DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Users of the National Petition to CheongWaDae: Focused on their Motivations

청와대 국민청원 이용자 분석: 활용 동인을 중심으로

  • Kim, Tae-Eun (Graduate School of Hanyang University) ;
  • Mo, Eun-Joung (Policy Development Team of Federation of Middle-Market Enterprises of Korea) ;
  • Yang, Seon-Mo (Public Administration of Graduate School of Hanyang University)
  • Received : 2020.02.04
  • Accepted : 2020.03.13
  • Published : 2020.03.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze people's motivations to use the National Petition service of CheongWaDae, the Presidential Office of Korea. The online space has been used as a testbed of deliberative democracy. In fact, a wide variety of public opinions are being formed and gaining sympathy through the E-Petitions and Daum's Agora. In this regard, President Moon's government launched a petition site to gather public opinions. For any petition agreed on by more than 20,000 people within 30 days, the relevant ministry or the President's office must provide answers or feedback. This study wants to figure out how this National Petition is different from previous platforms like Agora or E-Petitions and why it is so well-received by people. This study uses a mix of both qualitative and quantitative methods. First, we conducted a focus group interview to factorize experiences of using the National Petition into measurable constructs. Second, we did a survey o 156 Koreans who had experienced the National Petition. Results show that symbolism, usefulness, gratification, and trust have positive impact on continuous usage intention. This study argues that symbolism, usefulness, gratification, and trust factors should be in place rather than technical aspects in order to increase the actual participation of users on the online platform of deliberative democracy. In addition, this study is meaningful in that it examined how different the CheongWaDae's National Petition is from the existing platforms for collecting public opinions and analyzed factors that encourage continuous use.

본 연구는 국민들의 청와대 국민청원 활용 동인을 분석하는 것에 목적이 있다. 온라인 공간은 숙의민주주의 구현의 실험장으로 활용되어 왔다. 국민 신문고, 다음 아고라 등에서 다양한 여론이 형성되어 실제 국민들의 공감을 얻기도 했다. 문재인 정부 청와대는 국민들의 여론을 수렴하기 위한 방안으로 국민청원 사이트를 개설했다. 30일 동안 20만 명 이상 동의를 얻은 청원에 대해서 부처의 책임자 혹은 청와대 관계자가 직접 답변을 하는 방식으로 운영된다. 본 연구는 청와대 국민청원이 기존 여론 수렴 플랫폼과 어떤 차별성을 가지는지, 왜 국민들이 청와대 국민청원 서비스에 열광하는지 깊이 살펴보고자 한다. 이를 위해 본 연구는 혼합연구 방식을 도입하여 질적, 양적 분석을 수행했다. 먼저 표적 집단 면접을 통해서 청와대 국민청원 이용경험이 있는 사람들을 대상으로 경험을 측정 가능한 구성개념으로 요인화 했다. 그 다음 청와대 국민청원 이용 경험이 있는 우리나라 국민 156명을 대상으로 설문 조사를 실시했다. 분석결과 상징성, 유용성, 충족성, 신뢰 요인이 국민청원 활용 의도에 정(+)의 영향을 미침을 것을 확인하였다. 본 연구는 온라인의 숙의민주주의 플랫폼에서 이용자들의 실제 참여를 제고하기 위해서 기술적 측면 보다는 상징성, 유용성, 충족성, 신뢰 요인이 마련될 수 있어야 함을 주장하고자 한다. 더불어서 본 연구는 온라인 숙의민주주의 구현 과정으로 청와대 국민청원이 기존 여론 수렴 플랫폼과 어떠한 차별성이 있는지 살펴보고, 지속 이용에 영향을 미치는 요인들을 분석했다는 점에서 의의를 가진다고 할 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bagozzi, R. & Yi, Y. (1988). "On the evaluation of structural equation models." Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). "Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change." Psychological review, 84(2), 191. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  3. Blumler, J. (1979). "The role of theory in uses and gratifications studies." Communication research, 6(1), 9-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365027900600102
  4. Bradley, G. (1974). "Gratifications of television viewing and their correlates for British children." The Uses of Mass Communications Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research, 71-925.
  5. Campbell, A., Gurin, G. & Miller, W. (1954). The voter decides. California: Praeger.
  6. Cohen, J. (1989). Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  7. Conway, M. (2000). Political participation in the United States. Cq Pr.
  8. Cho, H. & Hong, I. (2010). "The Impact of Consumer Characteristics Upon Trust and Purchase Intentions in B2C E-marketplaces." Information Systems Review, 12(3), 49-73.
  9. Cho, Y. & Jeong, Y. (2019). "An Empirical Study on Intention of the Sharing Economy Services." The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 19(3), 183-196. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2019.19.03.183
  10. Choi, J. (2012). "The Influence of SNS Use on Political Efficacy and Political Participation Among Korean College Students." Journal of Political Communication, 27, 369-408.
  11. Choi, S. & Kwon, Y. (2012). "A Study of The Effects of Consumption Experiences on Brand Trust, Consumer Satisfaction, and Repurchase Intention : Focus on The Starbucks Coffee Shop." Journal of Tourism and Leisure Research, 24(4), 357-377.
  12. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). "User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models." Management science, 35(8), 982-1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  13. Deutsch, K. W. (1955). "Symbols of political community. Symbols and Society." Symbols and Society, 23-54.
  14. Elder, C. D. & Cobb, R. W. (1983). The political uses of symbols. London: Longman Publishing Group.
  15. Fischbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: AddisonWesley.
  16. Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). "Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics." Journal of marketing research, 382-388.
  17. Heary, Eilis (2002). "The use of focus group interviews in pediatric health care research." Journal of pediatric psychology, 27(1), 47-57. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/27.1.47
  18. Held, D. (2006). Models of democracy. Stanford University Press, Trans. C. Park. (2010) Seoul: Humanitas Book.
  19. Heo, J. & Park, S. (2014). "Study on the Interactivities of Digital Signage Users in the perspective of Uses and Gratification." Design Convergence Study, 13(1), 99-108.
  20. Hoffman, D. L. & Novak, T. P. (1996). "Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations." Journal of marketing, 60(3), 50-68. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251841
  21. Hong, S. (2008). "A Study on Ukrainian Political Symbolism." The Journal of Slavic Studies, 23(3), 475-502.
  22. Hong, S. (2011). "Theoretical complementation of deliberative democracy : With focus on republican-oriented alternative." Media Society, 19(2), 475-502.
  23. Hong, W. (2014). "Reexamination of the Internet Public Sphere : Communication and Universal Pragmatism." Media Society, 10(4), 263-300.
  24. Jang, Y. & Lee, E. (2010). "How Does Message Quality and Opinion Extremity Moderate the Effects of Exposure to Disagreement in Online Discussion?" Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 54(6), 422-443.
  25. Jeon, B. & Kim, H. (2017). "An Exploratory Study on the Sharing and Application of Public Open Big Data." Informatization Policy, 24(3), 27-41. https://doi.org/10.22693/NIAIP.2017.24.3.027
  26. Jeong, B. & Seong, J. (2005). "Science and Technology and Symbolic Politics." Korean Association For Policy Science, 9(1), 27-48.
  27. Jeong, H. (2019). "An Exploratory Study of Collective E-Petitions Estimation Methodology Using Anomaly Detection: Focusing on the Voice of Citizens of Changwon City." Informatization Policy, 26(4), 85-106. https://doi.org/10.22693/NIAIP.2019.26.4.085
  28. Jeong I. & Kim, J. (1998). "Re-conceptulization of U.S. Information Policies." The Korea Association for Policy Studies, 7(2), 33-59.
  29. Jung, B. & Seong, J. (2005). "S&T and Symbol Politios." Korean Policy Sciences Review, 9(1), 27-48.
  30. Kang, S., Lee, D. & Kim, H. (2008). "A Study on the Effect of an e-Learning Lecture System's Quality on a Learner's Flow and Participation." The Journal of internet electronic commerce research, 8(3), 211-237.
  31. Katz, E., Haas, H. & Gurevitch, M. (1973). "On the use of the mass media for important things." American sociological review, 164-181.
  32. Kim, C. (2019). "Development and Validation of the Social Interest Inventory based on the Individual Psychology." Korea Journal of Counseling, 20(1), 39-65. https://doi.org/10.15703/kjc.20.1.201902.39
  33. Kim, C., Kim, E. & Jun, J. (2004). "Relationships between Service Recovery Fairness, Trust, and Behavioral Intention among Family Restaurant Customers." Journal of Tourism and Leisure Research, 16(3), 267-286.
  34. Kim, D. (2011). "A Study on Factors Affecting Social Network Service e-Service Quality." Journal of digital convergence, 9(3), 225-233. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2011.9.3.225
  35. Kim, J. (2005). "Differentiation of Cyber Public Sphere and Conditions for Deliberative Democracy." Korean Journal of Sociology, 39(2), 34-68.
  36. Kim, N. & Kim, M. (2010). "The Effects of Wordof- Mouth Information Quality on Wordof- Mouth Effects in Online Tourism Context." Korean Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 19(4), 59-79.
  37. Kim, S., Kim, D. & Park J. (2009). "Establishing the Concept of Cheng and Developing Its Scales in a Commercial Relationship." Korean Journal of Marketing, 24(3), 119-148.
  38. Kim, T. & Choi, J. (2019). "The Effect of Perceived Personalization of Driving Style of Autonomous Vehicle on User's Trust and Intention to Use." The Journal of Digital Contents Society, 20(3), 586-596.
  39. Kim, T. & Choi, S. (2019). "A Study on the Effect of Personal Recognition of Best Comment on Emotion Contagion on Online: Focused on Crypto-currency phenomenon of Korea." Legislation and Policy Studies, 11(1), 335-364.
  40. Kim, Y. (2010). "Confidence Indicators and Evaluation Factors of Credibility According to the Types of Online Information." Journal of the Korean society for information management, 27(1), 7-24. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.1.007
  41. Kingdon, J. & Thurber, J. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston: Little, Brown.
  42. Kotler, P. & Gertner, D. (2002). "Country as brand, product, and beyond: A place marketing and brand management perspective." Journal of brand management, 9(4), 249-261. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540076
  43. Ku, D. (2013). Research Methodology. Gyeonggi: Hakhyunsa.
  44. Ku, G. (2014). "A study of the impact of the types of political efficacy on media based political information seeking and voting intention." Journal of Political Communication. 33, 5-25.
  45. Ku, J. (2000.) "Social and Cultural Symbolism of Brand." Journal of the Korean Society of Design Culture, 6(1), 1-15.
  46. Kuem, H. & Joo, J. (2013). "Study on Impact of Technology Readiness Index and Political Psychology Variables of Voters on Mobile Voting Intention : Focus on Comparison of Voters of Different Generations. Cyber." Journal of Cybercommunication Academic Society, 30(4), 169-217.
  47. Lasswell, H., Miriam, C. & Smith, T. (1950). A Study of Power: World Politics and Personal Insecurity. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
  48. Lee, C. & Hyun K. (2007). "Effects of Voters' Media Use on their Political Knowledge, Political Efficacy, and Political Disaffection." Journal of Communication Science, 7(4), 112-142.
  49. Lee, H. & Lim, J. (2015). A Structural Model and AMOS 22. Seoul: Jyphyunjae.
  50. Lee, J. & Kim, E. (2006). "Effects of Online Deliberation on Political Discussion Efficacy." Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 50(3), 393-423.
  51. Lee, J. & Kim, Y. (2012). "The Relationship Between Professional Baseball Spectators' Experiential Consumption, Consumption Emotion, Customer Satisfaction, Trust, Attitude toward Team and Revisit Intention." Journal of Sport and Leisure Studies, 47(1), 265-280. https://doi.org/10.51979/KSSLS.2012.02.47.265
  52. Lee, J., Kang, H. & Park, J. (2010). "The Determinants of Reuse Intention in e-Learning An Integrated Approach to Attitude and Flow." The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 10(3), 472-479. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2010.10.3.472
  53. Lee, Y. (1995). "'Information Superhighway' and the Change of production System in U.S." Regional Reserach, 4(3), 83-110.
  54. Lechner, U. & Schmid, B. F. (2000). Communities and media-towards a reconstruction of communities on media. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 10-19). IEEE.
  55. McQuail, D. & Windahl, S. (1981). Communication Model for the Study of Mass Communication. New York: Longman.
  56. Moon, C. (2009). "The Study on the Political Symbols of 'Lee Myung-bak Administration' Policies including Government's PR factors - Analyzed focusing on major domestic paper's editorials." Journal of Political Communication, 15, 147-186. https://doi.org/10.35731/kpca.2009..15.004
  57. Moon, J. & Kim, Y. (2001). "Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context." Information & management, 38(4), 217-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00061-6
  58. Morgan, R. M. & Hunt, S. D. (1994). "The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing." Journal of Marketing. 58(3), 20-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800202
  59. Morrell, M. E. (2005). "Deliberation, democratic decision-making and internal political efficacy." Political Behavior, 27(1), 49-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-005-3076-7
  60. Noh, J., Ched, A. & Seo, J. (2019). "Factors Influencing Social Media Use in Local Government." Informatization Policy, 26(3), 36-52. https://doi.org/10.22693/niaip.2019.26.3.036
  61. Palmgreen, P. & Rayburn, J. (1984). "Merging uses and gratifications and expectancyvalue theory." Communication Research. 11(4), 537-562. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365084011004005
  62. Parasuraman, A. & Colby, C. L. (2015). "An updated and streamlined technology readiness index: TRI 2.0." Journal of service research, 18(1), 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670514539730
  63. Park, S. & Kim, H. (2007). "Evaluation of Electronic Government at Waseda University in Japan." e-Government Focus, 2, National IT Industry Promotion Agency.
  64. Park. S., Kim, J. & Jang, H. (2012). "An Empirical Study of a Social Network Service(SNS) Task-Media Fit and Performance in Political Field." Journal of Political Science and Communication, 15(2), 233-267.
  65. Pfeffer, J. (1981). "Management as symbolic action: the creation and maintenance of organizational paradigm." Research in organizational behavior, 3, 1-52.
  66. Pinkleton, B. E., Austin, E. W. & Fortman, K. K. (1998). "Relationships of media use and political disaffection to political efficacy and voting behavior." Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42(1), 34-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159809364433
  67. Richardson, W. (2003). "Connecting political discussion to civic engagement: The role of civic knowledge, efficacy and context for adolescents." Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland.
  68. Rogers, E. (1995). "Diffusion of Innovations: modifications of a model for telecommunications." In Die diffusion von innovationen in der telekommunikation, 25-38. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  69. Ryu, M. & Lee, Y. (2019). "Study on Use Intention of Chinese Unmanned Convenience Stores by Applying UTAUT and Theory of Experience Economy: Verifying the Moderating Effect of Reliability." Journal of Distribution and Management Research, 22(2), 5-15. https://doi.org/10.17961/jdmr.22.2.201904.5
  70. Seo, W.. Won, W. & Hong, J. (2010). "An Empirical Study on the Effects of SNS Website Quality Factors on the User Satisfaction, Intention of Continuous Use, and Intention of Wordsof-Mouth." The Journal of Business and Economics, 26(1), 99-132.
  71. Shin, E. & Cho, W. (2019). "The effects of Wordof-mouth information and characteristics of social commerce hotel products on the customer's satisfaction, trust and use intention." International Journal of Tourism Management and Sciences, 34(2), 217-236. https://doi.org/10.21719/IJTMS.34.2.11
  72. Simon, P. (2013). Too big to ignore: the business case for big data (Vol. 72). John Wiley & Sons.
  73. Song, H. & Ko. K. (2013). "The Quality of Social Network Service(SNS), Political Efficacy and the Acceleration of the Political Participation." The Korean Political Science Association, 12(1), 175-216.
  74. Song, J. & Park, S. (2006). "A Study of the Impact of Media Importance, Political Involvement, Political Efficacy and Political Cynicism on the Voting Behavior." Korean Journal of Broadcasting and Telecommunication Studies, 20(3), 166-197.
  75. Tsai, S. (2005). "Utility, cultural symbolism and emotion: a comprehensive model of brand purchase value." International Journal of Research in Marketing, 22(3), 277-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2004.11.002
  76. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. & Xu, X. (2012). "Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology." MIS quarterly, 157-178.
  77. White, L. & Sintov, N. (2017). "You are what you drive: Environmentalist and social innovator symbolism drives electric vehicle adoption intentions." Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 99, 94-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.03.008
  78. Wixom, B. & Todd, P. (2005). "A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance." Information systems research, 16(1), 85-102. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1050.0042
  79. Yang, G. & Park, T. (2007), "Effect of the Participation of Doctors and Pharmacists in the Policy Process on the Trust in the Ministry of Health & Welfare in Korea." Korean Public Administration Review, 41(4), 357-385.
  80. You, J. & Park, C. (2009), "A Study on Chinese Consumer's the Acceptance Factors of Mobile Shopping Service." The Journal of internet electronic commerce research, 9(2), 81-106.