한국융합학회논문지 (Journal of the Korea Convergence Society)

  • 제12권4호
  • /
  • Pages.259-266
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2233-4890(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6353(eISSN)
한국융합학회 (Korea Convergence Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

프로세스모델링을 활용한 사회적기업 R&D지원정책의 논리모형

A Study on the Logical Model of R&D Support Policy for Social Enterprise

  • 경종수 (선문대학교 행정.공기업학과) ;
  • 이보형 (중소기업기술정보진흥원)
  • Kyung, Jong-soo (Division of Public Administration and Enterprise, Sunmoon University) ;
  • Lee, Bo-hyung (TIPA(Korea Technology and Information Promotion Agency))
  • 투고 : 2021.03.19
  • 심사 : 2021.04.20
  • 발행 : 2021.04.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 사회적기업의 경쟁력을 강화하는 방안으로 R&D활동 체계화와 지원정책의 논리모형을 제공하는 것이 목적이다. 사회적기업의 R&D수요조사 및 심층면접(FGI)을 토대로 R&D활동을 체계화하여 R&D정책의 논리모형을 도출하고자 한다. 사회적기업의 R&D활동은 일반기업과 비교해 초기단계이거나 체계성이 매우 미흡하다. 프로세스모델링 방법은 사회적기업의 R&D활동 세부요소를 표준화하는 방법으로 R&D지원정책의 논리성 확보에 활용될 수 있다. 연구결과 사회적기업들은 사회가치 증진을 위한 제품과 서비스의 경쟁력확보를 위해 R&D활동의 필요성과 중요성을 인식하고 있으며, R&D경험 및 역량이 부족하기 때문에 R&D전문기관(R&D기획전문기관, 정부출연 연구기관, 대학 등)과 협력을 통한 R&D역량 개선을 기대하고 있다. 사회적기업 R&D활동의 성과지표는 심층면접(FGI)을 통하여 투입-과정-성과지표 단위로 도출하였고, R&D지원정책의 논리모형은 심층면접자료와 기존연구를 참고하여 사업정의, 주요고객, 비전체계, 사업전략, R&D활동요소, 성공요인 등의 영역으로 구분하여 도출하였다.

This study is a study to systematize the R&D activities of social enterprises to derive a logical model of the R&D support policy, and aims to systematize the R&D activities based on the R&D demand survey and R&D activity analysis of social enterprises. R&D activities of social enterprises are at an early stage or are not systematic compared to general enterprises, so the process modeling method is used to group detailed activity elements to standardize and systemize them. As a result of the research, social enterprises are aware of the necessity and importance of R&D activities to secure competitiveness of products and services to increase social value, and because of their lack of R&D experience and capabilities, R&D specialized institutes (R&D planning institutes, government-funded research institutes), Universities, etc.) and are expected to improve R&D capabilities. The performance indicators of social enterprise R&D activities are derived in units of input-process-performance indicators through demand survey, activity analysis, and in-depth interview (FGI), and the logical model of R&D support policy is in the areas related to business strategy and performance.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. S. K. Park & D. H. Chang (2013). The Analysis on Support System For Social Enterprises in korea, Journal of Social Science, 24(4), 83-104. https://doi.org/10.46415/jss.2017.12.24.4.83
  2. D. H. Lee. (2012). A Study on the Operation System of the Social Enterprise, Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 35(1), 109-138. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0b013e32835108b1
  3. J. S. Kyung. (2020). A Study on the Public Business Model Development of Local Government's Investment Agency: Case of Chungnam Technopark, The Korean Journal of Local Public Enterprises, 16(1), 47-68. https://doi.org/10.24020/kjlpe.2020.16.1.47
  4. M. J. Choi. (2011). A Classification Model of Social Enterprises in Consideration of Competitive Factors, Logos Management Review, 9(1), 147-174.
  5. J. S. Kyung, W. G. Cho & S. J. Yang. (2013). The Study of Business Model Development of Support Service Program for Small and Medium Enterprise Using Process Modeling, The e-Business Studies, 14(4), 99-118. https://doi.org/10.15719/geba.14.4.201310.99
  6. Y. S. Koh, I. S. Chang, C. W. Moon & Y. H. Shin. (2014). A Review of Social Entrepreneurship: Towards a Theory of Process Perspectives, Journal of Strategic Management, 17(2), 155-184. https://doi.org/10.17786/jsm.2014.17.2.007
  7. J. I. Jang. (2019). A Review on the Concept of Social Economy : Focusing on Comparison with the Concept of Non-Profit Sector. Social Enterprise Studies, 12(3), 35-61.
  8. J. Defourny. (2004, October). Social enterprise in an enlarged Europe : concept and realities, MEMS. (pp. 1-21). Krakow.
  9. H. Hansmann. (1996). The Ownership of Enterprise, Cambridge. MA : The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  10. A. Evers & J. L. Laville (Eds.). (2004). The Third Sector in Europe, Cheltenham : Edward Elgar.
  11. A. Thomas. (2004). The rise of social cooperatives in Italy. Voluntas, 15(3), 243-263. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VOLU.0000046280.06580.d8
  12. V. A. Pestoff. (2009). A Democratic Architecture for the Welfare State, Routledge
  13. J. Y. Rha. (2010). Business Model of Social Enterprise, Journal of Entrepreneurship and Venture Studies, 13(4), 136-137.
  14. J. S. Kyung & B. H. Lee. (2010). An Approach to Diffrentiate Business Support Policies for Reinforcement of Small-Medium Enterprises' Competency by Growth Stage, Asia Pacific Journal of Small Business, 32(4), 57-79.
  15. Y. S. Chang & J. M. Kim. (2007). An Empirical Study on High-technology Innovative SMEs' Characteristics and their Bottlenecks across the Growth Stages. IE Interfaces, 20(3), 418-426.
  16. C. M. Kyung & S. C. Kim. (2008). Government Policy for Enhancing the Competitive Power of SMEs : Comparison of Korea and Germany, The Korean Small Business Review, 10(2), 103-123.
  17. S. M. Cho, M. J. Sun, K. H. Lim & C. R. Kang. (2018). How Can We Define Performance of Social Enterprise : A Review, Journal of Korean social welfare administration, 20(2), 81-128. https://doi.org/10.22944/KSWA.2018.20.2.004
  18. S. M. Moon. (2003). Development of Modeling Methodology for Business Process Standardization Using a Reference Model, Conference of The Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society. (pp. 1100-1107).
  19. M. J. Park & T. Y. Kim. (2018). An Analysis of the Role of Social Ventures in Social Innovation, Social Enterprise Studies, 11(3), 3-30.