DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Experienced Consumers' Concerns on Willingness to Purchase Battery Electric Vehicles

순수전기차 경험 고객의 우려 요인에 따른 전기차 구매 의사 영향

  • Jeong, Jikhan (School of Economic Sciences, Washington State University)
  • 정직한 (워싱턴 주립대학교 경제학과)
  • Received : 2021.03.17
  • Accepted : 2021.06.20
  • Published : 2021.06.28

Abstract

Research on consumers' perception and willingness to purchase Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs) is necessary to simulate BEVs' deployment in South Korea because South Korea's BEVs market is still in the early stage. This paper derives a theoretical framework for consumer segmentation based on consumers' willingness to purchase before and after BEV usage experience. In particular, this study empirically evaluates consumers' willingness to purchase and concerns using the survey data from BEVs users in either Seoul or the Jeju region. The empirical results from logit models show that experienced consumers' concerns about the heater and air conditioning (HAC) in BEVs decreased the consumers' willingness to buy, while greater daily driving distances increased the consumers' willingness to buy. In addition, the empirical findings from ordered probit models show that experienced consumers' concerns about the short driving distance, the availability of maintenance service (i.e., A/S service) during unexpected events, and the difficulties of driving BEVs up-hill increased the degree of concern about HAC. This paper will provide insights related to consumer segmentation, R&D, marketing strategies, and policy design for policymakers and firms.

국내 순수전기차 시장은 초기 시장형성 단계이므로 보급확대를 위해서는 고객의 순수전기차에 대한 인식과 구매 의사에 관한 연구가 필요하다. 본 논문은 고객세분화를 위한 이론적 프레임을 전기차 사용 경험 전후에 고객의 전기차 구매 의사를 기반으로 도출하였다. 특히 순수전기차 사용 경험이 있는 서울 및 제주지역 응답자만을 대상으로 한 설문조사를 통해 고객의 구매 의사와 우려 요인들을 실증분석하였다. 로지스틱 회귀모델의 분석 결과, 경험 고객이 차내 냉난방기기에 대한 우려가 클수록 고객의 구매 의사는 감소하고, 고객의 전기차의 일일 주행거리가 길수록 구매 의사는 증가한다. 또한 순차형 프로빗 모델의 분석 결과, 경험 고객의 전기차의 주행거리, 사고 시 A/S, 경사로 주행에 대한 우려가 클수록 고객이 냉난방기기에 대해 우려가 증가했다. 본 논문은 정책입안자 및 기업에게 전기차 관련 고객세분화, 연구개발, 마케팅 전략, 지원정책 수립과 관련하여 시사점을 제공할 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Korea Energy Agency (2013). EV demonstration project data analysis and EV distribution. internal paper. (2013). Ulasn : KEA.
  2. F. Buhler, P. Cocron, I. Neumann, T. Franke. & J. F. Krems. (2014). Is EV Experience Related to EV Acceptance? Results from a German Field Study. Transportation Research Part F: traffic psychology and behaviour. 25, 34-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.05.002
  3. W. Li, R. Long, H. Chen & J. Geng. (2017). A Review of Factors Influencing Consumer Intentions to Adopt Battery Electric Vehicles. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 78, 318-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.076
  4. P. Plotz, U. Schneider, J. Globisch & E. Dutschke. (2014). Who Will Buy Electric Vehicles? Identifying Early Adopters in Germany. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 67, 96-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.06.006
  5. S. M. Shim, H. M. Kim & S. H. Son. (2020). The Impact of Perceived Economic Value and Personal Characteristics on Electric Vehicle Purchase Intention - For residents of Jeju As a Special District for Electric Vehicles. Journal of Digital Convergence, 18(2), 163-174. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2020.18.2.163
  6. Y. K. Heung. (2019). A Comparative Study Between Korea And Japan on Low-Carborn Vehicles Selection Attributes and Purchase Dates According to Consumer Characteristics. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(12), 159-170 DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2019.17.12.159
  7. D. Kim, J. Ko. & Y. Park. (2015). Factors affecting Electric Vehicle Sharing Program Participants' Attitudes about Car Ownership and Program Participation. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 36, 96-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.02.009
  8. O. Egbue & S. Long. (2012). Barriers to Widespread Adoption of Electric Vehicles: An Analysis of Consumer Attitudes and Perceptions. Energy policy, 48, 717-729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.009
  9. Y. K. Heung. (2017). A Study on the Influence of Consumer Type on Consumer Intention to Purchase Eco-friendly Vehicles in the Service Management of Convergence Industry. Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(10), 221-232 DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2017.15.10.221
  10. B. Lin & W. Wu. (2018). Why People Want to Buy Electric Vehicle: An Empirical Study in First-tier Cities of China. Energy Policy, 112, 233-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.026
  11. A. F. Jensen, E. Cherchi & S. L. Mabit. (2013). On the Stability of Preferences and Attitudes Before and After Experiencing an Electric Vehicle. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 25, 24-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2013.07.006
  12. F. Schmalfuss, K. Muhl & J. F. Krems. (2017). Direct Experience with Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs) Matters When Evaluating Vehicle Attributes, Attitude and Purchase Intention. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 46, 47-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.01.004
  13. M. K. Hidrue, G. R. Parsons, W. Kempton, & M. P. Gardner. (2011). Willingness to Pay for Electric Vehicles and Their Attributes. Resource and Energy Economics, 33(3), 686-705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2011.02.002
  14. Q. Q. Chen & H. J. Park. (2017). A Comparison of Influencing Factors on Usage Intention between Shared Cars and Environment-friendly Cars-Focusing on Chinese Consumers. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(11), 211-219. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2018.16.11.211
  15. E. Kim & E. Heo. (2019). Key Drivers Behind the Adoption of Electric Vehicle in Korea: An Analysis of the Revealed Preferences. Sustainability, 11(23), 6854. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236854
  16. C. S. Moon & H. S. Yang. (2014). A Study on the Impact of Satisfaction Level with Automobile Service Quality on Word-of-mouth Intention. Journal of Digital Convergence, 12(12), 151-160. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2014.12.12.151
  17. Y. K. Heung. (2018). A Study on the Moderating Effect of Government Support Policy between Eco- Friendly Vehicles Attributes and Consumer Purchasing Attitudes in Service Management Era. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(12), 257-266 DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2018.16.12.257
  18. J. W. Gu, J. H. Lee, M. S. Chung & J. Y. Lee. (2017). Electric Vehicle Technology Trends Forecast Research Using the Paper and Patent Data. Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(2), 211-219. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2017.15.2.165
  19. E. J. Kim. (2018). A Study on the Acceptability and Preference of Electric Car for Consumers through the Selective Model. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(5), 213-220. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2018.16.5.213
  20. M. C. Kim. (2013). Analysis on Acceptance Intention of Augmented Reality System - Using Logit Model. Journal of Digital Convergence, 11(11), 373-380. UCI : G704-002010.2013.11.11.077 https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2013.11.11.373
  21. K. E. Train. (2009). Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge : Cambridge university press.
  22. K. Train. (1987). A Validation Test of a Disaggregate Mode Choice Model. Transportation Research, 12(3), 167-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-1647(78)90120-X
  23. D. Cho. (2006). Introductory financial econometrics. Seoul : Cheonglam.
  24. W. H. Green. (2012). Econometric analysis, 7th ed, Harlow: Pearson Education.
  25. D. Mallick. (2009). Marginal and Interaction Effects in Ordered Response Models. Economics and Econometrics Research Institute Research Paper Series, 22.
  26. K Degirmenci & M. H. Breitner. (2017). Consumer Purchase Intentions for Electric Vehicles: Is Green More Important than Price and Range?. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 51, 250-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.01.001
  27. D. Y. Han & J. I. Lee. (2016). An Effect of the Eco-friendly Consciousness of the Undergraduate by the Lifestyle on the Purchase Intention of the Eco-friendly Products. Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(7), 83-91. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2016.14.7.83
  28. F. J. Costello & K. C. LEE. (2020). Exploring the Sentiment Analysis of Electric Vehicles Social Media Data by Using Feature Selection Methods. Journal of Digital Convergence, 18(2), 249-259. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2020.18.2.249