문화기술의 융합 (The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology)

  • 제5권4호
  • /
  • Pages.289-294
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2384-0358(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-0366(eISSN)
국제문화기술진흥원 (The International Promotion Agency of Culture Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

온라인상 저작권 보호에 관한 그림자규제와 시사점

Shadow Regulation of Online Copyright Protection and Its Implications

  • 김호 (계명대학교 사회과학대학 국제통상학전공)
  • Kim, Ho (Major in International Commerce, Keimyung Univ)
  • 투고 : 2019.09.30
  • 심사 : 2019.11.06
  • 발행 : 2019.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

규제는 법률에 근거하여 시행됨이 원칙이나 그렇지 않은 경우도 많고, 이렇게 법적 구속력은 없으나 규제기능을 하는 그림자규제는 정부 뿐만 아니라 민간에 의해서도 시행될 수 있다. 본고는 인터넷상 저작권보호에 관한 미국, EU 및 영국의 그림자규제에 대해 살펴보고 우리에 대한 시사점을 도출하였다. 자율규제의 경우 저작권 침해행위를 가려내기 위한 필터링 기술 확보 및 적용을 위한 기술적, 재정적 문제 해결, 필터링 과정에서 합법적인 표현의 자유를 침해할 가능성 차단, 저작권 침해 의심행위에 대해 부과되는 제재조치의 적절성 보장, 인터넷 업계와 저작권자간 협의과정에 인터넷 사용자의 참여 또는 감시 보장, 정부의 역할 및 책임 명확화 등을 고려해야 할 것이다.

Although regulation generally shall be based on the law, many regulations are not based on legislation. Shadow regulation that is not mandatory but functions as regulation may be developed and enforced by non-govermental body. This article examines shadow regulations of copyright protection online of the US, the EU and the UK and draws their implications for Korea. In case of self-regulation, the following factors shall be considered: to acquire the technology to filter copyright infringement and to solve the problems arising from the application of it, to prevent the infringement of freedom of expression, to ensure the appropriateness of the sanctions imposed on the alleged copyright infringement, to ensure the participation or monitoring of internet subscribers in the negotiation between the internet industry and copyright holders, and to clarify the government's role and responsibility.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. B. S. Choi, "Reclassifying Regulatory Instruments and Options," Korean Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 47, No. 2, p. 2, June 2009.
  2. APEC, and OECD, APEC-OECD Integrated Checklist on Regulatory Reform, APEC and OECD, p. 7, 2005.
  3. Y. S. Choi, Study on the Actual Utilization of Alternative Regulatory Strategies in Korea, Korea Institute of Public Administration, p. 2, 2013.
  4. S. Kim, and J. S. Choi, “Comparative Research on Quasi-regulation among Australia, US and Korea,” Journal of Regulation Studies, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 6-10, December 2017.
  5. Australian Law Reform Commission, Classification-Content Regulation and Convergent Media. Australian Government, pp. 304-305, February 2012.
  6. Commonwealth Interdepartmental Committee on Quasiregulation., Grey-Letter Law, Australian Government, pp. 1-10, December 1997.
  7. Electronic Frontier Foundation, Shadow Regulation. https://www.eff.org/ko/taxonomy/term/11403.
  8. B. Sisario, "To Slow Piracy, Internet Providers Ready Penalties," The New York Times, July 7, 2011. https://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/08/technology/to-slow-piracy-internet-providers-ready-penalties.html?_r=0.
  9. V. Espinel, "Working Together to Stop Internet Piracy," The White House, July 7, 2011. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2011/07/07/working-together-stop-internet-piracy.
  10. C. Farivar, "Federal court: Obama admin doesn't need to release more 'six strikes' documents," Ars Technica, March 29, 2013. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/03/federal-court-obama-admin-doesnt-need-to-release-more-six-strikes-documents/.
  11. E. Van der Sar, "Joe Biden Pushed For 'Six Strikes' Anti-Piracy Plan, IFPI Says," TorrentFreak, April 8, 2013. http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=43453.
  12. T. Klosowski, "The Copyright Alert System: How the New 'Six Strikes' Anti-Piracy Program Works," lifehacker, February 26, 2013. https://lifehacker.com/the-copyright-alert-systemhow-the-new-six-strikes-a-5986961.
  13. J. Flint, "Entertainment giants and broadband providers team up on piracy effort," Los Angeles Times, July 7, 2011. https://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/07/entertainment-giants-and-broadband-providers-team-up-on-piracy-effort.html.
  14. C. McSherry, and E. Goldman, "The 'Graduated Response' Deal: What if Users Had Been At the Table?," Electronic Frontier Foundation, July 18, 2011. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/07/graduated-r esponse-deal-what-if-users-had-been.
  15. Electronic Frontier Foundation, The "Six Strikes" Copyright Surveillance Machine. https://www.eff.org/issues/six-strikes-copyright-surveillance-machine.
  16. Electronic Frontier Foundation, The Copyright Alert System FAQ. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/02/six-strikescopyright-alert-system-faq.
  17. M. Stolz, "U.S. Copyright Surveillance Machine About To Be Switched On, Promises of Transparency Already Broken," Electronic Frontier Foundation, November 15, 2012. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/11/us-copyright-surveillance-machine-about-be-switched-on.
  18. C. McSherry, and E. Goldman, "The 'Graduated Response' Deal: What if Users Had Been At the Table?," Electronic Frontier Foundation, July 18, 2011. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/07/graduated-response-deal-what-if-users-had-been.
  19. A. Bridy, “Graduated Response American Style: 'Six Strikes' Measured Against Five Norms,” Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 33-37, January 2013.
  20. Council of the EU, EU adjusts copyright rules to the digital age. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2019/04/15/eu-adjusts-copyright-rules-to-the-digital-age/.
  21. A. Orlowski, "UK's pirate-nagging VCAP scheme WON'T have penalties - report," The Register, May 9, 2014. https://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/05/09/uks_freet ardnagging_vcap_wont_have_penalties_report.
  22. LibertyShield.com, Get It Right Initiative - UK ISPs Sent 1 Million Piracy Emails. February 12, 2019. https://www.libertyshield.com/blog/get-it-right-uk-isp-piracy.
  23. GOV.UK, Get It Right from a Genuine Site copyright campaign update. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/get-it-right-from-a-genuine-site-copyright-campaign-update