DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

디지털 사이니지 콘텐츠 소구 유형과 상호작용성이 태도와 기억에 미치는 효과

The Effect of Digital Signage Content Appeal Type and Interactivity on Attitude and Memory

  • 임재문 (광주대학교 사진영상드론학과)
  • Lim, Jae-Moon (Dept of Photography, Image and Drone, Gwangju University)
  • 투고 : 2019.10.01
  • 심사 : 2019.11.20
  • 발행 : 2019.11.28

초록

본 연구는 디지털 사이니지의 광고 소구 유형(정보소구 vs. 이미지 소구)과 상호작용성(저 vs. 고)에 따라 콘텐츠 태도와 회상에 미치는 효과를 실험을 통해 실증적으로 분석하였다. 디지털 사이니지가 공공 장소에 다양하게 설치되고 있으나 카메라, 화면 터치, 스마트폰 연계, 전송 기능 등 상호작용성 수준을 과도하게 높여 지속적인 커뮤니케이션 효과를 유지하지 못하고 있으며, 광고 소구에 대한 전략적 접근이 없이 무분별하게 이루어지고 있는 상황이다. 연구 결과 첫째, 디지털 사이니지의 상호작용성 수준이 극단적으로 높은 경우보다 적절히 낮은 상호작용성 수준이 콘텐츠 태도와 회상에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 적절히 낮은 상호작용성 수준의 경우 정보소구의 광고가 이미지 소구의 광고보다 콘텐츠 태도와 회상이 높게 나타났다. 둘째, 디지털 사이니지의 상호작용성 수준이 높은 경우 이미지 소구의 콘텐츠가 태도에 긍정적인 영향을 미치며, 회상에서는 이미지 소구 광고와 정보 소구 광고 모두 부정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 디지털 사이니지의 상호작용성 수준이 낮은 경우 정보소구의 콘텐츠 태도와 회상에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 이에 본 연구 결과는 디지털 사이니지의 콘텐츠 제작에 대한 전략을 수립하는데 기여할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

The study empirically analyzed the effects of content attitudes and recall on digital signage advertising appeal (information appeal vs. image appeal) and interactivity level (low vs. high). As a result, first, it was found that a moderately low level of interactivity had a positive effect on content attitudes and recall than when the level of digital signage was extremely high. In addition, at moderately low levels of interactivity, information appeals had higher content attitudes and recalls than image appeals. Second, the content of image appeal has a positive effect on attitude when the digital signage level of interactivity is high, and the image recall ad and information appeal ad have negative effects on recall. Third, the low level of interactivity of digital signage has a positive effect on the content attitude and recall of information appeal. With the advent of digital media in recent years, concerns about how to construct the level of interactivity and information content on a strategic level are increasing in practice. The results of this study are expected to suggest the direction of the strategic grounds for this.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. K. S. Han. (2013). Influence of Brand Experience by Digital Signage Advertising Types on Engagement, ADVERTISING RESEARCH, 98, 43-84.
  2. J. Y. Cho. (2019). A Study of the Effectiveness of Digital Signage : Importance of Customized Content, Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(6), 211-217. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2019.17.6.211
  3. Andrew Newman, Charles Dennis, Len-Tiu Wright, Tamira King. (2010). Shoppers' Experiences of Digital Signage-a Cross-National Qualitative Study, JDCTA, 4(7), 50-57.
  4. C. W. Kim & K. D. Park. (2010). Future Directions on the Next Generation of Digital Signage. Journal of the Korean academic, 4(1), 51-61.
  5. I. Nakamura. (2010). Digital Signage Revolution, Seoul : Communication Books.
  6. S. J. MacMillan & J. S. Hwang. (2003). Measures of perceived interactivity: An exploration of the role of direction of communication, user control, and time in shaping perceptions of interactivity, Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 29-42.
  7. J. Jee & J. S. Hwang. (2002). Measures of perceived interactivity: An exploration of the role of direction of communication, user control, and time in shaping perceptions of interactivity, Journal of Interactivity Advertising, 31(3), 29-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2002.10673674
  8. W. J. Choi. (2000). The Effective Process of Internet Advertising Based on the Interactivity of Websites, ADVERTISING RESEARCH, 47, 62-89.
  9. J. S. Hwang, E. H. Kim & J. S. Cho. (2006). The Perceived Interactivity (PI), Internet Usage Motivation, and Involvement as the Factors Affecting on the Attitude toward the Website. The Korean journal of advertising and public relations, 8(1), 159-186.
  10. I. G. Shin & S. W. Shim. (2011). The Study on Interactive Outdoor Advertising Acceptance Digital Signage Stikus Wall Case. The Korean journal of advertising and public relations, 13(4), 390-432.
  11. K. S. Han & I. K. Lee. (2013) Impact of advertising Aappeal type and interactivity level of digital signage on attitude toward advertising and sharing intention. Journal of Convergence Information Technology, 8(16), 63-69.
  12. S. Y. Yu & E. H. Kim. (2005). The Effects on Message Sourses, Model recognition and Appeal Type in Advertising of Medical Advertisement, The Korean Journal of Consumer and Advertising Psychology, 6(3), 41-59.
  13. G. W. Hartman. (1936) A field experiment on the comparative effectiveness of emotional and rational political leaflets in determining election results, Journal of Abmormal & Social Psychology, vol. 31, 99-114. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0056079
  14. C. P. Puto & W. D. Wells. (1984). Informational and Transformational Advertising: the Differential Effects of Time. Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 638-643.
  15. R. Batra & M. L. Ray. (1986). Affective Responses Mediating Acceptance of Advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(2), 234-249. https://doi.org/10.1086/209063
  16. C. Chang. (2007). Diagnostic Advertising Content and Individual Differences: Testing a Resource-Matching Perspective with a Taiwanese Sample. The Journal of Advertising, 36(3), 75-84. https://doi.org/10.2753/joa0091-3367360305
  17. S. W. Shim, H. M. Byun & U. H. Kim. (2011). The Impact of Audiences' Propensity and Motivation of Media Uses on Attitudes toward Mobile News Contents. Cultural Economics Study, 14(2), 75-98.