한국중재학회지:중재연구 (Journal of Arbitration Studies)

한국중재학회 (The Korean Association of Arbitration Studies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

ICSID 중재의 임시적 처분 구속력과 미준수 효과에 관한 연구

A Study on the Binding Power of Interim Measures and the Effect of Interim Measure Non-Compliance in ICSID Arbitration

  • 하현수 (전북대학교 상과대학 무역학과)
  • 투고 : 2020.04.16
  • 심사 : 2020.05.31
  • 발행 : 2020.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study focuses on the binding power of the interim measures of the arbitral tribunal in ICSID arbitration and the effects of non-compliance. Upon consideration of the intentions of those who made these rules, given the interpretation of the provisions of Article 47 of the ICSID Convention and Article 39 of the ICSID Arbitration Rules, it was found reasonable to consider that the interim measures made by the arbitral tribunal in ICSID arbitration were not binding. However, in actual ICSID arbitration, most arbitral tribunals approve the binding power of the interim measures based on the purposes and the characteristics of the interim measures. As such, there is a certain distance between the legislative intention for interim measures in ICSID arbitration and the judicial practice, but considering the demand for maintaining the integrity of the arbitration procedure, it is reasonable to consider that the interim measures are binding. In addition, the fact that the interim measures have binding power can increase the possibility that the party will comply with the interim measures. Thus, the binding power of interim measures not only encourages voluntary compliance to the interim measures of the party, but can also cause negative consequences for the party if it is not met. In other words, the arbitral tribunal will be able to form negative inferences against the party who does not comply with it in a procedural side, and in the practical side, the party who does not comply with the interim measures will be compensated for the additional damages for non-compliance.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김인호, "긴급중재인이 내린 긴급처분의 효력", 국제거래법연구, 제27집 제1호, 2018.
  2. 목영준, 상사중재법, 박영사, 2011.
  3. 석광현, "2016년 중재법에 따른 중재판정부의 임시적 처분 -민사집행법에 따른 보전처분과의 정합성에 대한 문제 제기를 포함하여-", 국제거래법연구, 제26집 제1호, 2017.
  4. 신희택, "국제분쟁해결의 맥락에서 본 국제투자중재 -ICSID 협약에 의한 투자협정중재를 중심으로-", 서울대학교 법학, 제55권 제2호, 2014.
  5. 이강빈, "국제상사중재에서 중재판정부의 권한과 임시적 처분에 관한 연구", 중재연구, 제18권 제2호, 2008. https://doi.org/10.16998/JAS.2008.18.2.33
  6. 이성덕, "영사 보호와 LaGrad 사건", 홍익법학, 제3권, 2001.
  7. 주이화.배상필.심상렬, "중재판정부의 임시적 처분과 국제중재기관들의 긴급중재인 제도 비교 연구", 중재연구, 제22권 제3호, 2012.
  8. 하현수, "국제투자중재의 판정취소제도에 관한 연구", 관세학회지, 제13권 제2호, 2012.
  9. 하현수, "긴급중재인 제도관련 중국 중재기관의 규정 및 태도", 중재연구, 제26권 제4호, 2016. https://doi.org/10.16998/JAS.2016.26.4.43
  10. 한종규, "국제중재의 활성화를 위한 법원의 역할 -중재판정의 임시적 처분을 중심으로-", 이화여자대학교 법학논집, 제20권 제3호, 2016.
  11. 石儉平, "中國參與ICSID機制的雙重挑戰及其應對策略", 學習與實踐, 2016年第12期, 2016.
  12. 王軍杰, "ICSID上訴機制建構的法理基礎及制度選擇", 社會科學輯刊, 2018年第5期(總第238期), 2018.
  13. 張乃根, "ICSID 仲裁中的有效解釋原則: 溯源,活用及其略費", 武大國際法評論, 2017年第1期, 2017.
  14. 張川方, "論ICSID仲裁中臨時措施的遵守", 國際經貿探索, 第34卷第7期, 2018.
  15. 黃立萍, "ICSID管轄權擴大法律問題硏究", 法制博覽, 2017年第7(上)期, 2017.
  16. Association for International Arbitration, Interim Measures in International Commercial Arbitration, Antwerpen/Apeldoom, 2007.
  17. Bismuth, Regis, "Anatomy of the Law and Practice of Interim Protective Measures in International Investment Arbitration", Journal of International Arbitration, 26(6), 2009.
  18. Brower, Charles N., Ronald E. M. Goodman, "Provisional Measures and the Protection of ICSID Jurisdictional Exclusivity against Municipal Proceeding", ICSID Review (Foreign Investment Law Journal), 6(2), 1991.
  19. Caron, David D., "Interim Measures of Protection: Theory and Practice in Light of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal", ZEITSCHRIFT FUR AUSLANDISCHES OFFENTLICHES RECHT UND VOLKERRECHT, 46, 1986.
  20. Donovan, Donald Francis, "The Scope and Enforceability of Provisional Measures in International Commercial Arbitration: A Survey of Jurisdictions, the Work of UNCITRAL and Proposals for Moving Forward" in Albert Jan van den Berg, International Commercial Arbitration; Important Contemporary Questions, ICCA Congress Series No. 11, Kluwer Law International, 2003.
  21. Friedland, Paul D., "Provisional Measures and ICSID Arbitration", Arbitration International, 2(4), 1986.
  22. Gantz, David A., "Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. Canada", American Journal of International Law, 97(4), 2003.
  23. ICSID, History of the ICSID Convention: Documents Concerning the Origin and the Formulation of the Convention, Volume II, 1968.
  24. Kolb, Robert, "Note on the New International Case-Law Concerning the Binding Character of Provisional Measures", Nordic Journal of International Law, 74(1), 2005.
  25. Masood, Arshad, "Provisional Measures of Protection in Arbitration under the World Bank Convention", Delhi Law Review, 1(1), 1972.
  26. Schreuer, Christoph H., The ICSID Convention: A Commentary, Cambridge University Press, 2001.
  27. UNCTAD, "Special Update on Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Facts and Figures", IIA Issues Note, Issue 3, November 2017.
  28. Yesilirmak, Ali, Provisional Measures in International Commercial Arbitration, Kluwer Law International, 2005.
  29. AGIP S.p.A. v. People's Republic of Congo, ICSID Case No. ARB/77/1, Award, November 30, 1979.
  30. Biwater Gauff(Tanzania) Ltd. v. United Republic of Tanzania, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/22, Procedural order No. 3, September 29, 2006.
  31. City Oriente Ltd. v. The Republic of Ecuador and Empresa Estatal Petroleos del Ecuador (Petroecuador), ICSID Case No. ARB/06/21, Decision on Provisional Measures, November 19, 2007.
  32. Emilio Agustin Maffezini v. The Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/97/7, Decision on Request for Provisional Measures, October 28, 1999.
  33. Hela Schwarz GmbH v. People's Republic of China, ICSID Case No. ARB/17/19, Procedural Order No. 2 - Decision on the Claimant's Request for Provisional Measures, August 10, 2018.
  34. LaGrand Case(Germany v. U.S.A.), Judgment of 27 June, 2001, ICJ.
  35. Maritime International Nominees Establishment v. Republic of Guinea, ICSID Case No. ARB/84/4, Order for Interim Measures, December 4, 1985.
  36. Occidental Petroleum Corp. and Occidental Exploration & Production Co. v. The Republic of Ecuador, ICSID Case No. ARB/06/11, Decision on Provisional Measures, August 17, 2007.
  37. Plama Consortium Ltd. v. Republic of Bulgaria, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/24, Order, September 6, 2005.
  38. Saipem S.p.A. v. The People's Republic of Bangladesh, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/07, Decision on Jurisdiction and Recommendation on Provisional Measures, March 21, 2007.
  39. SGS Societe Generale de Surveillance S. A. v. Islamic Republic of Pakistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/13, Procedural Order No. 2, October 16, 2002.
  40. Spyridon Roussalis v. Romania, ICSID Case No. ARB/06/1, Decision on Provisional Measures, July 22, 2008.
  41. Tokios Tokeles v. Ukraine, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/18, Order No.1 Claimant's Request for Provisional Measures, July 1, 2003.
  42. Zhinvali Development Ltd. v. Republic of Georgia, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/1, Order, January 24, 2002, cited in Award, January 24, 2003.