DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Simulative Study of Effects of LM Microorganism on Environment: Analyses of Metabolomes and Soil Microbial Communities

LM 미생물의 환경영향 모사: 대사체와 토양미생물군 분석

  • Lee, Ji-Hoon (Department of Bioenvironmental Chemistry, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Ki, Min-Gyu (Department of Bioenvironmental Chemistry, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Chonbuk National University)
  • 이지훈 (전북대학교 농업생명과학대학 생물환경화학과) ;
  • 기민규 (전북대학교 농업생명과학대학 생물환경화학과)
  • Received : 2019.06.28
  • Accepted : 2019.08.14
  • Published : 2019.09.30

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Living modified microorganisms (LMMs) have been focused in two very different aspects of positive and negative effects on ecology and human health. As a model experiment, wild type and a foreign origin gene-harboring modified E. coli strains were subjected to comparison of their metabolomes and potential effects on soil microbiota in the laboratory sets. This study assumes the unintentional release of LMMs and tries to suggest potential effects on the soil microbiota even at minimal settings. METHODS AND RESULTS: Metabolomes from the wild type and LM E. coli were analyzed by NMR and the profiles were compared. In the laboratory soil experiments, the two types of E. coli were added to the soils and monitored for the bacterial community compositions. Those metabolomic profiles did not show significant differences. The microbial community structures from the time series soil DNAs for both the sets using wild type and LMO also did not indicate significant changes, but minor by the addition of foreign organisms regardless of wild or LMO. CONCLUSION: Even if the recombinant microorganism (LMO) is released into the soil environment, the survival of microorganisms in the environment would be one of the major factors for the transfers of foreign genes to other organisms and diffusion into the soil environment.

Keywords

References

  1. Buiatti, M., Christou, P., & Pastore, G. (2013). The application of GMOs in agriculture and in food production for a better nutrition: two different scientific points of view. Genes and Nutrition, 8(3), 255-270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12263-012-0316-4
  2. Cases, I., & de Lorenzo, V. (2005). Genetically modified organisms for the environment: stories of success and failure and what we have learned from them. International Microbiology, 8(3), 213-222.
  3. Kozich, J. J., Westcott, S. L., Baxter, N. T., Highlander, S. K., & Schloss, P. D. (2013). Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 79(17), 5112-5120. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01043-13
  4. Lozupone, C., & Knight, R. (2005). UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 71(12), 8228-8235. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.12.8228-8235.2005
  5. Schloss, P. D., Westcott, S. L., Ryabin, T., Hall, J. R., Hartmann, M., Hollister, E. B., Lesniewski, R. A., Oakley, B. B., Parks, D. H., Robinson, C. J., Sahl, J. W., Stres, B., Thallinger, G. G., Van Horn, D. J., & Weber, C. F. (2009). Introducing mothur: Open-source, platformindependent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 75(23), 7537-7541. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01541-09