DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Trend of Employment Effect and Employment Policy in the Digital Bio-healthcare Industry

디지털바이오헬스케어산업의 고용효과 추이 변화와 고용정책에 관한 연구

  • Jang, Pil-Ho (Department of Administration and Planning, Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology) ;
  • Kim, Yong-Hwan (Department of Business Administration and Data Science, CHA University)
  • 장필호 (한국산업기술진흥원) ;
  • 김용환 (차의과학대학교 데이터경영학과)
  • Received : 2020.11.06
  • Accepted : 2021.01.20
  • Published : 2021.01.28

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to establish the direction of industrial policy by comparing the employment inducement effect on the related industries of the digital bio-healthcare industry. The analysis data used the three-year input-output table measured by the Bank of Korea. First, the research method was rewritten into 7 major industries to compare statistical data by period. Second, the Bank of Korea's industry-related analysis methodology was utilized. Third, the weight was reflected and compared by employment, production, and investment sectors of the digital bio-healthcare industry. As a result of the analysis, first, the employment sector had a higher effect than the average of the entire industry, second, the production sector was low, and third, the investment sector required investment in the service sector. The conclusions drawn from the analysis showed that direct investment and continuous investment are required in the employment sector, the development of professional manpower is urgent, and direct investment and long-term investment are effective in the production sector.

본 연구의 목적은 디지털바이오헬스케어산업의 연관산업에 대한 고용유발효과를 시기별로 비교 분석하여 효과적인 산업정책을 수립하기 위한 것이다. 연구를 위한 기본데이터는 한국은행이 실측했던 3개년의 산업연관표를 활용하였다. 연구 방법은 첫째, 산업분류 기준이 다른 시기별 통계자료들을 비교분석하기 위해 7대 산업으로 재작성하였다. 둘째, 한국은행의 산업연관분석 방법론으로 비교분석하였다. 셋째, 격차 조정을 위해 가중치를 반영하여 디지털바이오헬스케어산업의 고용, 생산, 투자 부문에서 유발 효과들을 비교분석하였다. 분석 결과는 첫째, 고용 부문에서는 전체 산업의 평균보다 높은 효과가 있고, 둘째, 생산 부문에서는 낮았고, 셋째, 투자 부문에서는 서비스 분야의 투자가 필요하였다. 분석에서 도출된 결론은, 고용 부문에서 직접투자 및 지속적인 투자가 필요하고, 전문 인력의 육성이 시급하며, 생산 부문에서는 직접투자와 장기투자가 효과적인 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Y. C. Lee. (2020). 600 trillion market in 2025 : the desperate need for long-standing regulatory reform. iNew24 (Online). http://www.inews24.com/view/1268261
  2. National IT Industry Promotion Agency (2019). Report by Item: Health Care. Jincheon : NIPA. [Online] https://www.nipa.kr/main/selectBbsNttView.do?key=307&bbsNo=40&nttNo=6862&bbsTy=bbs
  3. Y. W. Shin et al. (2020). Analysis of R&D investment trend and utilization of biohealth convergence technology. Cheongju : KHIDI. [Online] https://www.khidi.or.kr/board/view?pageNum=3&rowCnt=10&no1=339&linkId=48825947&menuId=MENU01783&maxIndex=00488308749998&minIndex=00002120699998&schType=0&schText=&schStartDate=&schEndDate=&boardStyle=&categoryId=&continent=&country=
  4. Joint Report of Related Ministry. (2019). Biohealth Industry Innovation Strategy. Sejong(Online). https://www.mohw.go.kr/react/gm/sgm0601vw.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID=13&MENU_ID=13040201&page=1&CONT_SEQ=351437
  5. K. C. Jung. et al. (2020). Report by Item: Health Care. Sejong : KDI.
  6. J. H. Lee et al. (2020). Economic Outlook Report. Seoul : BOK. [Online] https://www.bok.or.kr/portal/bbs/P0002359/view.do?nttId=10056719&menuNo=200066&pageIndex=1
  7. M. D. Nick & R. D. Philippe. (2020). Shift in the Low Touch Economy, Newyork : Board of innovation. Inc. [Online] https://www.boardofinnovation.com/low-touch-economy/
  8. Korea Employment Information Service. (2010-2020). Yearly statistics of employment insurance Eumseong-gun, Chungcheongbuk-do : KEIS. [Online] http://www.keis.or.kr/user/bbs/main/302/2117/bbsDataList.do
  9. W. K Lee et al. (2014). Industry-related analysis commentary. Seoul : Bank of Korea. [Online] https://www.bok.or.kr/portal/bbs/P0000606/view.do?nttId=206134&menuNo=200612&pageIndex=1
  10. W. Leontief. (1936). Quantitative Input-output Relations in the Economic System of the United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 18(3), 105-125. DOI : 10.2307/1927837
  11. Y. H. Jung. (2001). The Decomposition of the Output Growth of the Health-related Industry : 1985 - 1995. Journal of Korea Association of Health Economics and Policy, 7(1), 39-65.
  12. S. K. Park. (2009). An Analysis of Structural Changes of Industrial Growth Using Industry Association Table. Journal of the Korean Society of Government Studies, 27(3), 219-237.
  13. C. K. Lee & H. U. Gim. (2018). The Decomposition of Production Inducement Effects in the Electronics Industry among Korea, the USA, and Japan Using the World Input Output Table. Journal of Korean National Economy, 36(3), 111-128. DOI : 10.30776/jes.36.3.7
  14. J. H. Lee & S. S. Lim. (2017). An Analysis of Effect in the China's Industrial Structure Change. Journal of Modern Chinese Studies, 19(2), 35-72. https://doi.org/10.35820/JMCS.19.2.2
  15. J. M. Ahn & J. K. Suh. (2017). An Estimation of the Economic Effects of the Healthcare Industry in South Korea. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 13(6), 385-395. DOI : 10.12811/kshsm.2017.11.2.055
  16. P. H. Jang et al. (2020). Analysis on the Ripple and Investment Effect of Digital Bio-Healthcare Industry : Using Input-Output Tables 2019. Journal of internet computing and services, 21(3), 71-81. DOI : 10.7472/jksii.2020.21.3.71
  17. P. H. Jang et al. (2020). A Study on the Employment Effects of the Digital Bio-healthcare Industry. Journal of Information Technology Services, 19(2), 23-35. DOI : 10.9716/KITS.2020.19.2.023
  18. G. C. Jung et al. (2019). 2015 Industry Input Output Table Commentary. Seoul : Bank of Korea.
  19. Y. S. Kim. (2020). Analysis of R&D investment trend and utilization of biohealth convergence technology. Cheongju : KHIDI.