DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Impact of Representative SCS-CN on Simulated Rainfall Runoff

SCS-CN 대표 매개변수가 분포형과 집중형 강우-유출 모형에서 유출 손실에 미치는 영향 비교

  • Received : 2019.07.31
  • Accepted : 2019.09.03
  • Published : 2020.01.31

Abstract

The determination of soil parameters is important in predicting the simulated surface runoff using either a distributed or a lumped rainfall-runoff model. Soil characteristics can be collected using remote sensing techniques and represented as a digital map. There is no universal agreement with respect to the determination of a representative parameter from a gridded digital map. Two representative methods, i.e., arithmetic and predominant, are introduced and applied to both FLO-2D and HEC-HMS to improve the model's accuracy. Both methods are implemented in the Yongdam catchment, and the results show that the former seems to be more accurate than the latter in the test site. This is attributed to the high conductivity of the dominant soil class, which is A type.

Keywords

References

  1. Hopmans, J. H., Simunek, J., 1999, Review of inverse estimation of soil hydraulic properties, in: van Genuchten, M. T., Leij, F. J., Wu, L., (Eds), Characterization and Measurement of the Hydraulic Properties of Unsaturated Porous Medis, University of California, Riverside, CA., 643-659.
  2. Huffman, R., Fangmeier, D., Elliot, W., Workman, S., Schwab, G., 2011, Infiltration and Runoff, Soil and Water Conservation Engineering, 81-111.
  3. Hydrologic Engineering Center, 2014, HEC-RAS River Analysis System, Hydraulic Reference Manaual, CPD-69. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center, 609 Second Street, Davis, CA.
  4. Hydrologic Engineering Center, 2014, HEC-RAS River Analysis System, User's Manual, CPD-68. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center, 609 Second Street, Davis, CA.
  5. Jensen, M. E., 1995, Irrigated agriculture at the crossroads, In: Pereira, L. S., Feddes, R. A., Gilley, J. R., Lesaffre, B., (Eds.), Sustainability of Irrigated Agriculture, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 19-33.
  6. Johnson, M. S., Coon, W. F., Mehta, V. K., Steenhuis, T. S., Brooks, E. S., Boll, J., 2003, Application of two hydrologic models with different runoff mechanisms to a hillslope dominated watershed in the northeastern US: a comparison of HSPF and SMR, Journal of Hydrology, 284, 57-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.07.005
  7. Kabat, P., Hutjes, R. W. A., Feddes, R. A., 1997, The scaling characteristics of soil parameters: from plot scale heterogeneity to subgrid parameterization, J. Hydrol., 190: 363-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03134-4
  8. Kokkonen, T., Koivusalo, H., Karvonen, T., 2001, A Semi-distributed approach to rainfallrunoff modelling-a case study in a snow affected catchment, Environmental Modelling & Software, 16, 481-493. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00028-7
  9. K-water Institute, 2013, Yongdam experimental catchment manage white book, KIWE-WRRC-14-01, Daejeon, S.Korea.
  10. Maidment, D. R., 1993, Handbook of hydrology, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  11. Singh, V. P., 1995, Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology Highlands Ranch, CO: Water Resources Publications.
  12. Vaze, J., Jordan, P., Beecham, R., Frost, A., Summerell, G., 2012, Guidelines for RainfallRunoff Modelling: Towards best practice model application, 47.
  13. Yang, W. Y., Li, D., Sun, T., Ni, G. H., 2015, Saturation-excess and infiltration-excess runoff on green roofs, Ecological Engineering, 74, 327-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.10.023