Journal of Korea Entertainment Industry Association (한국엔터테인먼트산업학회논문지)

The Korea Entertainment Industry Association (한국엔터테인먼트산업학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Associativity Among OTPF and the International Classification of Function, Disorder and Health : Focusing on the Activity and Participation Centered on Life Care

OTPF와 국제 기능·장애·건강 분류간의 연관성 : 라이프케어 중심의 활동과 참여 관점으로

  • Bae, Seong-Hwan (Department of Occupational Therapy, Graduate School of Dongshin University) ;
  • Jang, Yeon-Sig (Department of Occupational Therapy, Chunnam Techno University) ;
  • Kim, Hee-Dong (Department of Occupational Therapy, DongShin University) ;
  • Baek, Ji-Young (Department of Occupational Therapy, DongShin University)
  • 배성환 (동신대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 장연식 (전남과학대학교 작업치료과) ;
  • 김희동 (동신대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 백지영 (동신대학교 작업치료학과)
  • Received : 2020.09.24
  • Accepted : 2020.10.27
  • Published : 2020.10.31
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to identify the associativity between OTPF and ICF, present the relevance and difference of theoretical concept of OTPF-3 and ICF regarding of the participation and to identify if ICF can explain the professional area of occupational therapy. For this purpose, 4 experts of occupational therapy have made a comparative analysis of the subclassification codes of OTPF-3's work area subsection and of ICF activity and participation. As a result, connecting the most subclassification codes of OTPF-3's work area subsection and of ICF activity and participation, they demonstrated the conceptual similarity and difference. Through this, it is judged to explain the area of occupational therapy with ICF for non-expert and other experts, but it is considered to have limitation to the communication between the experts of occupational therapy. In order to overcome the difference between OTPF and ICF, it would be necessary to have much more researches of comparing widely OTPF and ICF from the perspective of occupational therapy.

본 연구의 목적은 OTPF와 ICF의 연관성을 알아보는 것을 통하여 참여에 대한 OTPF-3와 ICF의 이론적 개념의 관련성과 차이를 명백히 제시하고, ICF가 작업치료 전문영역을 충분히 설명할 수 있는지 알아보고자 하였다. 이를 위해 OTPF-3의 작업 영역 하위항목과 ICF의 활동과 참여 세부분류 코드를 4명의 작업치료 전문가들이 비교분석 하였다. 그 결과, OTPF-3의 작업 영역 하위항목과 ICF의 활동과 참여 세부분류 코드 대부분을 연결하여 개념적 유사성과 차이점을 입증하였다. 이를 통하여 비전문가 및 타분야 전문가들에게 ICF를 활용하여 작업치료의 영역을 설명할 수 있을 것으로 판단되지만, 작업치료 전문가 간 의사소통에는 제한이 있을 것으로 사료된다. OTPF와 ICF의 차이점을 극복하기 위해서는 작업치료 관점에서 OTPF와 ICF를 더 넓고 깊게 비교하는 연구들이 더 많이 진행되어야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Nelson, D.L.(1994). Occupational form, occupational performance, and therapeutic occupation. AOTA self study series: The practice of the future: Putting occupation back into therapy. Lesson, 2.
  2. Stamm, T.A., Cieza, A., Machold, K., Smolen, J.S., & Stucki, G.(2006). Exploration of the link between conceptual occupational therapy models and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 53(1): 9-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.2005.00513.x
  3. Radomski, M.V., & Latham, C.A.T.(Eds.).(2013). Trombly's Occupational Therapy for Physical Dysfunction, 7th [IE]. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  4. Weinstock-Zlotnick, G., & Hinojosa, J.(2004). Bottom-up or top-down evaluation: Is one better than the other?. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58(5): 594-599. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.58.5.594
  5. Pendleton, H.M., & Schultz-Krohn, W.(2017). Pedretti's Occupational therapy: Practice skills for physical dysfunction. Elsevier Health Sciences.
  6. 박헌주(2015). 작업치료와 ICF의 개념 및 가치 비교분석연구. 우송대학교 보건복지대학원, 석사학위논문.
  7. 안승헌, 박대성, 이석민(2009). 뇌졸중 환자의 기능 분석을 위한 ICF 의 임상 적용. 대한작업치료학회지, 17(4): 37-44.
  8. Haglund, L., & Henriksson, C.(2003). Concepts in occupational therapy in relation to the ICF. Occupational Therapy International, 10(4): 253-268. https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.189
  9. 김완호, 이승욱, 변경희(2006). 장애평가와 재활서비스 제공을 위한 국제장애분류(ICF)의 임상적 적용. 국립재활원, 보건복지부.
  10. Stamm, T.A., Cieza, A., Machold, K.P., Smolen, J.S., & Stucki, G.(2004). Content comparison of occupation-based instruments in adult rheumatology and musculoskeletal rehabilitation based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Arthritis Care & Research, 51(6): 917-924. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.20842
  11. Ballert, C.S., Hopfe, M., Kus, S., Mader, L., & Prodinger, B.(2019). Using the refined ICF linking rules to compare the content of existing instruments and assessments: a systematic review and exemplary analysis of instruments measuring participation. Disability and rehabilitation, 41(5): 584-600. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1198433
  12. Cieza, A., Brockow, T., Ewert, T., Amman, E., Kollerits, B., Chatterji, S., ustun, B. & Stucki, G.(2002). Linking health-status measurements to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 34(5): 205-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/165019702760279189
  13. Cieza, A., Fayed, N., Bickenbach, J., & Prodinger, B.(2019). Refinements of the ICF Linking Rules to strengthen their potential for establishing comparability of health information. Disability and rehabilitation, 41(5): 574-583. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2016.1145258
  14. American Occupational Therapy Association. (2014). Occupational Therapy practice framework: Domain and process 3rd edition. American J ournal of Occupational Therapy, 68(supplement 1): s1-s48.
  15. 국립재활원(2015). ICF 기반의 장애인 표준건강정보 개발 및 데이터 추적 체계 구축. 국립재활원 재활연구소.
  16. 대한작업치료사협회(2019). 의료기관 중심의 작업치료중재 용어집 2nd Edition. 대한작업치료사협회.
  17. 보건복지부(2004). ICF 국제기능장애건강분류.
  18. 변경희, 신형익, 임정기, 이미정, 이정은, 이문규, 이지은, 김희선(2016). 국제기능장애건강분류체계(ICF) 활용방안 연구. 한신대학교 산학협력단.
  19. 송영진, 우희순, 이향숙, 이미영, 권이영, 차유진(2016). 한국형 의료기관 중심 작업치료기록 표준용어 개발. 대한작업치료학회지, 24(2): 112-124.
  20. 일상생활활동 교재편찬위원회(2017). 일상생활활동. 현문사.
  21. 통계청(2010). 사용자를 위한 ICF 활용 길잡이.
  22. Cieza, A., Geyh, S., Chatterji, S., Kostanjsek, N., ustun, B., & Stucki, G.(2005). ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 37(4): 212-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970510040263
  23. Hemmingsson, H., & Jonsson, H.(2005). An occupational perspective on the concept of participation in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-some critical remarks. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59(5): 569-576. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.59.5.569
  24. Magasi, S., & Post, M.W.(2010). A comparative review of contemporary participation measures' psychometric properties and content coverage. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 91(9): S17-S28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.011
  25. Noonan, V.K., Kopec, J.A., Noreau, L., Singer, J., Chan, A., Masse, L.C., & Dvorak, M.F.(2009). Comparing the content of participation instruments using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Health and quality of life outcomes, 7(1): 93. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-7-93
  26. Pettersson, I., Pettersson, V., & Frisk, M.(2012). ICF from an occupational therapy perspective in adult care: an integrative literature review. Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy, 19(3): 260-273. https://doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2011.557087
  27. Schroeder, C., & Benedict, P.(1984). Egress During Fire-Wheelchair Exiting in an Emergency. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 38(8): 541-542. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.38.8.541
  28. Stamm, T.(2005). Conceptualising the patient perspective of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). lmu. Doctoral dissertation.
  29. World Health Organization.(1999). International classification of functioning and disability: ICIDH-2 (No. WHO/HSC/ACE/99.2). World Health Organization.
  30. 송지영(2019). 만성질환 여성 노인의 삶의 만족도에 관한 연구. 한국엔터테인먼트산업학회 논문지, 13(5): 273-280.
  31. 신정훈(2019). 고령자의 성별 및 연령별 대사증후군에 따른 생활습관과 노인체력 비교분석. 한국엔터테인먼트산업학회논문지, 13(6): 155-163.
  32. 이은원, 송지영(2019). 지체장애인의 정신적 건강상태 영향요인. 한국엔터테인먼트산업학회논문지, 13(6): 287-295.