The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Time efficiency and operator convenience of using a micro-screw in image registration for guided implant surgery

마이크로스크류가 가이드 임플란트 수술을 위한 영상정합 과정에서 작업시간과 술자편의성에 미치는 영향

  • Mai, Hai Yen (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Du-Hyeong (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
  • 마이해엔 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 이두형 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2019.04.30
  • Accepted : 2019.06.20
  • Published : 2019.07.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The image registration of radiographic image and digital surface data is essential in the computer-guided implant guide system. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of using micro-screw on the working time and convenience of operators in the process of image matching for guided implant surgery. Materials and methods: A mandibular dental model was prepared in partial edentulism for Kennedy class I classification. Two micro-screws were placed on the each side of retromolar area. Radiographic and scan images were taken using computed-tomography and digital scanning. The images were superimposed by 12 operators in software in two different conditions: using remaining teeth image alone and using teeth and micro-screws images. Working time, operator convenience and satisfaction were obtained, and analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test (${\alpha}=.05$). Results: The working time was not statistically different between image registration conditions (P>.05); however, operator convenience and satisfaction were higher in the teeth and micro-screw assisted condition than in the teeth-alone assisted condition (P<.001). Conclusion: The use of micro-screw for the image registration has no effect in working time reduction, but improves operator convenience and satisfaction.

목적:컴퓨터 가이드 임플란트 수술에서 방사선 영상과 디지털 영상과의 정합은 필수적인 과정이다. 본 연구의 목적은 마이크로스크류의 사용이 가이드 수술을 위한 영상정합 과정에서 작업시간과 술자편의성에 미치는 영향을 조사하는 것이다. 재료 및 방법: 연구모형의 제작을 위해 Kennedy class I 하악 덴티폼에 마이크로스크류 2개를 후구치 삼각 부위에 식립 후 컴퓨터 단층촬영과 디지털 스캔을 통해 방사선 영상과 스캔 영상을 획득하였다. 영상들은 잔존 치아 부위만을 이용하는 방법과 치아와 마이크로스크류를 이용하는 방법을 이용하여 12명의 술자에 의해 중첩되었다. 이 중첩된 영상에 대하여 작업시간, 술자편의성, 만족도의 자료가 수집되고, Mann-Whitney U test을 통해 분석되었다. 결과: 작업시간은 영상정합 조건 사이에 통계학적인 차이가 없었다 (P > .05). 술자편의성과 만족도는 치아와 마이크로스크류를 이용하는 방법에서 잔존 치아 부위만을 이용하는 방법보다 높았다 (P < .001). 결론: 영상정합에서 마이크로스크류의 이용은 작업시간의 단축에는 영향을 미치지 않지만 술자편의성과 만족도는 향상시킨다.

Keywords

References

  1. Rungcharassaeng K, Caruso JM, Kan JY, Schutyser F, Boumans T. Accuracy of computer-guided surgery: A comparison of operator experience. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:407-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.004
  2. Kola MZ, Shah AH, Khalil HS, Rabah AM, Harby NM, Sabra SA, Raghav D. Surgical templates for dental implant positioning; current knowledge and clinical perspectives. Niger J Surg 2015;21:1-5. https://doi.org/10.4103/1117-6806.152720
  3. Nickenig HJ, Eitner S. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2007;35:207-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2007.02.004
  4. Ganz SD. Three-dimensional imaging and guided surgery for dental implants. Dent Clin North Am 2015;59:265-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2014.11.001
  5. Gargari M, Prete V, Pujia M, Ceruso FM. Development of patient-based questionnaire about aesthetic and functional differences between overdentures implant-supported and overdentures tooth-supported. Study of 43 patients with a follow up of 1 year. Oral Implantol (Rome) 2013;5:86-91.
  6. Schneider D, Marquardt P, Zwahlen M, Jung RE. A systematic review on the accuracy and the clinical outcome of computer-guided template-based implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:73-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01788.x
  7. Van Assche N, van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Jacobs R. Accuracy assessment of computer-assisted flapless implant placement in partial edentulism. J Clin Periodontol 2010;37:398-403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01535.x
  8. Lee DH, An SY, Hong MH, Jeon KB, Lee KB. Accuracy of a direct drill-guiding system with minimal tolerance of surgical instruments used for implant surgery: a prospective clinical study. J Adv Prosthodont 2016;8:207-13. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.3.207
  9. Flugge T, Derksen W, Te Poel J, Hassan B, Nelson K, Wismeijer D. Registration of cone beam computed tomography data and intraoral surface scans - A prerequisite for guided implant surgery with CAD/CAM drilling guides. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017;28:1113-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12925
  10. DE Vico G, Spinelli D, Bonino M, Schiavetti R, Pozzi A, Ottria L. Computer-assisted virtual treatment planning combined with flapless surgery and immediate loading in the rehabilitation of partial edentulies. Oral Implantol (Rome) 2012;5:3-10.
  11. Kim JE, Amelya A, Shin Y, Shim JS. Accuracy of intraoral digital impressions using an artificial landmark. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:755-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.016
  12. Oh JH, An X, Jeong SM, Choi BH. Digital workflow for computer-guided implant surgery in edentulous patients: A case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;75:2541-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2017.08.008
  13. Widmann G, Zangerl A, Keiler M, Stoffner R, Bale R, Puelacher W. Flapless implant surgery in the edentulous jaw based on three fixed intraoral reference points and imageguided surgical templates: accuracy in human cadavers. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:835-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01884.x
  14. Lee DH. Strategic use of microscrews for enhancing the accuracy of computer-guided implant surgery in fully edentulous arches: A case history report. Int J Prosthodont 2018;31:262-3. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.5676
  15. Mai HN, Choi SY, Lee ST, Lee DH. Optimizing accuracy in computer-guided implant surgery with a superimpositionanchor microscrew system: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:789.e1-789.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.04.014
  16. Orentlicher G, Abboud M. Guided surgery for implant therapy. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2011;23:239-56, v-vi. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2011.01.008
  17. Tahmaseb A, Wismeijer D, Coucke W, Derksen W. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:25-42. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g1.2
  18. Chen X, Yuan J, Wang C, Huang Y, Kang L. Modular preoperative planning software for computer-aided oral implantology and the application of a novel stereolithographic template: a pilot study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010;12:181-93.
  19. Jung RE, Schneider D, Ganeles J, Wismeijer D, Zwahlen M, Hammerle CH, Tahmaseb A. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:92-109.
  20. Hultin M, Svensson KG, Trulsson M. Clinical advantages of computer-guided implant placement: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:124-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02545.x
  21. Scherer U, Stoetzer M, Ruecker M, Gellrich NC, von See C. Template-guided vs. non-guided drilling in site preparation of dental implants. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19:1339-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1346-7