Korean Medical Education Review (의학교육논단)

Yonsei university college of medicine (연세대학교 의과대학)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Qualitative Study on the Perceptions and Learning Behavior of Medical Students in Online Classes

의과대학 학생의 온라인 수업에 대한 인식 및 학습행동에 관한 질적 연구

  • Kang, Yeji (Department of Medical Education, Hanyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Do-Hwan (Department of Medical Education, Hanyang University College of Medicine)
  • 강예지 (한양대학교 의과대학 의학교육학교실) ;
  • 김도환 (한양대학교 의과대학 의학교육학교실)
  • Received : 2020.12.11
  • Accepted : 2021.02.18
  • Published : 2021.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Since the emergence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), medical schools have experienced a sudden, full-scale transition to online classes. As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, it is important to evaluate current educational programs and to assess their implications. This study explored perceptions of online classes and learning behavior among medical students. Twenty preclinical medical students were interviewed in focus groups for 2 months. They generally expressed positive perceptions about online classes, and in particular, positively assessed the ability to lead their individual lifestyles and study in comfortable environments with fewer time and space constraints. Students thought that the online environment provided a fair chance of facilitating positive interactions with the professor and considered communication with the professor to be an important factor only when it was related to the class content or directly helped with their grades and careers. Students also had negative views, such as feeling uncertain when they could not see their peers' learning progress and assess themselves in comparison and feeling social isolation. Learning behaviors have also changed, as students explored their learning styles and adapted to the changed learning environment. Students expanded their learning by using online functions. However, students sometimes abused the online class format by "just playing" the lecture while not paying attention and relying on other students' lecture transcripts to study. The results of this study are hoped to provide a useful foundation for future research on online class-based teaching and learning.

Keywords

References

  1. Clark RC, Mayer RE. E-learning and the science of instruction: proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. 4th ed. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2016.
  2. Parscal T, Riemer D. Assuring quality in large-scale online course development. Online J Distance Learn Adm. 2010;13(2).
  3. Shachar M, Neumann Y. Differences between traditional and distance education academic performances: a meta-analytic approach. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn. 2003;4(2):1-20.
  4. Johnson MT. Impact of online learning modules on medical student microbiology examination scores. J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2008;9(1):25-9. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v9.91
  5. Lee A. Edutech teaching method for non-face-to-face medical education: focusing on flipped learning. Korean Med Educ Rev. 2020;22(3):217-9. https://doi.org/10.17496/KMER.2020.22.3.217
  6. Davies RS, Dean DL, Ball N. Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educ Technol Res Dev. 2013;61(4):563-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9305-6
  7. O'Doherty D, Dromey M, Lougheed J, Hannigan A, Last J, McGrath D. Barriers and solutions to online learning in medical education: an integrative review. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):130. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1240-0
  8. Han H, Nelson E, Wetter N. Medical students' online learning technology needs. Clin Teach. 2014;11(1):15-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12092
  9. Pei L, Wu H. Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education?: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Educ Online. 2019;24(1):1666538. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2019.1666538
  10. Gordon M, Patricio M, Horne L, Muston A, Alston SR, Pammi M, et al. Developments in medical education in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid BEME systematic review: BEME guide no. 63. Med Teach. 2020;42(11):1202-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1807484
  11. Ragin CC. The comparative method: moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies, with a new introduction. Oakland (CA): University of California Press; 2014.
  12. Stake RE. The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 1995.
  13. Patton MQ. Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: a personal, experiential perspective. Qual Soc Work. 2002;1(3):261-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325002001003636
  14. Tongco MD. Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobot Res Appl. 2007;5:147-58. https://doi.org/10.17348/era.5.0.147-158
  15. Creswell JW, Baez JC. 30 Essential skills for the qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2020.
  16. Morgan DL. Focus groups as qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage publications; 1997.
  17. Seidman I. Interviewing as qualitative research: a guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York (NY): Teachers College Press; 2006.
  18. Flick U. Triangulation in qualitative research. In: Flick U, von Kardorff E, Steinke I, editors. A companion to qualitative research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage publications; 2004. p. 178-83.
  19. Srinivasan DK. Medical students' perceptions and an anatomy teacher's personal experience using an e-learning platform for tutorials during the COVID-19 crisis. Anat Sci Educ. 2020;13(3):318-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1970
  20. Mukhtar K, Javed K, Arooj M, Sethi A. Advantages, limitations and recommendations for online learning during COVID-19 pandemic era. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(COVID19-S4):S27-S31.
  21. Heeter C. Being there: the subjective experience of presence. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ. 1992;1(2):262-71. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1992.1.2.262
  22. Joo YJ, Lim KY, Kim EK. Online university students' satisfaction and persistence: examining perceived level of presence, usefulness and ease of use as predictors in a structural model. Comput Educ. 2011;57(2): 1654-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.008
  23. Kessler R. The teaching presence. Holist Educ Rev. 1991;4(4):4-15.
  24. Garrison DR, Anderson T, Archer W. Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. Am J Distance Educ. 2001;15(1):7-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071
  25. Zimitat C. First year students' perceptions of the importance of good teaching: not all things are equal. Res Dev High Educ. 2006;29:386-92.
  26. Derouin RE, Fritzsche BA, Salas E. E-learning in organizations. J Manag. 2005;31(6):920-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279815
  27. Corno L, Mandinach EB. The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educ Psychol. 1983;18(2):88-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461528309529266
  28. Burns DD. The perfectionist's script for self-defeat. Psychol Today. 2001;14(11):34-51.
  29. Saddler CD, Sacks LA. Multidimensional perfectionism and academic procrastination: relationships with depression in university students. Psychol Rep. 1993;73(3 Pt 1):863-71. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1993.73.3.863
  30. Kidd TT, Song H. A case study of the adult learner's perception of instructional quality in web-based online courses. In: Inoue Y, editor. Online education for lifelong learning. Hershey (PA): IGI Global; 2007. p. 271-91.
  31. Kaye C, Volkers E. Constructivism online: Vygotskian applications for 21st century learning in higher education. In: Inoue Y, editor. Online education for lifelong learning. Hershey (PA): IGI Global; 2007. p. 99-121.
  32. Sandars J, Cleary TJ. Self-regulation theory: applications to medical education: AMEE guide no. 58. Med Teach. 2011;33(11):875-86. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.595434
  33. Kebaetse MB, Kebaetse M, Mokone GG, Nkomazana O, Mogodi M, Wright J, et al. Learning support interventions for Year 1 medical students: a review of the literature. Med Educ. 2018;52(3):263-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13465
  34. Karnieli-Miller O, Vu TR, Frankel RM, Holtman MC, Clyman SG, Hui SL, et al. Which experiences in the hidden curriculum teach students about professionalism? Acad Med. 2011;86(3):369-77. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e3182087d15