DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Inflow of Information by Majors Reflecting Car Lifestyle -Focused on User Experience of Design Major and Engineering Major-

자동차 라이프스타일을 반영한 전공별 정보 유입에 관한 연구 -디자인 전공자와 공학 전공자의 사용자 경험을 중심으로-

  • Ahn, Jung-Hyun (Dept. of Smart Design Engineering, International Design School for Advanced Studies, HongIk University) ;
  • Kim, Seung-In (Dept. of Digital Media Design, International Design School for Advanced Studies, HongIk University)
  • 안정현 (홍익대학교 국제디자인전문대학원 스마트디자인엔지니어링 전공) ;
  • 김승인 (홍익대학교 국제디자인전문대학원 디지털미디어디자인 전공)
  • Received : 2019.05.16
  • Accepted : 2019.07.20
  • Published : 2019.07.28

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out latent needs of users through the difference of information inflow between design major and engineering major reflecting car lifestyle and to complement them. Although those two relationship deepens due to the development of industrialization, collaboration is still a difficult situation. To find out lifestyle of between those two majors, experiments were carried out quantitatively by conducting in-depth interviews and additionally survey were conducted concurrently. The results showd clearly difference in meaning and value of the automobile. This phenomenon is related to identity. The designers expressed themselves by car, and others differed by using their cars as a means of mobility.

이 연구는 자동차 라이프 스타일을 반영하여 디자인 전공자와 공학전공자의 유입된 정보의 차이를 통하여 사용자의 숨겨진 니즈를 발견하고 이를 보완하기 위한 연구이다. 산업화의 발달로 인하여 디자인과 공학의 상관관계가 깊어지는 시점이지만 여전히 협업에 어려움을 겪고 있는 실상이다. 두 전공자의 라이프스타일을 알아보기 위한 실험은 개인 심층 인터뷰를 진행함으로 양적 조사를 하였고 부가적으로 설문조사를 동시 진행하였다. 그 결과 자동차의 의미와 가치에서 두드러진 차이가 있었다. 이러한 현상은 정체성과 연관이 되어 나타나는데 디자이너는 자동차로 자신을 다소 표현하였고, 공학도는 이동 수단으로서 자동차를 사용함으로 차이가 났다.

Keywords

OHHGBW_2019_v10n7_163_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Average value and standard deviation of survey results

Table 1. Core meaning of design by Cooper and Press

OHHGBW_2019_v10n7_163_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Interview Participants

OHHGBW_2019_v10n7_163_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. The quantitative survey result

OHHGBW_2019_v10n7_163_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Interview summary of the subjects

OHHGBW_2019_v10n7_163_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. hypothesis and Result of research

OHHGBW_2019_v10n7_163_t0005.png 이미지

References

  1. H. J. Yim. (2014). A Case Study of International Design-Engineering Collaborative Design Project Course. Engineering Education Information Center, 17(2), 59-67.
  2. Y. E. Kim. (2017). A Study of Contemporary Design Education Paradigm. Doctoral thesis. Kookmin University, Seoul.
  3. J. Dyson. (2019). Who we are. DysonUS[Online]. https://careers.dyson.com/en-gb/who-we-are/
  4. H. J. Yim.. (2017). Convergence Education in Mechanical Engineering and Industrial Design. Journal of the KSME, 57(4), 36-40. http://www.dbpia.co.kr/journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE07133845
  5. H. S. Lee, K. H. Ryu, S. A. Jeon & Y. H. Kang. (2018). A Study on Methods of Collaboration with Engineers For Leisure Boat Design. Journal of Navigation and Port Research, 42(4), 267-276. DOI : 10.5394/KINPR.2018.42.4.267
  6. Hyunday. (2019). Introduction to Design Job. http://recruit.hyundai.com/hfront/design/recuStory.do?cmd=00001&sort=4
  7. Y. J. Chang. (2011). The Study on the Ambiguity of Design Management and its Meaning-Structure. Journal of Digital Design, 11(4), 369-378. https://doi.org/10.17280/jdd.2011.11.4.036
  8. K. H. Han. (2018). Research Methodology for Korean Engineers. Journal of Science and Technology Studies, 18(2), 181-232.
  9. J. H. Kim, K. J. Kim & J. Y. Sohn. (2005). A Fundamental Study on Design Education for Engineer. Journal of the KSDS Conference Proceeding, 252-253. http://www.dbpia.co.kr/journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE00900603
  10. H. J. Park. (2005). A Study of the expression strategy of newspaper ad according to consumer's life style. Master thesis. Hongik University, Seoul.
  11. D. K. Kim. (2006). A Study of the Relationship between Lifestyle Groups of College Students and Their Program Preferences with emphasis on Entertainment Programs of Three Major TV Stations(KBS, MBC, SBS). Master thesis. Yonsei University, Seoul.
  12. D. G. Seo. (2019). A Study on the Change of Design ecognition to Revitalize the Domestic Automotive Tuning Industry. Doctoral thesis. Kyunghee University, Seoul.
  13. W. S. Yeom & K. M. Park. (2017). Optimal Design of Body Frame for One-Seater Automotive. Journal of the Korean Society of Mechanical Technology, 2017(12), 77-77.
  14. D. S. Yun. & Y. G Chang, (2006). DSP Filter and Fuzzy Logic Desigh for the integration of the Driving Simulator System with All Terrain Autonomous Unmanned Vehicle. Journal of the Korean Society of Mechanical Technology, 8(2), 95-100.
  15. S. I. Hwang & Y. J. Kim. (2006). Development of Autonomous Guidance System Using Machine Vision and Gyro-Sensor(I) (1) Development of algorithm at straight path- .Journal of the Korean Society of Mechanical Technology, 8(2), 87-93.
  16. Saffer. D. (2012). Interaction Design. Seoul : Acorn.
  17. Interaction Design Foundation. (2018). The Basics of User Experience Design. [Brochure]. Aarhus : Soegaard. M.
  18. M. K. Lee. (2003). A Study on User-Centered Vehicle Designs. Archives of Design Research, 299-308.
  19. W. M. Yang. (2013). Effect of Product Attributes of Environmentally-friendly Automobile with Well-being Lifestyle as the Moderating Variable on Purchasing Intentions. Master thesis. Kyunghee University, Seoul.
  20. Nielsen Norman Group. (2000). Why You Only Need to Test with 5 Users. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/why-you-only-need-to-test-with-5-users/