정보교육학회논문지 (Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education)

  • 제24권4호
  • /
  • Pages.327-335
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1229-3245(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-8428(eISSN)
한국정보교육학회 (Korea Association of Information Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

초등학교 로봇 활용 교육에서 좌우뇌선호에 따른 컴퓨팅사고력, 로봇에 대한 태도의 차이

A Study on the Difference of Computational Thinking and Attitude according to Left and Right Brain Preference

  • Noh, Jiyae (Department of Education, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2020.07.18
  • 심사 : 2020.08.07
  • 발행 : 2020.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 로봇 활용 교육이 컴퓨팅사고력, 로봇에 대한 태도에 미치는 효과를 살펴보고, 좌, 우뇌 선호에 따른 차이를 알아보고자 하였다. 이를 위해 서울 소재 A 청소년수련관 방학 특강에 참여한 초등학생 17명을 대상으로 로봇 활용 교육을 실시하고, 대응 표본 t검정, 맨-휘트니 유 검정을 통해 평균의 차이를 분석하였다. 연구 결과, 로봇 활용 교육을 실시한 후 컴퓨팅사고력 점수의 차이는 통계적으로 유의하였으나, 로봇에 대한 태도 점수의 차이는 통계적으로 유의하지 않았다. 더불어, 좌우뇌선호에 따른 컴퓨팅사고력, 로봇에 대한 태도의 차이는 유의하지 않았다. 본 연구는 로봇 활용 교육의 효과를 검증하고, 좌우뇌선호에 따른 차이를 분석하여, 로봇 활용 교육에 대한 이해를 확장시켰다는 점에서 연구의 의의를 찾을 수 있다.

This study intends to examine the effects of education using robot on computational thinking and attitudes according to left and right brain preference. To execute the study, 17 elementary students at A youth training center in Seoul were selected to participate in the education. And the mean difference was analyzed using matched pair t-test and Mann-Whitey U test. As a result, after participating in the education, there was some statistical significance found in the scores to test student's computational thinking, but not statistical significance on the attitudes. Furthermore, there was no significance found in computational thinking or attitude according to the left and right brain preference. The purpose of this study can be found in that it expands the understanding of education using robot by verifying the efficacy and analyzing differences according to left and right brain preference.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Byun, M. H. & Kang, K. J. (2005). The Effect of a Group Art Therapy to Improve Self-Esteem on North Korean Youths in South Korea. Korean Journal of Youth Studies 12(1), 127-150.
  2. Choi, H. S. (2014). Development of a Holistic Measure of Learning Effects in Robotics Program: Connecting Sociocultural Context and Computational Thinking. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 18(4), 541-548. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2014.18.4.541
  3. Choi, H. S. & Lee, J. M (2020). The Effects of Educational Robot-based SW Convergence Education on Primary Students' Computational Thinking, Collaborative and Communication Skills. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 24(2), 131-130. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2020.24.2.131
  4. Chun, S. J. (2018). Effects of SW Training using Robot Based on Card Coding on Learning Motivation and Attitude. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 22(4), 447– 455.
  5. Cuny, J., Snyder, L., & Wing, J.M. (2010). Demystifying computational thinking for noncomputer scientists. Unpublished manuscript in progress, referenced in http://www.cs.cmu.edu/-CompThink/resources/TheLinkWing.pdf
  6. Jang, Y. K. (2016) A Study on Connections between Brain Preference and Art Teaching Anxiety of Elementary School Teachers. Daegu National University of Education.
  7. Jung, D. H. & Park, S. O. (2010). A Study on the Problem Solving Styles according to Left/Right Brain Preference of Earth Science Gifted Students. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 31(2), 172-184. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2010.31.2.172
  8. Karaahmetoglu, K., & Korkmaz, Ö. (2019). The Effect of Project-Based Arduino Educational Robot Applications on Students' Computational Thinking Skills and Their Perception of Basic Stem Skill Levels. Online Submission, 6(2), 1-14.
  9. Kim et al,. (2015). Development of teaching learning model about SW education. KERIS, CR 2015-35.
  10. Kim, E. S. & Shin, H. J. (2008). Exploratory Study of Brain Preference Indicators : BPI, HMI, SQM and SOLAT. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 10(5), 2517-2533.
  11. Kim, S. W., & Lee, Y. J. (2016). The Effects of Robot Programming on the Attitudes toward Robot of Pre-service Teachers'. The Journal of Korean association of computer education, 19(6). 91-103. https://doi.org/10.32431/KACE.2016.19.6.009
  12. Lee, E. M., & Lee, G. M. (2019). The Effects of Group Art Therapy Program on Ego-Resilience of Adolescents with Emotional․Behavioral Support Needs. Journal of Clinical Art Psychotherapy, 9, 81-99.
  13. Lee, Y. H., & Moon, O. S. (2018). Development of Physical Computing Education Program for Lower Grades in Elementary School - PACS program based on turtle robot. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 9(1), 1-9.
  14. Lee, Y. S., Choi, J. R., & Lee, M. Y. (2016). Awareness of and needs for r-learning-based STEAM in early childhood teachers. Journal of Early Childhood Education. 36(2), 123-146
  15. McCallum, R. S., & Glynn, S. M. (1979). Hemispheric specialization and creative behavior. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 13(4), 263-273. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1979.tb00215.x
  16. Ministry of education (2015). SW education operation guidelines.
  17. Noh, J. Y. & Lee, J. M. (2017). The Effects of SW Education Using Robot on Computational thinking. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 21(3), 285-296. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.21.3.285
  18. Nomura, T., Suzuki, T., Kanda, T., & Kato, K. (2006). Measurement of Negative Attitudes toward Robots. Interaction Studies, 7(3), 437-454. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.7.3.14nom
  19. Oflaz, M. (2011). The effect of right and left brain dominance in language learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1507-1513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.320
  20. Park, H. M. (2009). Effect of forming groups according to the brain hemisphere preference on the cooperative problem solving learning achievement in the middle school technology. Journal of Korean Institute of Industrial Educators. 34(2). 205-229.
  21. Shin, N. M. & Kim, S. A. (2009). Korean Students' Attitudes Towards Robots: Two Survey Studies. The journal of Korea Robotics Society, 4(1), 10-16.
  22. Shim, S. K. & Lee, K. H. (2010) A Study on Math anxiety according to the features of brain preference. Journal of the Korean school mathematics society, 13(3), 443-458.
  23. Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational Thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
  24. Wonder, J. and Donovan, P., (1984). Whole Brain Thinking. Ballantine, NY, USA.
  25. Yi, S. Y., & Lee, Y. J. (2018). A Study on SW Education-centered Elementary STEAM Education through Case Analysis of SW Education Leading School. Convergence Education Review, 3(1), 23-34.
  26. Yoon, J. J. & Kim, H. J. (2009). The Relationship between Preschool Teachers' Hemispheric Mode Indicator and Creative Personality. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 10(1), 305-316. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2010.10.1.305