's thesis, San Jose State University, United States.
  21. Hofer, A. R., Hanick, S. L., & Townsend, L. (2018). Transforming Information Literacy Instruction: Threshold Concepts in Theory and Practice. California: ABC-CLIO
  22. Howes, L., Ferrell, L., Pettys, G., & Roloff, A. (2021). Adapting to remote library services during COVID-19. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 40(1), 35-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2021.1873616
  23. Hsjeh, M. L. & Holden, H. A. (2010). The effectiveness of a university's single-session information literacy instruction. Reference Services Review, 38(3), 458-473. https://doi.org/10.1108/00907321011070937
  24. Hunt, S. (2019). Student demographics as a lens on library usage patterns and confidence in information literacy. Doctoral dissertation, California State University Channel Islands.
  25. Julien, H., Gross, M., & Latham, D. (2018). Survey of information literacy instructional practices in US academic libraries. College & Research Libraries, 79(2), 179-199. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.79.2.179
  26. Lanning, S. (2017). Concise Guide to Information Literacy. California: ABC-CLIO
  27. Mehta, D. & Wang, X. (2020). COVID-19 and digital library services-a case study of a university library. Digital Library Perspectives, 36(4), 351-363. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-05-2020-0030
  28. Norman, C. D. & Skinners, H. A. (2006). eHEALS: the eHealth literacy scale. Medical Internet Research, 8(4), e27. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8.4.e27
  29. O'Hanlon, N. (2007). Information literacy in the university curriculum: challenges for outcomes assessment. protal: Libraries and the Academy, 7(2), 169-189. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2007.0021
  30. Stowe, B. (2013). Designing and implementing an information literacy instruction outcomes assessment program. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 20(3-4), 242-276. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2013.829363
  31. Weeks, A., Houk, K. M., Nugent, R. L., Corn, M., & Lackey, M. (2020). UNLV health sciences library's initial response to the COVID-19 pandemic: how a versatile environment, oneline technologies, and liaison expertise prepared library faculty in supporting its user communities. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 39(4), 344-358. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2020.1826197
  32. Yager, Z., Salisbury, F., & Kirkman, L. (2013). Assessement fo information literacy skills among first year students. Student Success, 4(1), 59-71.