정보화정책 (Informatization Policy)

한국지능정보사회진흥원 (National Information Society Agency)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

'정보격차' 연구에 대한 검토와 미래 연구 방향

A Critical Review of 'Digital Divide' Research: Trend, Shortcomings and Future Directions

  • 투고 : 2021.11.01
  • 심사 : 2021.11.17
  • 발행 : 2021.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

'정보격차'는 공유성, 이전성 및 복제성과 같이 평등화에 기여함직한 정보의 내재적 속성에 반하는 정보화 시대의 예기치 않은 역기능으로 간주되어 학술적으로나 사회적으로 주목받아 왔다. 더구나 그것이 정보의 불균등한 분포로 그치는 것이 아니라 경제적, 사회적, 문화적 불평등과 맞물려 사회체계의 안정성을 해치는 요소가 될 수 있다는 문제의식은 정보격차에 관한 연구를 촉진시켜 왔다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 (1) 1970년 이후 국내외에서 수행된 정보격차 연구들을 총괄적으로 일람하고, (2) 상론할 가치가 높다고 판단되는 연구물들을 섭렵해 정보격차 담론의 성과와 한계를 검토한 후, (3) 정보격차 연구의 새로운 과제와 방향을 탐지하였다. 그 결과, 학계 안팎에서 의미 있는 성과가 축적되어 왔음이 확인되었으나, 순수연구와 정책연구 간의 괴리 및 시대 변화에 뒤진 '지적 지체' 현상이 한계점으로 드러났다. 아울러 지능정보화 시대에는 운용격차, 선정격차 및 증강격차가 정보격차 연구의 새로운 의제로 대두할 것임을 밝힐 수 있었다.

The 'digital divide' is regarded as a latent dysfunction that impedes the intrinsic role of information to contribute to social equality. Therefore, it has drawn great attention inside and outside of academia. The growing interest in the digital divide has been driven by the realization that it can create a serious crisis that threatens a social system compounded by existing economic, social, and cultural inequality, rather than being limited to an uneven distribution of information. In this paper (1) studies on the digital divide published since 1970 are reviewed, (2) studies noteworthy of discussion are selected to assess their academic significance, and (3) the tasks and prospects of digital divide research are explored. Although meaningful achievements have been amassed through continuous interest and efforts of the academic community, two limitations are raised; the gap between pure research and policy research that hinders the working of synthetic imagination, and the intellectual lag falling behind a rapidly changing society. In addition, it is suggested that the operation, curation, and augmentation gaps would emerge as new agenda for digital divide research in the intelligent information age.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aquili, S. & Moghaddam, A. (2008). "Bridging the Digital Divide: The Role of Librarians and Information Professionals in the Third Millenniem." The Electronic Library, 26(2). 226-237. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640470810864118
  2. Bell, D. (1973). The Coming of Postindustrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. Basic Books.
  3. Bhaskar, M. (2016). Curation: The Power of Selection in a World of Excess. Hachette.
  4. Bostrom, N. (2017). Superintelligence. Dunod.
  5. Brynjolfsson, E. & McAfee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. WW Norton & Company.
  6. Burawoy, M. (2005). "For Public Sociology." American Sociological Review. 70(1). 4-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240507000102
  7. Carr. D. (2007). "The Global Digital Divide." Contexts. 6(3), 58. https://doi.org/10.1525/ctx.2007.6.3.58
  8. Chung, C. (2012). The Theory of Electronic Government. Seoul Economy Management.
  9. Correa, T. (2008). "Literature Review: Understanding the 'Second-Level Digital Divide'." An Unpublished Manuscript Prepared for the Class Mass Communication Theory I, School of Journalism, UT-Austin.
  10. Council of Economic Advisors (2015). "Mapping the Digital Divide." Issue Brief, July 2015. 1-10.
  11. DeHaan, J. (2004). "A Multifaceted Dynamic Model of the Digital Divide." IT&Society, 1(7). 66-88.
  12. DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Neuman, W. R. & Robinson, J. P. (2001). "Social Implications of the Internet." Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 307-336. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.307
  13. Evers, H. (2002). Knowledge Society and Knowledge Gap. Paper presented at an International Conference, "Globalisation, Culture and Inequalities." in honour of the work of the late Professor Ishak Shari. August 19-21. University Kebansaan Malaysia.
  14. Hanna, K. T. (2021). "Digital Divide." http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/0,,sid9_gci214062,00.html. (Retrieved on October 30).
  15. Harari, Y. N. (2018). 21 Lessons for the 21st Century. Random House.
  16. Hoffman, D. L., T. B. Novak & Schlosser, A. E. (2000). "The Evolution of the Digital Divide: How Gaps in Internet Access May Impact Electronic Commerce." Journal of Computer Mediated Communication (Online). 5(3). http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol5/issue3/hoffman.html.(Retrieved on October 2).
  17. James, J. (2005). "The Global Digital Divide in the Internet: Developed Countries Constructs and Third World Realities." Journal of Information Science. 31(2). 114-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551505050788
  18. Jang, C. & Sung, W. (2020). "The Effect of Digital Divide on the Use of Online Services in the Severely Disabled People: Focusing on Online Accessibility." Informatization Policy, 27(3). 56-81. https://doi.org/10.22693/NIAIP.2020.27.3.056
  19. Jeon, S. (1993). Theory of Information Society: Communication Revolution and New Media. Nanam.
  20. Kim, G. (2014). "An Analysis on the Level Changes of Global Digital Divide using Latent Growth Modeling: Focusing on OECD Countries." Korean Journal of Policy Analysis and Evaluation, 24(2), 47-72. https://doi.org/10.23036/KAPAE.2014.24.2.003
  21. Kim, M. (2013). The Coming of Convergence Civilization: From the Age of Analysis to the Age of Synthesis. Nanam.
  22. Kim, M. (2019). Coevolution of Technology and Society: The Path and Prospect of the Information Society. National Information Society Agency.
  23. Kim, M. (2020). "Digital Divide in the Age of Artificial Intelligence." Korean Regional Sociology, 21(1), 59-88. https://doi.org/10.35175/KRS.2020.21.1.59
  24. Kim, M. & Kim, J. (2001). "Digital Divide: Conceptual Discussions and Prospect, In W. Kim, T. Wang Ling, Y.j. Lee & S. S. Park (eds.). The Human Society and the Internet: Internet-related Socio-economic Issues. The Proceedings of the First International Conference, Seoul, Korea: Springer.
  25. Kim, M. & Kim, J. (2002). "Digital Divide: Conceptual and Practical Implications." Korean Sociology, 36(4), 123-155.
  26. Kim, N. & Kim, M. (2013). "Body in a High-Tech Age: Corporeal Consequences of Technological Convergence." Journal of Social Thoughts and Culture, 28, 233-265. https://doi.org/10.17207/jstc.2013.11.28.233
  27. Kim, R. (2011). "'App Gap' Emerges Highlighting Savvy Mobile Children." GIGAOM: Voices in Innovation. Oct 25, 2011. Blog Post.
  28. Korea Agency for Digital Opportunity and Promotion (2007). 2007 Digital Divide Index and Survey. Korea Agency for Digital Opportunity and Promotion.
  29. Korea Agency for Digital Opportunity and Promotion (2008). 2008 Digital Divide Index and Survey. Korea Agency for Digital Opportunity and Promotion.
  30. Korea Agency for Digital Opportunity and Promotion (2009). Digital Opportunity & Culture White Paper. Korea Agency for Digital Opportunity and Promotion.
  31. Korea Agency for Digital Opportunity and Promotion (2010). 2009 Digital Culture Index and Survey. Korea Agency for Digital Opportunity and Promotion.
  32. National Information Society Agency(Korea Agency for Digital Opportunity and Promotion) (2015). 2015 The Report on the Digital Divide. National Information Society Agency(Korea Agency for Digital Opportunity and Promotion).
  33. Kurzweil, R. (2005). The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. Penguin.
  34. Lee, H. (2019). Intelligent Information Society User Awareness Survey Results and Policy Implications. Paper presented at the 2018 Cyber Communication Society Fall Conference.
  35. Li, Robin (2017). Artificial Intelligence Revolution: How AI Will Change our Society, Economy, and Culture. Zhong xin chu ban she.
  36. Lu, M. (2001). "Digital Divide in Developing Countries." Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 4(3),1-4. https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2001.10856304
  37. Mills, C. W. (1959). The Sociological Imagination. Oxford University Press.
  38. Min, Y. (2011). "The Digital Divide among Internet Users: An Analysis of Digital Access, Literacy, and Participation." Journal of Communication Research, 48(1), 150-187. https://doi.org/10.22174/jcr.2011.48.1.150
  39. Moravec, H. (1990). Mind Children: der Wettlauf zwischen menschlicher und kunstlicher Intelligenz. Hoffmann u. Campe.
  40. Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. & Michele, G. (2006). "Race, Place, and Information Technology (IT)." Urban Affairs Review, 41(5), 583-620. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087405283511
  41. National Information Society Agency (2015). 2015 Digital Culture Index and Survey. National Information Society Agency.
  42. Nemer, D. (2015). "From Digital Divide to Digital Inclusion and Beyond: A Positional Review." The Journal of Community Informatics 11(1). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291335826_From_Digital_Divide_to_Digital_Inclusion_and_Beyond.(Retrieved on October 30, 2021).
  43. Oh, C. (2009). "Evaluation Research on Informatization: An Empirical Review." Informatization Policy, 16(4), 3-26.
  44. Opp. R. (2021). "The Evolving Digital Divide." https://www.undp.org/blog/evolving-digitaldivide.(Retrieved on July 14).
  45. Park, H. (1995). The Mechanism of Social Inequality in the Information Society. Paper presented at Asan Foundation's 7th Social Ethics Symposium. October 27.
  46. Rosenbaum, S. (2011). Curation Nation: How to Win in a World Where Consumers Are Creators. McGraw Hill Professional.
  47. Russell, S. & Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Pearson Education Limited.
  48. Ryu, S. (2000). Cyber Communication Theory. Nokdu.
  49. Sasaki, T. (2011). The Age of Curation. Chikuma Shinsyo.
  50. Schradie, J. (2011). "The Digital Production Gap: The Digital Divide and Web 2.0 Collide." Poetics, 39(2), 145-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2011.02.003
  51. Schiller, H. (1996). Information Inequality: The Deeping Social Crisis in America. New York: Routledge.
  52. Seo, H. & Myeong, S. (2016). "Research Trends and Issues on Digital Divide: Focusing on Korean Journals." Journal of Korean Association For Regional Information Society, 19(2), 151-187.
  53. Seo, U. & Lee, H. (2006). "The Effect of Cultural Taste on Information Inequality." Informatization Policy, 13(3), 197-218.
  54. Tegmark, M. (2017). Life 3.0: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Knopf.
  55. Thomas, R. (1995). "Access and Inequality." in Heap, N. & Thomas, R. (eds.). Information Technology and Society. Sage.
  56. Tichenor, P. J., Olien, C. & Donohue, C. N. (1970). "Mass Media Flow and Differential Growth in Knowledge." Public Opinion Quarterly. 34. 197-209.
  57. U. S. Department of Commerce (1995). Falling Through the Net: A Survey of the 'Have Nots' in Rural and Urban America. https://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fallingthru.html. (Retrieved on October 30, 2021).
  58. U. S. Department of Commerce (1998). Falling Through the Net II: New Data on the Digital Divide. https://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/net2.(Retrived on October 30, 2021).
  59. U. S. Department of Commerce (1999). Falling Through the Net III: Defining the Digital Divide. http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/digitaldivide.(Retrieved on October 30, 2021).
  60. U. S. Department of Commerce (2000). Falling Through the Net III: Toward Digital Inclusion. http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/digitaldivide.(Retrieved on October 30, 2021).
  61. Vogels, E. (2021). "Digital Divide Persists Even as Americans with Lower Incomes Make Gains in Tech Adoption." Pew Research Center . (Retrieved on October 27).
  62. Wallace, W. (2017[1971]). The Logic of Science in Sociology. Routledge.
  63. Wikipedia (2021). "Digital Divide." Footnote [35]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_divide. (Retrieved on November 7).
  64. Yang, S., Song, H. & Cho, K. (2002). "Information Democracy and Information Welfare Policy in the Knowledge-based Society: A Solution for the Digital Divide." Korean Social Science, 24(1), 79-112.
  65. Yoon, H., Shin, H. & Kim, Y. (2020). "A Study on the Relationship between Level of Digital Information Usage and Life Satisfaction: The Mediating Effect of the Social Capital." Informatization Policy, 27(4), 85-100. https://doi.org/10.22693/NIAIP.2020.27.4.085
  66. Yung, C. (2017). "From Digital Divide to Facebook Divide, Reconstruct our Target Market Segments with Facebook Native and Facebook Immigrant." Jaipuria International Journal of Management Research, 3(1), 8-18. https://doi.org/10.22552/jijmr/2017/v3/i1/146083