DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Validation of the Korean Version of the Undergraduate Clinical Education Environment Measure

한국형 임상실습 교육환경 평가척도 타당화

  • Chun, Kyunghee (Department of Medical Education, Konyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Young Soon (Department of Medical Education, Konyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Oak, Ji Won (Department of Nursing, Tongmyong University)
  • 천경희 (건양대학교 의과대학 의학교육학교실) ;
  • 박영순 (건양대학교 의과대학 의학교육학교실) ;
  • 옥지원 (동명대학교 간호학과)
  • Received : 2020.12.09
  • Accepted : 2021.02.19
  • Published : 2021.02.28

Abstract

In light of the need for a tool to evaluate the clinical practice education environment as perceived by medical and nursing students, this study is was conducted to develop and validate the Korean version of the Undergraduate Clinical Education Environment Measure (K-UCEEM) as a measurement tool for managing the clinical practice education climate and quality of education. For validation, the UCEEM consisting of 25 items developed by Pia Strand in 2013 was adapted according to standard translation procedures. The K-UCEEM questionnaire was administered to 73 medical students and 135 nursing students who participated in clinical practice at one medical institution. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted to confirm the validity of the instrument's structure. In order to determine referential validity, the relationships among stresses in clinical practice were examined, and differences in factor scores were compared by gender and college. It was confirmed that the scale of 24 items and five factors showed a moderate model fitness index. The reliability of the factors ranged from 0.786 to 0.867. In addition, all five factors were found to have negative correlations with the clinical practice stress sub-factor, and there were statistically significant differences by gender and college. Through this study, the validity and reliability of the K-UCEEM were verified. In the future, it is expected that further verification of the scale, as well as evaluation and improvement of the clinical practice education environment based on this scale, will occur.

Keywords

References

  1. Chun KH, Park WK, Lee SS, Park YS, Kang E. A study on the educational climate, self-directed learning and creative thinking in medical school. Korean J Think Dev. 2010;6(1):179-200.
  2. Irby DM. Improving environment for learning in the health professions. New York (NY): Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation; 2018.
  3. Roff S, McAleer S, Harden RM, Al-Qahtani M, Ahmed AU, Deza H, et al. Development and validation of the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM). Med Teach. 1997;19(4):295-9. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421599709034208
  4. Park KH, Park JH, Kim S, Rhee JA, Kim JH, Ahn YJ, et al. Students' perception of the educational environment of medical schools in Korea: findings from a nationwide survey. Korean J Med Educ. 2015; 27(2):117-30. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2015.27.2.117
  5. Strand P, Sjoborg K, Stalmeijer R, Wichmann-Hansen G, Jakobsson U, Edgren G. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Undergraduate Clinical Education Environment Measure (UCEEM). Med Teach. 2013;35(12):1014-26. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.835389
  6. Stalmeijer RE, Dolmans DH, Wolfhagen IH, Muijtjens AM, Scherpbier AJ. The Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire (MCTQ) as a valid and reliable instrument for the evaluation of clinical teachers. Acad Med. 2010;85(11):1732-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e3181f554d6
  7. Dornan T, Muijtjens A, Graham J, Scherpbier A, Boshuizen H. Manchester Clinical Placement Index (MCPI): conditions for medical students' learning in hospital and community placements. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2012;17(5):703-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-011-9344-x
  8. Ohman E, Alinaghizadeh H, Kaila P, Hult H, Nilsson GH, Salminen H. Adaptation and validation of the instrument Clinical Learning Environment and Supervision for medical students in primary health care. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16(1):308. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0809-8
  9. Abbasi Z, Ahmadi S, Esmaeilpour ZS. Psychometric properties of Undergraduate Clinical Education Environment Measure (UCEEM) in nursing and midwifery students in iran. J Urmia Nurs Midwifery Fac. 2016;14(2):145-50.
  10. Fouad S, El Araby S, Abed RA, Hefny M, Fouad M. Using item response theory (IRT) to assess psychometric properties of Undergraduate Clinical Education Environment Measure (UCEEM) among medical students at the Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University. Educ Med J. 2020;12(1):15-27. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2020.12.1.3
  11. World Health Organization. Process of translation and adaptation of instruments [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018 [cited 2019 Dec 23]. Available from: http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/.
  12. Beck DL, Srivastava R. Perceived level and sources of stress in baccalaureate nursing students. J Nurs Educ. 1991;30(3):127-33. https://doi.org/10.3928/0148-4834-19910301-08
  13. Lee JE, Kim SL. Relationship among stress, coping strategies, and self-esteem in nursing students taking clinical experience. J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Educ. 2005;11(1):98-106.
  14. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, editors. Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park (CA): Sage; 1993.
  15. Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990;107(2):238-46. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
  16. Tucker LR, Lewis C. A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika. 1973;38:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291170
  17. Roberts R, Cleland J, Strand P, Johnston P. Medical students' views of clinical environments. Clin Teach. 2018;15(4):325-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12691
  18. Abasi Z, Ahmadi S, Zanjani SE, Peyman A. Psychometric properties of the Undergraduate Clinical Educational Environment Measure UCEEM in Iranian nursing and midwifery students. Eurasia Proc Educ Soc Sci. 2015;3:38-41.
  19. Kim EY, Yang SH. Effects of clinical learning environment on clinical practice stress and anxiety in nursing students. J Korean Acad Nurs Adm. 2015;21(4):417-25. https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2015.21.4.417
  20. Han JY, Park HS. Effects of teaching effectiveness and clinical learning environment on clinical practice competency in nursing students. J Korean Acad Fundam Nurs. 2011;18(3):365-72.
  21. Jang YM, Park YH. Effects of critical thinking disposition, stress of clinical practice and self-confidence in performance of core nursing skill on nursing student's adapting to clinical practice. J Ind Converg. 2020;18(4):77-86. https://doi.org/10.22678/JIC.2020.18.4.077
  22. Chun YE, Hwang HY. A study on the influence of caring character on satisfaction of clinical practice and self-efficacy of clinical practice in nursing students. Asia Pac J Multimed Serv Converg Art Humanit Sociol. 2020;10(1):43-54.