Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design (대한건축학회논문집:계획계)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Synchronic and Diachronic Comparative Analysis of Architectural Design Professionalism with Medical Professionalism in Korea - Focused on Doctor in Medical Field and Architect in Architectural Design Field -

한국 의료분야와 건축설계분야 전문가주의에 대한 공시적, 통시적 비교 분석 - 의료분야 의사와 건축설계분야 건축사를 중심으로 -

  • Received : 2019.12.16
  • Accepted : 2020.03.06
  • Published : 2020.03.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare between professionalism in medical field(doctor) and architectural design field(architect) in Korea through synchronic and diachronic analysis, with basic requirement of expertise and systemicity, attitude requirement of the publicness, and structural requirement of exclusiveness and autonomy. The medical professionalism adapted by Korean government in the early period of modernization evolved from Western's professional expertise is highly divided as economy grew and society changed. In comparison, architecture was divided into architecture, urbanism, landscape, and interior architecture. Additionally, architectural field was subdivided with architectural design, engineering, construction, structure, and facilities, but architectural design focused on generalized education and practice system. From the systematical point of view, architectural design field has changed profoundly from architectural engineering as 5 year undergraduate educational system was introduced with Korean architectural accreditation. The publicness is approved through health service in medical field and safety and the public domain in architectural design field, but in reality the professionals are viewed as economic interest groups. Hence, the professionalism in both fields is required to reinforce ideology and ethics, and to practice concrete measures for publicness. Compared with the unified organization of medical field, architectural design professionalism faces various difficulties in unifying the organization, such as internal competition caused by tightened architect's requirements, along with external problems from architectural design permission demands of construction companies. In medical and architectural design professionalism, with the appearance of consumerism and stricter governmental regulations, the autonomy is weakened. From the result of comparative analysis, Korean medical field became extremely subdivided and specialized in each department, therefore integration of each disease and establishment of centers are proposed as solutions. By contrast, the reinforcement of expertise in architectural design professionalism might be necessary to strengthen autonomy caused by governmental restriction, and to form architectural culture and secure public architecture.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 연구는 2019년 본인 박사 논문 자료 중 일부를 활용하였고, 자료정리를 도와준 충북대 김재섭에게 감사드린다.

References

  1. Carr-Saunders, A.M., & Wilson. P.A. 1964(1933). The Emergence of Professions, Frank Cass, London.
  2. Choi, T.S. (2006). A Study on the Professionalization of the Architectural Practice, Ph.D Thesis, Dongkuk University.
  3. Cockerham. W.C. (1992). Medical Sociology (5thEd), Prentice-HallInc., New Jersey.
  4. Cuff, D. (1992). Architecture: The Story of a Practice, MIT Press, Cambridge.
  5. Freidson, E. (1994). Professionalism Reborn: Theory, Prophecy, and Policy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  6. Goode, W. (1960). Encroachment, Charlatanism and Emerging Profession: Psychiatry, Sociology and Medicine, American Sociological Review 25, 902-965.
  7. Greenwood, E. (1957). The Attributes of a Profession, Social Work, 2(3), 45-55.
  8. Hall, R.H. (1968). Professionalism and Bureaucratization, American Sociological Review, 33(1), 92-104. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092242
  9. Jeong, T.J., & Choi, J.P. (2019). A Study on the Deriving Factors of Professionalism for the Analysis of Architectural Professionalism in Korea, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design 35(9), 49-55. https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_PD.2019.35.9.49
  10. Kim, H.S., & Kim, M.S. (2003). A Status and Task on the System for Professional License, Korea Research Institute for Vocational Education and Training.
  11. Kim, M.J. (2006). Changing Department-based Care Organizations to Disease & Organ-based Care Centers : A Case Study on Care Centers in the United States & Korea, MS Thesis, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology.
  12. Ko, Y.S., Kim, D.E., Yoon, K.S., Lee, S.W., & Jung, W.G. (2009). A Study on Improvement Plan for Specialist Qualifying System, Korea Development Institute.
  13. Kwon, H.J., Lee, Y.H., & Ahn, D.S. (2012). The Concept and Development Direction of Medical Professionalism, Korean Medical Education Review 14(1), 7-10. https://doi.org/10.17496/KMER.2012.14.1.007
  14. Lee, H.G. (2006). A Study on the Professional Project of Korean Medical Doctors, Ph.D Thesis, Korea University.
  15. Lee, K.M., & Seong, E.Y. (2015). On Institutional Formation of Appellation and Profession of the Korean Architect, Architecture & Urban Research Institute.
  16. Macdonald, K.M. (1995). The Sociology of the Professions, Sage Publications Ltd, London.
  17. Ministry of Construction & Transportation. (2000). A Study on Improvement Plan for Architect License System, Ministry of Construction & Transportation.
  18. Oh, H.S. (2006). A Study on the Process of Expertise Development and Key Factors, Korea Research Institute for Vocational Education & Training 9(2), 193-216.
  19. Oh, H.S., & Kim, J.A. (2007). The Critical Issues and Suggestion in Expertise Research, Vocational Education & Research 9(1), 143-168.
  20. Registered Architect. (1995). 30 Years History of Korea Architect, Korea Institute of Registered Architect.
  21. Song, Y. (1995). Institution and Ideology-Architecture after Liberation, Journal of Architectural History 2(8), 122-129
  22. http://www.kira.or.kr/jsp/main/06/04.jsp