디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제19권4호
  • /
  • Pages.9-17
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

디지털 저작권침해 행위에서 상황행위이론의 적용을 통한 자기통제와 처벌억제의 조절효과: 다운로드와 업로드 행위의 비교

A Test of Situational Action Theory for Explaining the Moderating Effect of Self-Control and Deterrence in Digital Piracy: Comparing Download with Upload Behavior

  • 이성식 (숭실대학교 정보사회학과) ;
  • 장하영 (숭실대학교 정보사회학과) ;
  • 임수경 (숭실대학교 정보사회학과)
  • Lee, Seong-Sik (Department of Information Sociology, Soongsil University) ;
  • Jang, Ha-Young (Department of Information Sociology, Soongsil University) ;
  • Lim, Su-Kyung (Department of Information Sociology, Soongsil University)
  • 투고 : 2021.01.18
  • 심사 : 2021.04.20
  • 발행 : 2021.04.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구는 상황행위이론을 디지털 저작권침해의 다운로드와 업로드 행위에 적용함에 있어 자기통제력과 처벌억제의 통제작용을 살펴보았다. 상황행위이론에 따르면 개인의 도덕성은 높은데 도덕규칙이 약한 환경일 때는 자기통제력이, 도덕규칙 환경은 높은데 개인의 도덕성이 낮을 때는 처벌억제가 범죄에 통제요인으로 조절효과를 갖는다고 보았다. 이에 본 연구는 서울시 재학중인 317명 대학생을 대상으로 다운로드와 업로드 행위로 나누어 각각 상황행위이론의 논의를 상호작용효과 분석을 통해 검증했다. 분석결과 다운로드의 경우는 도덕성이 높지만 도덕규칙이 낮은 경우에서 자기통제력이, 그리고 도덕규칙이 높지만 도덕성이 낮을 때 처벌억제가 유의미하게 작용할 것이라는 상황행위이론을 지지하지 못했고 상호작용효과 결과가 유의미하지 않았다. 그리고 업로드의 경우는 상황행위이론과는 달리 도덕성은 높지만 도덕규칙이 낮은 경우에서 자기통제력이 업로드를 통제하기보다 오히려 유발하는 요인으로 작용하는 것을 제시했고, 또한 상황행위이론과 반대로 도덕성은 높지만 도덕규칙이 낮은 경우에서 처벌억제가 조절효과를 갖는 것을 제시했다.

This study test a situational action theory for explaining online download and upload digital piracy and examines the moderating effect of self-control and punishment. Then it tests the moderating effect of self-control in high morality and low moral rule environments and tests the moderating effect of perceived punishment in low morality and high moral rule environments. Using data from 317 college students in Seoul, In case of download, results show that self-control does not control the effects of high morality and low moral rule on it. In addition, it is found that perceived punishment does not control the effects of low morality and high moral rule on it. In case of upload, results show that self-control does not control but increase the effects of high morality and low moral rule on it, while perceived punishment controls the effects of high morality and low moral rule on it.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. P. O. Wikstrom. (2010). Explaining Crime as Moral Action. New York : Springer.
  2. O. Antonaccio & C. Tittle. (2008). Morality, Self-Control and Crime. Criminology, 46(2), 479-510. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2008.00116.x
  3. O. Gallupe & S.W. Baron. (2014). Morality, Self-Control, Deterrence, and Drug Use: Street Youths and Situational Action Theory. Crime and Delinquency, 60, 284-305. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128709359661
  4. R. Svensson, L. Pauwels & F. Weerman. (2010). Does the Effect of Self-Control on Adolescent Offending vary by Level of Morality?. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 732-743. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854810366542
  5. H. Hirtenlehner & F. Kunz. (2016). The Interaction between Self-Control and Morality in Crime Causation among Older Adults. European Journal of Criminology, 13, 393-409. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370815623567
  6. R. Meldrum, H. Miller & J. Flexon. (2013). Susceptibility to Peer Influence, Self-Control and Delinquency. Sociological Inquiry, 83, 106-129. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682x.2012.00434.x
  7. H., Hirtenlehner, L. Pauwels & G. Mesko. (2015). Is the Criminogenic Effect of Exposure to Peer Delinquency dependent on the Ability to exercise Self-Control? Results from Three Countries. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43, 532-543. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2015.05.006
  8. L. Pauwels, F. Weerman, G. Bruisma & W. Bernasco. (2011). Perceived Sanction Risk, Individual Propensity and Adolescent Offending. European Journal of Criminology, 8, 386-400. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370811415762
  9. P. O. Wikstrom, H. Tseloni & D. Karlis. (2011). Do People comply by the Law because They fear Getting Caught?. European Journal of Criminology, 8, 401-420. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370811416415
  10. R. Svensson. (2015). An Examination of the Interaction between Morality and Deterrence in Offending: A Research Note. Crime and Delinquency, 61, 3-18. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128713486068
  11. B. F. Skinner & A. M. Fream. (1997). A Social Learning Theory Analysis of Computer Crime among College Students. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34, 495-518. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427897034004005
  12. G. E. Higgins & A. L. Wilson. (2006). Low Self-Control, Moral Beliefs and Social Learning Theory in University Student's Intentions to Pirate Software. Security Journal, 19, 75-92. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.sj.8350002
  13. J. H. Han & H. S. Chang. (2007). The Behavioral Madel of Digital Music Piracy on the Web. The Journal of Information Systems, 16(1), 135-158. DOI :https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001050097
  14. K. H. Kim & T. U. Kim. (2013). Factors That Influence Digital Contents Piracy. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 16(1), 63-71(9pages). DOI : https://scienceon.kisti.re.kr/srch/selectPORSrchArticle.do?cn=JAKO201306737754118 https://doi.org/10.32431/KACE.2013.16.1.007
  15. G. E. Higgins, B. D. Fell & A. L. Wilson. (2006). Digital Piracy: Assessing the Contributions of an Integrated Self-Control Theory and Social Learning Theory using Structural Equation Modeling. Criminal Justice Studies, 19, 3-22. DOI : https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14
  16. I. Brunton-Smith & D. J. McCarthy. (2016). Explaining Young People's Involvement in Online Piracy An Empirical Assessment using the Offending Crime and Justice Survey in England and Wales. Victims and Offenders, 11(4), 509-533. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2015.1121943
  17. S. S. Lee. (2011). The Independent and Interaction Effects of Low Self-Control and Social Learning Variables on Youth's Online Digital Piracy. Korean Journal of Youth Studies, 18(10), 123-142(20 pages). DOI : https://scienceon.kisti.re.kr/srch/selectPORSrchArticle.do?cn=ART001597876
  18. N. Park, Y. Jung & K. M. Lee. (2011). Intention to Upload Video Content on the Internet: The Role of Social Norms and Ego-Involvement. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1996-2004. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.05.006
  19. J. Malin & B. Fowers. (2009). Adolescent Self-Control and Music and Movie Piracy. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 718-722. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.029
  20. S. Hinduja & J. Ingram. (2008). Self-Control and Ethical Beliefs on the Social Learning of Intellectual Property Theft. Western Criminology Review, 9(2), 52-72. DOI : https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-29444455377&partnerID=40&md5=893502b22124ef021dacd1161265a909
  21. G. E. Higgins, A. L. Wilson & B. D. Fell. (2005). An Application of Deterrence Theory to Software Piracy. Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture, 12, 166-184. DOI : https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-29444455377&partnerID=40&md5=893502b22124ef021dacd1161265a909
  22. L. Pauwels. (2018). The Conditional Effects of Self-Control in Situational Action Theory: A Preliminary Test in a Randomized Scenario Study. Deviant Behavior, 39(11), 1450-1466. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2018.1479920
  23. S. S. Lee. (2019). An Application of Extended and Revised Situational Action Theory for Cybercrime. Korean Criminological Review, 30(3), 1-26(26 pages). DOI : https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002514235 https://doi.org/10.36889/kcr.2019.09.30.3.1
  24. H. G. Grasmick, C. R. Tittle & R. J. Bursik. (1993). Testing the Core Empirical Implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi's General Theory of Crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 5-29. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427893030001002