DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Computational Thinking Course on Learning Flow and Collective Self-Efficacy

컴퓨팅 사고력 수업이 학습몰입과 협력적 자기효능감에 미치는 영향

  • Lee, KyungHee (Division of Innovation and Convergence, Hoseo University) ;
  • Park, Hye-Young (Center for Teaching and Learning, Hoseo University)
  • 이경희 (호서대학교 혁신융합학부) ;
  • 박혜영 (호서대학교 교수학습센터)
  • Received : 2020.11.30
  • Accepted : 2021.01.20
  • Published : 2021.01.28

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of computational thinking course on learning flow and collaborative self-efficacy of university students and to explore the effectiveness of computational thinking course as liberal arts education. For this study, 177 freshmen at a university in Chungnam Province were surveyed learning flow and collaborative self-efficiency. The collected data were analyzed with Stata IC 14 for ��2 test and t-test. The results of this study are as follows. First, the learning flow of students who took computational thinking course were significantly higher(t=3.837 p<.001) compared to those who did not. Second, the collective self-efficiency of students who took computational thinking course were significantly higher(t=2.277 p<.01) compared to those who did not. Therefore the results show that computational course has positive effects on learning flow and collaborative self-efficiency of university students. Based on these findings, discussions and implications were presented on the importance and effectiveness of computational thinking course.

본 연구의 목적은 컴퓨팅 사고력 수업이 대학생의 학습몰입과 협력적 자기효능감에 미치는 영향을 살펴보고 이를 통해 교양교육으로써 컴퓨팅 사고력 수업 효과를 탐색하는 데 있다. 본 연구를 위해 충남의 4년제 대학 1학년 학생 177명을 대상으로 학습몰입과 협력적 자기효능감 설문을 시행하였다. 수집된 자료는 Stata IC 14를 사용하여 ��2 test와 t-test 분석을 시행하였다. 본 연구를 통해 도출된 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 컴퓨팅 사고력 수업을 수강한 학생의 학습몰입은 수강하지 않은 학생과 비교해 유의(t=3.837 p<.001)하게 높게 나타났다. 둘째, 컴퓨팅 사고력 수업을 수강한 학생의 협력적 자기효능감은 수강하지 않은 학생과 비교해 유의(t=2.277 p<.01)하게 높게 나타났다. 따라서 컴퓨팅 사고력 수업은 학습몰입과 협력적 자기효능감에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 이와 같은 연구 결과를 바탕으로 컴퓨팅 사고력 수업의 중요성과 효과, 논의와 시사점을 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. S. H. Park. (2016). Study of SW Education in University to enhance Computational Thinking. Journal of Digital Convergence. 14(4), 1-10. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2016.14.4.1
  2. S. H. Jung. (2019). Analysis of the effectiveness of liberal computing classes in terms of computational thinking. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology. 9(10), 235-243. DOI : 10.35873/ajmahs.2019.9.10.021
  3. K. K. Kim & J. Y. Lee. (2016). Analysis of the Effectiveness of Computational Thinking-Based Programming Learning. The Journal of Korean association of computer education. 19(1), 27-39. DOI : 10.32431/kace.2016.19.1.004
  4. Y. J. Lee. & Y. S. Kim. (2020). Comparison of Computational Thinking Improvement Based on Teaching Aids and Student's Level in Elementary Software Education. The Journal of Korean association of computer education. 23(2), 31-39. DOI : 10.32431/kace.2020.23.2.004
  5. K. H. Lee & J. W. Cho. (2019). The Effectiveness Improvement of Computational Thinking through Digital Media Production. Journal of Digital Contents Society, 20(8), 1523-1531. https://doi.org/10.9728/dcs.2019.20.8.1523
  6. E. K. Lee & Y. J. Lee. (2008). The Effects of Scratch Based Programming Education on Middle School Students' Flow Level and Programming Achievement. Secondary Education Research. 56(20), 359-382. https://doi.org/10.25152/ser.2008.56.2.359
  7. J. Y. Park & M. H. Kang. (2015). Structural Relationships Among Learners' Characters, Learning Flow, and Thinking Ability in a SCRATCH Programming Course for Elementary School Students. The Journal of Elementary Education. 28(4), 145-170. DOI : 10.25152/ser.2008.56.2.359
  8. H. S. Choi. (2018). Domestic Literature Review on Computational Thinking Development through Software Programming Education. Journal of Educational Technology. 34(3), 743-774. DOI : 10.17232/KSET.34.3.743
  9. S. Papert. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.
  10. J. Wing. (2011). Research Notebook: Computational Thinking - What and Why? The Link. Pittsburgh, PA: Carneige Mellon (Online). https://www.cs.cmu.edu/link/research-notebookcomputational-thinking-what-and-why
  11. S. H. Kim & J. B. Chae. (2014). Analysis of Trends and Teaching-Learning Cases of Programming Language for Google Education. KERIS.
  12. J. Nakamura & M. Csikszentmihalyi. (2009). Flow Theory and Research. In The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology, 195-206.
  13. M. Csikszentmihalyi. (2014). Applications of Flow in Human Development and Education (pp. 153-172). Dordrecht: Springer.
  14. J. A. Fredricks & P. C. Blumenfeld. (2004). School engagement: Potentioal of the concept, state dof evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. DOI : 10.3102/00346543074001059
  15. A. Bandura. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  16. K. Y. Lim. (2011). Self-efficacy in Group Investigation Collaborative Learning. Koreanisch-Deutsche Gesellschaft Fuer Erziehungswissenschaft, 16(2), 19-36. UCI : G704-001913.2011.16.2.005
  17. S. B. Alavi & J. McCormic. (2008). The roles of perceived task interdependence and group members' interdependence in the development of collective efficacy in university student group context. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 78, 375-393. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709907X240471
  18. M. M. Handelsman, L. W. Briggs, N. Sullivan & A. Towler. (2005). A Measure of College Student Course Engagement. The Journal of Educational Research. 98(3), 184-192. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.98.3.184-192
  19. J. W. Yoo. (2011). The structural relationship among social factor, psychological mediators and motivational factor for enhancing learners' engagement. Doctoral dissertation. Ewha Womans University, Seoul.
  20. S. J. Han & S. S. Kim. (2018). The Effect of Learning Flow and Learning Satisfaction from App Programming Education Using m-Bizmaker. The Journal of Korean association of computer education. 21(2), 41-48. DOI : 10.32431/kace.2018.21.2.005
  21. K. H. Park & J. M. Lee. (2018). The Relationship among Self-Directed Learning Ability, Self-Efficacy for Group Work, Teachers' Autonomy Support, Learning Outcomes in Flipped Learning Environment. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media. 24(1), 147-175. DOI : 10.15833/KAFEIAM.24.1.147
  22. B. S. Park. (2019). The Effect of Project Based Learning on Self-Efficacy for Group Work, Perceived Interaction and Flow of Pre-service Early Childhood Special Education Teacher. Korean Journal of Early Childhood Special Education. 19(4), 29-48. DOI : 10.21214/kecse.2019.19.4.29