DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Developing a Practical Course Model for the Personality Education in a Theological University

신학대학교에서 성품 교육을 위한 실천적 코스 모델 개발

  • Received : 2021.05.12
  • Accepted : 2021.06.28
  • Published : 2021.06.30

Abstract

This study is purposed to prepare students in theological universities so that they contribute to their faith community as well as the broader social community in future through developing a practical course model for education of character formation. Facing the challenge of a high-tech revolution being progressed globally in this period, theological seminaries as the Christian-affiliated institute of higher education see the necessity to nurture their learners' competency of holistic personality comprehending cognitive, affective, behavioral, and more spiritual maturity as well as specialty in each subject matter. The holistic character capability of seminarians is closely related not only to their own self-realization, but also social community's well-being. This research had the following content and results. Chapter 1 brought up a subject to educational needs of the holistic character formation in the theological seminaries to meet the rapidly changing times. Chapter 2 considered the importance of character formation in the curriculum of the universities and theological seminaries in the times of high-tech revolution through the literature reviews related to. Chapter 3 clarified the elements of character education to be placed emphasis on theological seminaries and established the way of course planning. Chapter 4, using a course of Christian social education for illustration, described in order the whole process of course planning comprehending the need of planning, description of course concept, establishment and definition of learning outcomes, organization of learning experience(course content), teaching-learning activities, evaluation of learning outcome, and course improvement, which was visualized with the chart of the process of course design. Also, it provided a practical illustration of the conceptual map, an outline of content and an organization of units, and scope-sequence chart. Finally, chapter 5 gave an syllabus example in an integrative and digestive form as the course plan to be distributed to the students, which is the final result produced through the whole process of course planning. This research is intended not to present a overall curriculum planning of the university-level in the theological seminaries, but to develop a course-level curriculum focused on the formation of character. The author hope that this study would be used as a guideline in developing a course model to nurture the capability of the learners' holistic character.

본 연구의 목적은 신학대학교에서 성품 교육을 위한 구체적인 코스 모델의 개발을 통하여 학습자들이 장차 신앙 공동체 및 나아가 전체 사회 공동체에 기여할 수 있는 역량을 갖추도록 돕기 위함이다. 고도의 기술 혁명과 더불어 국내외적으로 진행되는 시대적 변화의 도전 앞에서, 기독교 고등 종교 교육기관으로서의 신학대학교는 개별 학습자의 교과에 대한 전문성과 더불어 지정의 차원 나아가 영적 성숙을 포괄하는 전인적인 성품 역량을 육성할 필요가 있다. 신학대학교 학습자의 성품 역량은 학습자 개인의 자아실현뿐 아니라 신앙 공동체는 물론 사회 공동체의 복지와 연결되어 있다. 이를 위해 본 연구는 1장에서 오늘의 새로운 시대적 변화에 대응하여 신학대학교에서의 성품 교육의 필요성에 대해 문제를 제기하고, 2장에서 선행 연구의 고찰을 통해 고도의 기술 혁명 시대에 고등 교육 기관에서 성품 교육 커리큘럼의 중요성과 필요성에 대한 인식을 고찰하였다. 3장에서는 신학대학교에서 초점을 두어야 할 성품 교육의 요소들과 코스의 방향 설정에 대해 살펴보았다. 4장에서는 성품 교육을 위한 코스 설계(디자인)의 전 과정-기획의 필요성 수립 및 방향 결정, 코스의 개념 진술, 교육 목표 및 학습 목표의 설정과 진술, 학습경험(내용) 조직, 교수-학습 활동, 학습성과 평가 및 코스의 개선에 이르는 과정-을 '기독교 사회교육론' 학과를 예시로 들어 순차적으로 서술하였다. 코스 디자인 과정표를 통하여 코스 개발의 전 과정을 시각화하고, 개념지도, 내용 개요 및 단원의 조직 과정, 스코프-씨퀀스 챠트의 실천적 예시를 제공하였다. 5장에서는 위의 모든 과정을 총괄하여 학생들에게 제공되는 수업계획서 즉 실라버스의 주요 구성 요소를 통합적이고 축약적인 방식으로 예시하였다. 본 연구는 신학대학교의 전체 아카데믹 프로그램의 커리큘럼 평가와 설계가 아니라 개별 코스 개발에 대한 연구로써 학생들의 성품 교육을 위한 구체적인 수업 기획과정의 모델을 연구한 것이다. 본서의 시도가 기독교 고등 종교 교육기관에서 학습자의 성품 역량을 지향하는 코스 개발에 있어 하나의 방법론으로서 참고가 될 수 있기를 기대한다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2019년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2019S1A5B5A07107138)

References

  1. Kang. B. G., Park. S. H., Choi. M. R. (2010). Curriculum and evaluation. Seoul: Taeyoung Press.
  2. Kang. Y. T. (2011). A study on ways of religious education in Christian schools. Journal of Christian Education in Korea, 27, 193-216.
  3. Seung. H. S. (2018). A study on the Christian personality education for the restoration of trust in the church. Journal of Christian Education in Korea, 2, 369-402.
  4. Shin. J. H. (2012). The theory and practice of curriculum. Seoul: Taeyoung Press.
  5. Yang. Sunny (2017). Character-trait required in 4th industrial revolution era - Sentiment based on imagination and sympathy-. Studies in Philosophy East-West, Journal of Christian Education in Korea, 86, 495-517.
  6. You. Y. G. (2015). Analysis on the empathic capacity and communication skills of the Korean church. Journal of Christian Education in Korea, 42, 47-71.
  7. Yook. J. K. (2017). The effect of liberal education for personality enhancement on core competency. Character Education, 11(3), 24-36.
  8. Yoon. H. S. (2015). An approach of the church education based on communication and empahthy. Journal of Christian Education in Korea, 42, 73-100. https://doi.org/10.17968/jcek.2015..42.004
  9. Lee. G. M. (2011). A study on reshaping theological education for personality. Journal of Christian Education in Korea, 27, 125-154.
  10. Lim. C. H. (2018). Rethinking the direction of Christian education in the 4th industrial revolution era. Journal of Christian Education in Korea, 56, 11-44.
  11. Lim. J. H., Yoo. K. H., Kim, B. C. (2017). An exploratory study on the direction of education and teacher competencies in the 4th industrial revolution. Journal of Korean Education, 44(2), 5-32.
  12. Chang. H. S. (2013). Curriculum diagnosis of Christian education and proposal: A case of Christian education department of A university. Journal of Christian Education in Korea, 33, 121-143. https://doi.org/10.17968/jcek.2013..33.005
  13. Gee. H. A. (2017). A study for direction of the character education in university according to the 4th industrial revolution era. Korean Journal of General Education. 11(6), 39-61.
  14. Han. D. S. (2016). University education and contents in the 4th industrial revolution. Humanistic Contents. 42, 10-23.
  15. Hong. H. J. (2015). Curriculum understanding & development. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  16. Diamond, R. M. (1988). Designing and assessing courses and curricula: A practical guide. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  17. Evers, F, & Wolstenhome, J. (2007). Integrating knowledge, skills, and values into the curriculum. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 112, 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.300
  18. Farrely, T. M. (1993). A new approach to moral education: The integrated character education model. Journal of Correctional Education, 44(2), 76-82.
  19. Fan, Y, Zhnag, X., & Xie, X. (2015). Design and development of a course in professionalism and ethics for CDIO curriculum in China. Science & Engineering Ethics, 21(5), 1381-1389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9592-2
  20. Ford, L. (1991). A curriculum design manual for theological education. Nashville, TN: Broadman Press.
  21. Golinkoff, R. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2018) Becoming brilliant. (Kim. S. A. Trans) Seoul: Yemun Archive. (Original work published 2016)
  22. Hermann, T., & Leggett, T. (2019). Curriculum Mapping: Aligning content and design. Radiologic Technology, 90(5), 530-533.
  23. Heywood, D. (2013). Educating ministers of character: Building character into learning process in ministerial formation. Journal of Adult Theological Education, 10(1), 4-24. https://doi.org/10.1179/1740714113Z.0000000001
  24. Jeong, C. (2005). Formulating a developmentally appropriate and culturally sensitive program of moral education - A Korean example. The Social Studies, March/April, 79-85.
  25. Mckin, R. L., & Fortune, J. C. (1987). Curriculum building: Knowledge, learning and the design of curriculum. Education, 108(1), 220-26.
  26. McNeil, J. D. (2002). Curriculum : a comprehensive introduction. (Jeon. S. Y., Lee. H. J. Trans) Seoul: Hakjisa (Original work published 1977)
  27. Posner, G. J., & Rudnitsky, A. H.(2001). Course Design: A guide to curriculum development for teachers(6th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Longman.
  28. Randolph, D, Duffy, E, & Mattingly, K. (2007). The 3P's of curriculum redesign: Principles, personal qualities, and process. Independent School, 66(3), 86-92.
  29. Savic, M., & Kashef, M. (2013). Learning outcomes in affective domain within contemporary architectural curricula. International Journal of Technology & Design Education, 23(4), 987-1004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-013-9238-8
  30. Sanchez. R. T. (2005). Facing the challenge of character education. International Journal of Social Education, 19(2), 106-113.
  31. Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution (K. J. Song. Trans.) (Original work published 2019)
  32. Yount, W. R. (1996). Created to learn. Nashville, TN: Broadman & Holman.