International Journal of Industrial Entomology and Biomaterials

Korean Society of Sericultural Science (한국잠사학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Modifications of heterobeltiosis, heterosis, and hybrid vigour over check parent formulae to enhance judgment on hybrids

  • Ghazy, Usama M. (Sericulture Research Department, Plant Protection Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center) ;
  • Fouad, Tahia A. (Sericulture Research Department, Plant Protection Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center)
  • Received : 2021.03.11
  • Accepted : 2021.06.24
  • Published : 2021.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Many researchers are using the heterosis, heterobeltiosis and hybrid vigour over check parent value formulae to determine the hybrid vigour for animals, plants and silkworm breeding. These formulae are ideal for determine the hybrid vigour for the positive direction of single trait. It is difficult using these formulae for multiple traits. Suggested modification for cardinal formulae were made as well as suggestion new formula for determines hybrid vigour for multiple traits. Modifications of hybrid vigour were made to facilitate judgment of best hybrids under study for multiple traits. Nineteen local hybrids of mulberry silkworm were prepared for these investigations in addition the imported Bulgarian hybrid. Comparison between the cardinal and the modifications formulae were applied for thirteen economic characters. Nine positive and four negative direction characters were observed. Modified formulae make the judgment of heterobeltiosis, heterosis and hybrid vigour over check parent value very facilitate for positive and negative traits.

Keywords

References

  1. Abro S, Laghari S, Deho ZA, Manjh MA (2014) To estimates heterosis and heterobeltosis of yield and quality traits in upland cotton. Journal of Biology Agriculture and Healthy Care 4 (6) ,19-22.
  2. Adhikari A, Ibrahim AM, Rudd JC, Baenziger PS, Sarazin JB (2020). Estimation of heterosis and combining abilities of US winter wheat germplasm for hybrid development in Texas. Crop Science 60, 788-803. https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20020
  3. Acquaah G. (2019) Principles of Plant Genetics and Breeding. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  4. Ayano A, Alamirew S, Tesfaye A (2015) Heterosis and combining ability of fruit and bean characters in Ethiopian origin coffee (Coffea arabica L.) hybrids. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare 5 (11), 203-213.
  5. Bernardes JP, Stelkens RB, Greig D (2017) Heterosis in hybrids within and between yeast species. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 30, 538-548. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13023
  6. Dunham R, Masser M (2012) Production of hybrid catfish. Southern Regional Aquaculture Center 190, 1-7.
  7. Gadag RN, Upadhyaya HD (1995) Heterosis in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill). Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 55 (3), 308-314.
  8. Getahun D, Alemneh T, Akeberegn D, Getabalew M, Zewdie D (2019) Importance of hybrid vigor or heterosis for animal breeding. Biochemistry and Biotechnology Research 7 (1), 1-4.
  9. Ghazy UMM (1999) Isolation and evaluation of pure lines of mulberry silkworm, Bombyx mori L. M. Sc., Economic Entomology (Sericulture), Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University.
  10. Ghazy UMM (2005) Hybridization of some local entries of mulberry silkworm, Bombyx mori L. Ph.D., Economic Entomology (Sericulture), Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University.
  11. Ghazy UMM, Fouda MM (2006) Evaluation of four local simple hybrids of silkworm Bombyx mori L. Bulletin Entomology Society Egypt 83, 191-199.
  12. Ghazy UMM (2007) Manifestation of hybrid vigour in different crosses of the silkworm, Bombyx mori L. Proc. 2nd Inter. Conf. Ent. Soc. Egypt I, 175-183.
  13. Ghazy UMM (2008) Rearing first three instars of mulberry silkworm, Bombyx mori L. under Polythene Cover. Bull. Ent. Soc. Egypt 85, 271-279.
  14. Ghazy UMM (2012) Estimation of hybrid vigor of some Egyptian single local hybrids of mulberry silkworm, Bombyx mori L. International Journal of Industrial Entomology 25 (2), 147 - 151. https://doi.org/10.7852/ijie.2012.25.2.147
  15. Hallauer AR, Eberhard SA (1966) Evaluation of synthetic varieties of maize for yield. Crop Sci. 6,423-427. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600050009x
  16. Hallauer AR, Miranda JB (1988) Quantitative genetics in maize breeding. 2nd ed. Iowa State Univ. Press. Ames, IA.
  17. Hanot P, Herrel A, Guintard C, Cornette R (2019) Unravelling the hybrid vigor in domestic equids: the effect of hybridization on bone shape variation and covariation. BMC Evolutionary Biology 19 (188), 1 - 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-018-1333-8
  18. Hayes HK, Immer FR, Smith DC (1955) Methods of Plant Breeding. Mc graw Hill Book Company, New York 551.
  19. Kanfany G, Fofana A, Tongoona P, Danquah A, Offei S, Danquah E, Cisse N (2018) Estimates of combining ability and heterosis for yield and its related traits in pearl millet inbred lines under downy mildew prevalent areas of Senegal. International Journal of Agronomy, 1-12.
  20. Kawamura K, Kawanabe T, Shimizu M, Nagano A, Saeki N, Okazaki K, Kaji M, Dennis E, Osabe K, Fujimoto R (2016) Genetic distance of inbred lines of Chinese cabbage and its relationship to heterosis. Plant Gene., 5, 1 -7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plgene.2015.10.003
  21. Kumar N, Paul S, Chaudhary HK, Sood VK, Mishra SK, Singh AD, Devi R (2016 a) Combining ability, gene action and heterosis for seed yield and its attributes in linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.). SABRAO Journal of Breeding & Genetics 48 (4), 434-444.
  22. Kumar P, Singh N, Singh PK (2016 b) A study on heterosis in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) for yield and its component traits. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 6 (7), 1318-1325. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.607.158
  23. Kumar GV, Vanaja M, Babu A, Premkumar Jyothi LN, Sarkar B (2017) Heterosis and combining ability studies in blackgram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) under alfisols of SAT region, India. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 8(2), 541-547. https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-928X.2017.00081.3
  24. Liu X, Liang H, Li Z, Liang Y, Lu C, Li C, Chang Y, Zou G, Hu G (2017) Performances of the hybrid between Cyca nucleocytplasmic hybrid fish and scattered mirror carp in different culture environments. Scientific Reports 7 (46329), 1 - 25. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-016-0028-x
  25. Parameshwarappa SG, Salimath PM, Upadhyaya HD, Kajjidoni ST, Patil SS (2012) Heterosis in relation to genetic divergence in minicore collections of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 72 (3), 303-308.
  26. Proops L, Burden F, Osthaus B (2009) Mule cognition: a case of hybrid vigour? Anim Cogn. 12, 75-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-008-0172-1
  27. Rahman RF, Ali MM, Salam MA, Ara J, Ahsan MK, Haque MT (2015) Heterosis and combining ability analysis among Indigenous and newly developed bivoltine silkworm, Bombyx mori L. Journal of Biological Sciences 15 (2), 92-97 . https://doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2015.92.97
  28. Rajalakshmi E, Chauhan TPS, Kamble CK (1998) Hybrid vigour among newly evolved bivoltine hybrids of silkworm Bombyx mori under hill conditions. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 68 (9), 620-624.
  29. Sajgotra M, Bali RK, Sharma R (2017) Heterosis studies on thermotolerant hybrids of bivoltine silkworm Bombyx mori L. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6 (5), 921-928.
  30. Samayoa LF, Malvar RA, Butron A (2017) QTL for maize mid parent heterosis in the heterotic pattern american Dent × European flint under corn borer pressure. Front Plant Sci. 8 (573), 1-8.
  31. Sekhar L, Prakash BG, Salimath PM, Hiremath CP, Sridevi O, Patil AA (2010) Implications of heterosis and combining ability among productive single cross hybrids in tomato. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 1 (4), 706-711.
  32. Sharma K, Bali K (2019) Analysis of heterosis in some bivoltine silkworm hybrids of Bombyx mori L. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 7 (5), 1- 8.
  33. Talebi E, Subramanya G (2009) Genetic distance and heterosis through evaluation index in the silkworm, Bombyx mori L. World Applied Sciences Journal 7(9), 1131-1137.
  34. Talebi E, Subramanya G, Bakkappa S (2010) An investigation on heterosis and inbreeding depression in the silkworm, Bombyx mori L. ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science 5 (3), 52-55.
  35. Tiwari A, Singh DK (2016) Study of heterosis and combining ability for earliness and vegetative traits in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Journal of Applied and Natural Science 8 (2), 999-1005. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v8i2.911
  36. Tyagi V, Dhillon SK, Kaur G, Kaushik P (2020) Heterotic effect of different cytoplasmic combinations in sunflower hybrids cultivated under diverse irrigation regimes. Plants 9 (465), 1-16.
  37. Van Hulten MHA, Paulo MJ, Kruijer W, Vries BDH, Kemperman B, Becker FFM, Yang J, Lauss K, Stam ME, Eeuwijk FAV, Keurentjes JJB (2018) Assessment of heterosis in two Arabidopsis thaliana common-reference mapping populations. Plos One 13(10), 1-25.
  38. Vandana Y, Narendra PS, Anjali K, Rahul S, Aamrapali B, Sourabh S (2018) Effects of crossbreeding in livestock. The Pharma Innovat J. 7 (6), 672-676.
  39. Wakchaure R, Ganguly S, Praveen PK, Sharma S, Kumar A, Mahajan T, Qadri K (2015) Importance of heterosis in animals: A Review. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Innovative Science 1(2), 1-5.