대한간호학회지 (Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing)

한국간호과학회 (Korean Society of Nursing Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한국어판 폐경 특이형 삶의 질 측정도구의 신뢰도와 타당도 검증

Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Menopause-Specific Quality of Life

  • 박진희 (아주대학교 간호대학.간호과학연구소) ;
  • 배선형 (아주대학교 간호대학.간호과학연구소) ;
  • 정영미 (청주대학교 보건의료과학대학 간호학과)
  • Park, Jin-Hee (College of Nursing.Research Institute of Nursing Science, Ajou University) ;
  • Bae, Sun Hyoung (College of Nursing.Research Institute of Nursing Science, Ajou University) ;
  • Jung, Young-Mi (Department of Nursing, College of Health & Medical Science, Cheongju University)
  • 투고 : 2020.02.25
  • 심사 : 2020.05.22
  • 발행 : 2020.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Korean version of Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL). Methods: The MENQOL was translated into Korean according to algorithm of linguistic validation process. A total of 308 menopausal women were recruited and assessed using the Korean version of MENQOL (MENQOL-K), the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF), and Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D-K). In estimating reliability, internal consistency reliability coefficients were calculated. Validity was evaluated through criterion validity and construct validity with confirmatory factor analyses using SPSS 23.0 and AMOS 25.0 software. Results: In item analyses, the "increased facial hair" symptom was excluded because of the low contribution of MENQOL-K. The confirmatory factor analysis supported good fit and reliable scores for MENQOL-K model, and the four-factor structure was validated (χ2=553.28, p<.001, NC=1.84, RMSEA=.05, AGIF=.85, AIC=765.28). The MENQOL-K consists of 28 items in 4 domains, including vasomotor (3 items), psychosocial (7 items), physical (15 items), and sexual subscales (3 items). There was an acceptable criterion validity with moderately significant correlation between MENQOL-K and WHOQOL-BREF. The Cronbach's α for the 4 subsacles ranged from .80 to .93. Conclusion: The MENQOL-K is a valid and reliable scale to measure condition-specific quality of life for perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. It can be used to assess the impact of menopausal symptoms on the quality of life of Korean women in clinical trials.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Berecki-Gisolf J, Begum N, Dobson AJ. Symptoms reported by women in midlife: Menopausal transition or aging? Menopause. 2009;16(5):1021-1029. https://doi.org/10.1097/gme.0b013e3181a8c49f
  2. Hoga L, Rodolpho J, Goncalves B, Quirino B. Women's experience of menopause: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports. 2015;13(8):250-337. https://doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1948
  3. Yim G, Ahn Y, Chang Y, Ryu S, Lim JY, Kang D, et al. Prevalence and severity of menopause symptoms and associated factors across menopause status in Korean women. Menopause. 2015;22(10):1108-1116. https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000000438
  4. Jenabi E, Shobeiri F, Hazavehei SM, Roshanaei G. Assessment of questionnaire measuring quality of life in menopausal women: A systematic review. Oman Medical Journal. 2015;30(3):151-156. https://doi.org/10.5001/omj.2015.34
  5. Poomalar GK, Arounassalame B. The quality of life during and after menopause among rural women. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2013;7(1):135-139. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2012/4910.2688
  6. Park HS, Kim AJ, Bae KE. Life stress, life satisfaction, and adaptation of middle-aged women in the menopause period. Korean Parent-Child Health Journal. 2010;13(2):55-62.
  7. Na YJ. Impact of menopause on the women's health. Journal of the Korean Medical Association. 2019;62(3):141-144. https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2019.62.3.141
  8. Fletcher AE, Bulpitt CJ. Measurement of quality of life in clinical trials of therapy. Cardiology. 1988;75 Suppl 1:41-52. https://doi.org/10.1159/000174444
  9. Hilditch JR, Lewis J, Peter A, van Maris B, Ross A, Franssen E, et al. A menopause-specific quality of life questionnaire: Development and psychometric properties. Maturitas. 1996 Jul;24(3):161-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-5122(96)82006-8.
  10. Sydora BC, Fast H, Campbell S, Yuksel N, Lewis JE, Ross S. Use of the Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) questionnaire in research and clinical practice: A comprehensive scoping review. Menopause. 2016;23(9):1038-1051. https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000000636
  11. Lewis JE, Hilditch JR, Wong CJ. Further psychometric property development of the Menopause-Specific Quality of Life questionnaire and development of a modified version, MENQOL-Intervention questionnaire. Maturitas. 2005;50(3):209-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2004.06.015
  12. ePROVIDE [Internet]. Lyon: Mapi Research Trust; c2005 [cited 2018 Feb 2]. Available from: https://eprovide.mapi-trust.org/instruments/menopause-specific-quality-of-life-questionnaire#languages.
  13. Hasan SS, Ahmadi K, Santigo R, Ahmed SI. The validity of the Menopause-specific Quality of Life questionnaire in women with type 2 diabetes. Climacteric. 2014;17(4):456-464. https://doi.org/10.3109/13697137.2013.864269
  14. Dolye C, Adams L, McAndrew A, Burlein-Hall S, DasGupta T, Blake J, et al. Validation of the MENQOL for use with women who have been treated for gynecologic or breast cancer. Canadian Oncology Nursing Journal. 2018;28(3):228-233.
  15. Palacios S, Henderson VW, Siseles N, Tan D, Villaseca P. Age of menopause and impact of climacteric symptoms by geographical region. Climacteric. 2010;13(5):419-428. https://doi.org/10.3109/13697137.2010.507886
  16. Nie G, Yang H, Liu J, Zhao C, Wang X. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Menopause-Specific Quality-of-Life questionnaire. Menopause. 2017;24(5):546-554. https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000000784
  17. Park YJ, Gu BS, Kang HC, Chun SH, Yoon JW. The menopausal age and climacteric symptoms, and the related factors of Korean women. Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing. 2001;7(4):473-485. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2001.7.4.473
  18. Yun MH, Kim HJ. A study on relations among general characteristics, lifestyle habits, and menopausal symptoms measurement indicators during treatment for hot flush in menopausal women. The Journal of Korean Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2011;24(4):114-125. https://doi.org/10.15204/jkobgy.2011.24.4.114
  19. Sohn JN. Factors influencing depression in middle aged women: Focused on quality of life on menopause. Journal of Health Informatics and Statistics. 2018;43(2):148-157. https://doi.org/10.21032/jhis.2018.43.2.148
  20. Park KI, Park YK, Park KS, Hwang DS, Lee CH, Jang JB, et al. A study on the relationship between body composition and Menopause Rating Scale (MRS), the Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) of postmenopausal women. The Journal of Korean Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015;28(1):85-91. https://doi.org/10.15204/jkobgy.2015.28.1.085
  21. Kim MJ, Cho J, Ahn Y, Yim G, Park HY. Association between physical activity and menopausal symptoms in perimenopausal women. BMC Women's Health. 2014;14:122. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-14-122
  22. Harlow SD, Gass M, Hall JE, Lobo R, Maki P, Rebar RW, et al. Executive summary of the Stages of Reproductive Aging Workshop +10: Addressing the unfinished agenda of staging reproductive aging. Climacteric. 2012;15(2):105-114. https://doi.org/10.3109/13697137.2011.650656
  23. DeVellis RF. Scale development: Theory and applications. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications; 2016. p. 134-145.
  24. WHOQOL Group. Development of the WHOQOL: Rationale and current status. International Journal of Mental Health. 1994;23(3):24-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207411.1994.11449286
  25. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement. 1977;1(3):385-401. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167700100306
  26. Cho MJ, Kim KH. Use of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) Scale in Korea. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 1998;186(5):304-310. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-199805000-00007
  27. Ghazanfarpour M, Kaviani M, Rezaiee M, Ghaderi E, Zandvakili F. Cross cultural adaptation of the menopause specific questionnaire into the Persian language. Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research. 2014;4(3):325-329. https://doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.133453
  28. Phligbua W, Smith EML, Barton DL. Psychometric properties of the Menopause Specific Quality of Life questionnaire among Thai women with a history of breast cancer. European Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2018;36:75-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2018.08.008
  29. Geldhof GJ, Preacher KJ, Zyphur MJ. Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework. Psychological Methods. 2014;19(1):72-91. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032138
  30. Lee JY. Advanced nursing statistics. Paju: Soomoonsa; 2016. p. 231-264.
  31. Hair JF Jr, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). 2nd ed. Los Angeles (CA): SAGE Publications; 2016. p. 111-144.
  32. Van Dole KB, DeVellis RF, Brown RD, Jonsson Funk ML, Gaynes BN, Williams RE. Evaluation of the Menopause-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire: A factor-analytic approach. Menopause. 2012;19(2):211-215. https://doi.org/10.1097/gme.0b013e31822817f9
  33. Ceylan B, Ozerdogan N. Menopausal symptoms and quality of life in Turkish women in the climacteric period. Climacteric. 2014;17(6):705-712. https://doi.org/10.3109/13697137.2014.929108
  34. Smail L, Jassim G, Shakil A. Menopause-specific quality of life among Emirati women. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(1):40. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010040
  35. Webster AD, Finstad DA, Kurzer MS, Torkelson CJ. Quality of life among postmenopausal women enrolled in the Minnesota Green Tea Trial. Maturitas. 2018;108:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.10.013
  36. Maki PM, Kornstein SG, Joffe H, Bromberger JT, Freeman EW, Athappilly G, et al. Guidelines for the evaluation and treatment of perimenopausal depression: Summary and recommendations. Menopause. 2018;25(10):1069-1085. https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000001174
  37. Farrell AM. Insufficient discriminant validity: A comment on Bove, Pervan, Beatty, and Shiu (2009). Journal of Business Research. 2010;63(3):324-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.05.003
  38. Whiteley J, DiBonaventura Md, Wagner JS, Alvir J, Shah S. The impact of menopausal symptoms on quality of life, productivity, and economic outcomes. Journal of Women's Health. 2013;22(11):983-990. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2012.3719
  39. Hildreth KL, Ozemek C, Kohrt WM, Blatchford PJ, Moreau KL. Vascular dysfunction across the stages of the menopausal transition is associated with menopausal symptoms and quality of life. Menopause. 2018;25(9):1011-1019. https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000001112
  40. Yang J, Ren Y, Liu M, Wang Q, Tang S. [Criterion-related validity of the menopause-specific quality of life questionnaire-Chinese version]. Journal of Central South University (Medical Sciences). 2014;39(7):727-732. Chinese.
  41. Kweon YR, Jeon HO. Relationship of fatigue, family function and self-esteem of middle-aged women in menopausal periods. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society. 2012;13(6):2579-2588. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2012.13.6.2579
  42. Henderson VW. Cognitive changes after menopause: Influence of estrogen. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2008;51(3):618-626. https://doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0b013e318180ba10