디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제17권6호
  • /
  • Pages.1-9
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

유튜브 비디오 보기 활동이 영어 독해 능력 향상에 미치는 영향

A Study on Youtube Video-Watching Activities and their Effects on Improving English Reading Comprehension Skills

  • Kim, Na-Young (Department of General Education, Sehan University)
  • 투고 : 2019.02.15
  • 심사 : 2019.06.20
  • 발행 : 2019.06.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 유튜브 비디오 보기 활동이 국내 대학생의 영어 독해 능력 향상에 미치는 영향을 조사한 것으로, 유튜브 비디오 보기 활동을 통해 국내 대학생의 영어 독해 능력이 실제로 상승하는지 여부를 알아보는 데 그 목적이 있다. 16주 동안 총 148명의 참가자가 세 개의 실험그룹과 한 개의 통제그룹으로 나뉘어 본 연구에 참여하였으며, 각각의 실험그룹은 수업 시작 전, 수업 중, 수업 종료 후 유튜브 비디오 보기 활동을 진행하였다. 연구 시작 전과 종료 후 각각 사전 사후 독해 능력 평가를 실시한 후, 대응표본 t-검증을 통해 유튜브 보기 활동의 효과를 파악하였고, 그룹 간 비교를 위해 일원분산분석을 실시하였다. 본 연구의 주요 결과 및 시사점은 다음과 같다. 사전 사후 평가 결과 모든 실험 그룹에서 영어 독해 능력이 유의미하게 상승한 것으로 나타나 수업 전, 수업 중, 수업 후 유튜브 비디오 보기 활동의 효과를 증명하였다. 한편 독해 능력 상승에 대한 그룹 간 차이는 유의미하지 않은 것으로 밝혀졌다. 본 연구는 영어 독해 능력 향상을 위한 유튜브 비디오 활용에 대한 시사점을 제시하는데 그 의의를 갖는다.

In an effort to explore the effects of Youtube video-watching activities on Korean college students' English reading comprehension skills, 148 undergraduate students who enrolled in a General English class at a university in Korea participated in the present study. Participants were randomly classified into four groups - three experimental groups and one control group - according to when they watch videos: before class (n = 33), during class (n = 42), after class (n = 36), and none (n = 37). Over 16 weeks, the three experimental groups engaged in Youtube video-watching activities for about 10 minutes before, during, and after the class, while the control group did not. Pre- and post-tests were administered to confirm the effects of the use of Youtube videos on improving English reading comprehension skills. To compare the improvement between groups, a one-way ANOVA was also run. Major findings are as follows: First, participants in all the three experimental groups significantly improved their English reading comprehension skills, indicating the beneficial effects of Youtube video-watching activities. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the mean improvement between the groups. Based on this, limitations and suggestions for the future research are discussed at the end.

키워드

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_1_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. YouTube Videos

Table 1. Participants

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_1_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Changes in Reading Comprehension Skills

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_1_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Improvement between Groups

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_1_t0003.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. J. Brook. (2011). The affordances of YouTube for language learning and teaching. Hawaii Pacific University TESOL Working Paper Series, 9(1-2), 37-56.
  2. A. Alm. (2006). CALL for autonomy, competence and relatedness: Motivating language learning environments in Web 2.0. The JALT CALL Journal, 2(3), 29-38. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v2n3.30
  3. B. Dieu, A. P. Campbell, & R. Ammann. (2006). P2P and learning ecologies in EFL/ESL. The Journal of Teaching English with Technology, 6(3), Retrieved March 30, 2011 from: http://www.tewtjournal.org/VOL%206/ISSUE%203/02_P2PANDLEARNIN G.pdf
  4. D. R. Malhiwsky. (2010). Student achievement using Web 2.0 technologies: A mixed methods study. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Nebraska.
  5. D. Nunan. (1999). Second language teaching and learning. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
  6. D. Hazzard. (2006). Motivating ESL/EFL students to use English through movie making. The Internet TESL Journal, 12(12), Retrieved March 30. 2011 from: http://iteslj.org/Techniques/HazzardMakingMovies.html
  7. B. Kelsen. (2009). Teaching EFL to the iGeneration: A survey of using YouTube as supplementary material with gollege EFL students in Taiwan. Call-EJ Online, 10(2), 1-18.
  8. C. A. Mayora. (2009). Using YouTube to encourage authentic writing in EFL classrooms. TESL Reporter, 42(1), 1-12.
  9. K. H. Pong. (2010). Learners' anxieties on posting their own speeches on Youtube. com: Facilitative or debilitative? In Selected Papers from the Third Conference on College English: College English Issues and Trends, 3, 73-100.
  10. M. Warschauer & D. Grimes. (2007). Audience, authorship, and artifact: The emergent semiotics of Web 2.0. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190508070013
  11. J. E. Hanley, C. A. Herron, & S. P. Cole. (1995). Using video as an advance organizer to a written passage in the FLES classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 79(1), 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05416.x
  12. C. Canning-Wilson & J. Wallace. (2000). Practical aspects of using video in the foreign language classroom. The Internet TESL Journal, 6(11), Retrieved November 30, 2015, from the World Wide Web: http://iteslj.org/Articles/Canning-Video.html
  13. R. B. Lockwood. (2014). Flip it! Strategies for the ESL classroom. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  14. H. W. Marshall & A. DeCapua. (2013). Making the transition to classroom success: Culturally responsive teaching for struggling language learners. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  15. I. Kostka, & R. B. Lockwood. (2015). What's on the internet for flipping English language instruction. Tesl-Ej, 19(2), 1-12.
  16. S. Britsch. (2009). ESOL educators and the experience of visual literacy. Tesol Quarterly, 43(4), 710-721. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00197.x
  17. T. Jones & K. Cuthrell. (2011). YouTube: Educational potentials and pitfalls. Computers in the Schools, 28(1), 75-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2011.553149
  18. F. Harun & S. Hussin. (2017). The acceptance of flipped language learning (FLL): A study of engineering students at technical matriculation college. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 12(24), 14495-14504.
  19. H. Daller & D. Phelan. (2006). The C-test and TOEIC(R) courses in EFL. In Grotjahn, R. (Ed.), Der C-Test: Theorie, Empirie, Anwendungen/ The C-test: Theory, empirical research, applications. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 101-119.
  20. S. Gilfert. (1996). A review of TOEIC. The Internet TESL Journal, 2(8), Retrieved March 3, 2017 from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Gilfert-TOEIC.html
  21. N. Y. Kim. (2018). Corpus technology and video technology: Effects on EFL argumentative writing. New Korean Journal of English Language and Literature, 60(2), 195-217. https://doi.org/10.25151/nkje.2018.60.2.011
  22. J. Baek. (2016). Implicit cognitive strategies of EFL college reading. Studies in Linguistics, 38, 285-313. https://doi.org/10.17002/sil..38.201601.285