DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effects of a 52-hour workweek policy on meat consumption patterns in Korea

  • Cho, Jaesung (Division of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Jeong, Minkook (Department of Environment & Resources Research, Korea Rural Economic Institute) ;
  • Seo, Gangcheol (Department of Agricultural Outlook, Korea Rural Economic Institute) ;
  • Lee, Hyungwoo (Department of Agricultural Outlook, Korea Rural Economic Institute)
  • Received : 2020.11.12
  • Accepted : 2021.01.06
  • Published : 2021.03.01

Abstract

The 52-hour workweek policy in Korea is a system that limits the maximum working hours per week to 52 hours including holiday work, which has been treated separately from overtime work during a week. Although this policy is designed to improve the quality of life and create jobs, it may also reduce the income of some workers. In general, it can be assumed that reduced working hours increase consumption at home. This study analyzed the effect of the 52-hour work policy on meat consumption patterns with the ordered logit model. Major factors considered in this study include working hours, income, and consumption frequency. It distinguished domestic and workplace consumption. The results show that the policy has had an impact on meat consumption patterns both at home and at work. If there is no change in income and only the working hours decrease, meat consumption in households increases. On the other hand, if both income and working hours decrease, household meat consumption decreases. Moreover, reduced working hours decrease the frequency of office happy hour and meat consumption in the workplace. However, the 52-hour workweek policy applies only to workers working more than 52 hours per week; thus, it is difficult to determine the overall effect of the policy on national meat consumption patterns.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 한국농촌경제연구원(KREI)의 지원으로 수행되었습니다(육류 소비행태 변화와 대응 과제).

References

  1. Cameron AC, Trivedi PK. 2017. Microeconometrics using stata revised edition. pp. 696-697. Jiphill Media, Texas, USA.
  2. Choi SM. 2020. Analysis of participation and satisfaction with leisure according to whether or not a 52-hour workweek policy is enforced: Based on 2019 national leisure activity survey. Journal of Tourism and Leisure Research 32:389-406. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.31336/jtlr.2020.4.32.4.389
  3. Hong S, Lee K, Kim S. 2020. Analysis of consumers' perception on the safety and quality of food from rural convergence industry. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 47:95-104. [in Korean]
  4. KCTI (Korea Culture & Tourism Institute). 2019. Impact and challenges of reducing working hours on the tourism market. KCTI, Seoul, Korea. [in Korean]
  5. Kim ST. 2019. Effects of work time reduction and application of the 52-hour cap policy. Monthly Labor Review 177:39-54. [in Korean]
  6. KLSI (Korea Labour & Society Institute). 2018. Socio-economic effects of a 52-hour workweek policy. KLSI, Sejong, Korea. [in Korean]
  7. Lim KT, Park J. 2017. Consumers' awareness and behavior intention on meat consumption according to climate change. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 44:296-307. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20170029
  8. PTI (Pi-Touch Institute). 2019. Economic effects of a 52-hour workweek policy. PTI, Seoul, Korea. [in Korean]
  9. SI (The Seoul Institute). 2019. Second quarter Seoul consumer sentiment and 52-hour workweek policy. SI, Seoul, Korea. [in Korean]
  10. Yoo J, Kim S, Yoo J. 2018. Factors affecting consumers' preferences for US beef. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 45:905-916. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.7744/KJOAS.20180092