Korean Journal of Agricultural Science (농업과학연구)

Institute of Agricultural Science, CNU (충남대학교 농업과학연구소)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of sodium stearoyl-2-lactylate emulsifier on growth performance and nutrient digestibility of growing pig

  • Hoque, Md Raihanul (Department of Animal Resource & Science, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, In Ho (Department of Animal Resource & Science, Dankook University)
  • Received : 2020.10.26
  • Accepted : 2021.01.06
  • Published : 2021.03.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study investigated the influence of sodium stearoyl-2-lactylate (SSL) emulsifier on the growth performance and nutrient digestibility of growing pigs. For this 56-day long-duration experiment, 80 heads of cross-bred ([Landrace × Yorkshire] × Duroc) pigs with an initial body weight of 23.80 ± 4.87 kg were divided into two (2) treatment groups each fed a different diet: with and without an emulsifier. Each treatment group had 8 replication pens with 5 pigs per pen. Feed treatments were as follows: 1) CON: Basal diet, and 2) SSL: CON + 0.05% SSL. Body weight (BW), average daily gain (ADG), and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were measured for three periods: 0 - 4, 5 - 8, and 0 - 8 weeks. The nutrient digestibility parameters consisting of dry matter (DM) digestibility and nitrogen (N) digestibility were calculated on the 4th and 8th week. Based on the results, the SSL supplementation did not show any significant influence on the growth performance parameters during the 0 to 4 and 5 to 8 week phases. For the overall performance, only the FCR (p = 0.048) was significantly different in the emulsifier fed group (SSL) compared to the CON group (T1). DM and N digestibility was also not influenced by the SSL addition in the growing pig diet. Overall, the SSL supplementation showed a limited effect on the growth performance of growing pigs.

Keywords

References

  1. Ali SF, Chao W, Xiaoli W, Jintian H, Mingfa W, Abd El-Hack ME, Lili Z, Xiang Z, Tian W. 2017. Growth, serum biochemical indices, antioxidant status and meat quality of broiler chickens fed diet supplemented with sodium stearoyl-2 lactylate. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 37:445-449.
  2. AOAC (Association of Office Analytical Chemists). 2005. Official method of analysis, 16th edition. AOAC, Washington, D.C., USA.
  3. Bai G, He W, Yang Z, Fu H, Qiu S, Gao F, Shi B. 2019. Effects of different emulsifiers on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and digestive enzyme activity in weanling pigs. Journal of Animal Science 97:4235-4241. doi:10.1093/jas/skz276
  4. Gheiser MM, Hosseindoust A, Kim HB, Kim IH. 2015. Effects of lysolecithin and sodium stearoyl-2-lactylate on growth performance and nutrient digestibility in broilers. Korean Journal of Poultry Science 42:133-137. doi:10.5536/KJPS.2015.42.2.133
  5. Jones DB, Hancock JD, Harmon DL, Walker CE. 1992. Effects of exogenous emulsifiers and fat sources on nutrient digestibility, serum lipids, and growth performance in weanling pigs. Journal of Animal Science 70:3473-3482. https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.70113473x
  6. Krogdahl A. 1985. Digestion and absorption of lipids in poultry. Journal of Nutrition 115:675-685. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/115.5.675
  7. Li TS, Liu WC, Zhao PY, Kim IH. 2017. Evaluation of essential oil or/and emulsifier in low energy density diets on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood cholesterol and meat quality in finishing pigs. Italian Journal of Animal Science 16:624-630. doi:10.1080/1828051X.2017.1325718
  8. Liu X, Yun KS, Kim IH. 2020. Evaluation of sodium stearoyl-2-lactylate and 1, 3-diacylglycerol blend supplementation in diets with different energy content on the growth performance, meat quality, apparent total tract digestibility, and blood lipid profiles of broiler chickens. Journal of Poultry Science 50:55-62. doi:10.2141/jpsa.0190007
  9. NRC (National Research Council). 2012. Nutrient requirements of swine, 11th Ed. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
  10. Santos KM, Watanabe PH, Freitas ER, Nepomuceno RC, Oliviera PJD, Lima VM, Rodrigues BBV, Do Nascimento GAJ, De Carvalho LE. 2017. Beef tallow and emulsifier in growing-finishing pig diets. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias 89:1221-1230. doi:10.1590/0001-3765201720160500
  11. Sun HY, Yoon YB, Kim IH. 2019. Growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood lipid profile and faecal Escherichia coli and Lactobacillus counts on growing pigs fed with de-oiled lecithin emulsifier. Italian Journal of Animal Science 18:1111-1116. doi: 10.1080/1828051X.2019.1620140
  12. Williams CH, David DJ, Iismaa O. 1962. The determination of chromic oxide in faeces samples by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Journal of Agricultural Science 59:381-385. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185960001546X
  13. Yin J, Jiao Y, Kim YM, Kim IH. 2019. Effects of reducing dietary energy (tallow) in diets containing emulsifier blend on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and blood profile in growing pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 99:206-209. doi:10.1139/cjas-2017-0155
  14. Yin J, Yun HM, Kim IH. 2018. Effects of supplemental glycerol polyethylene glycol ricinoleate in different energy density diets on the growth performance, blood profiles, nutrient utilization, and excreta gas emission of broilers: Focus on dietary glycerol polyethylene glycol ricinoleate in broilers. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 45:219-228. https://doi.org/10.7744/KJOAS.20180006
  15. Yun HM, Yun KS, Upadhaya SD, Kim IH. 2019. Effect of supplementation of sodium stearoyl-2-lactylate as fat emulsifier in low-density diet on growth performance, backfat thickness, lean muscle percentage, and meat quality in finishing pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 99:132-137. doi:10.1139/cjas-2017-0206
  16. Zhao PY, Li HL, Hossain MM, Kim IH. 2015. Effect of emulsifier (lysophospholipids) on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and blood profile in weanling pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 207:190-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.06.007