Figure 1. Results on each ecosystem service index of cities in Gyeonggi-do.
Figure 2. Ecosystem service bundles of cities in Gyeonggi-do arranged in Korean alphabetical order (Abbreviations are defined in Table 1).
Figure 3. Result on first and second dimensions of principal component analysis among regional ecosystem services (Left: Graph of variables, Light: Graph of individuals).
Figure 4. Results on cluster analysis and bundles of ecosystem services.
Table 1. Indicators and methodology of ecosystem services
Table 2. Results on rotated component matrix from principal component analysis (P=Provision, R=Regulation, S=Supporting and C=Cultural services)
Table 3. Features of ecosystem service clusters and their land uses of cities in Gyeonggi-do
References
- Baro F, Gomez-Baggethun E, Haase D. 2017. Ecosystem service bundles along the urban-rural gradient: insights for landscape planning and management, Ecosystem Services. 24: 147-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.021
- Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ. 2009. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters. 12(1): 1394-1404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x
- Charrad M, Ghazzali N, Boiteau V, Niknafs A. 2014. NbClust: an R package for determining the relavant number of clusters in a data set. Journal of Statistical Software. 61(6): 1-36.
- Conte ME, Nelson E, Carney K, Fissore C, Nasser O, Plantinga AJ, Stanley B, Rickett T. 2011. Terrestrial carbon sequestration and storage. In: Kareiva P, Tallis H, Rickett T, Daily GC, Polasky S. Natural capital: theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services. New York: Oxford University Press: 111-128.
- Crouzat E, Mouchet M, Turkelboom F, Byczek C, Meersmans J, Berger F, Verkerk PJ, Lavorel S. 2015. Assessing bundles of ecosystem services from regional to landscape scale: insight from the French Alps. Journal of Applied Ecology 52: 1145-1155. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12502
- Derkzen ML, van Teeffelen AA, Verburg PH. 2015. Quantifying urban ecosystem services based on high-resolution data of urban green space: an assessment for Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Journal of Applied Ecology. 52(4): 1020-1032. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12469
- Egoh B, Drakou EG, Dunbar MB, Maes J, Willemen L. 2012. Indicators for mapping ecosystem services: a review. Luxembourg: European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC).
- Francesconi W, Srinivasan R, Perez-Minana E, Willcock SP. 2016. Using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to model ecosystem services: a systematic review. Journal of Hydrology. 535: 625-636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.034
- Goldstein JH, Caldarone G, Duarte TK, Ennaanay D, Hannahs N, Mendoza G, Polasky S, Wolny S, Daily GC. 2012. Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions. P. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 109(19): 7565-7570. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1201040109
- Hamann M, Biggs R, Reyers B. 2015. Mapping social-ecological systems: identifying 'green-loop' and 'red-loop' dynamics based on characteristic bundles of ecosystem service use. Global Environmental Change. 34: 218-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.07.008
- Hutcheson W, Hoagland P, Jin D. 2018. Valuing environmental education as a cultural ecosystem service at Hudson River Park. Ecosystem Services. 31: 387-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.005
- KFRI. 2017. The lungs of the city, urban forests, Seoul: KFRI. [Korean Literature]
- Kim YJ, Gal BS, Park JB, Kim SH, Im TH. 2018. Classification of Nakdong river tributaries under priority management based on their characteristics and water quality index. Journal of Korean Society of Environmental Engineers. 40(2): 73-81. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.4491/KSEE.2018.40.2.73
- Lee DY, Lee HY. 2016. Regional classification and analysis of the characteristics suburban rural areas in the capital region for promoting area-specific policies. Journal of the KRSA. 32(2): 15-29. [Korean Literature]
- Lee H, Lautenbach S. 2016. A quantitative review of relationships between ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators 66: 340-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.004
- Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Millenium ecosystem assessment synthesis report, Washington DC: Island press.
- Maes J, Egoh B, Willemen L, Liquette C, Vihervaara P, Schagner JP, Grizzetti B, Drakou EG, La Notte A, Zulian G, Bouraoui F, Paracchini ML, Braat L, Bidoglio G. 2012. Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union. Ecosystem Services. 1: 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.004
- NIE. 2017. Mapping and assessment of ecosystem services, Seocheon: NIE. [Korean Literature]
- NIE. 2018. A study on the evaluation and awareness of local ecological value, Seocheon: NIE. [Korean Literature]
- Niemela J, Saarela SR, Soderman T, Kopperoinen L, Yli-Pelkonen V, Vare S, Kotze J. 2010. Using the ecosystem service approach for better planning and conservation of urban green spaces: a Finland case study. Biodiversity and Conservation. 19(11): 3225-3243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9888-8
- Park IH, Kim YH, Cho KJ. 2012. Bird species diversity analysis according to the type of forest vegetation. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology. 15(6): 43-52. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.13087/KOSERT.2012.15.6.043
- Queiroz C, Meacham M, Richter K, Norstrom AV, Andersson E, Norberg J, Peterson G. 2015. Mapping bundles of ecosystem services reveals distinct types of multifunctionality within a Swedish landscape. Ambio. 44: s89-s101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0601-0
- Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Bennett M. 2010. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 107(11): 5242-5247. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907284107
- Reyers B, Biggs R, Cumming GS, Elmqvist T, Hejnowicz AP. 2013. Getting the measure of ecosystem services: a social-ecological approach. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 11: 268-273. https://doi.org/10.1890/120144
- Risal A, Bhattarai R, Kim D, Park Y, Yang J, Lim K. 2016. Application of Web ERosivity Module (WERM) for estimation of annual and monthly R factor in Korea. Catena. 147: 225-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.07.017
- Rho PH, Choung EL. 2006. Alternatives of the Korean Nationwide Survey on Natural Environments to Promote Biodiversity Conservation. Journal of Environmental Policy. 5(3): 25-56. [Korean Literature]
- Roh YH, Kim CK, Hong HJ. 2016. Time-series changes to ecosystem regulating services in Jeju: focusing on estimating carbon sequestration and evaluating economic feasibility. Journal of Environmental Policy. 24(2): 29-44. [Korean Literature]
- Satz D, Gould RK, Chan KMA, Guerry A, Norton B, Satterfield T, Halpern BS, Levine J, Woodside U, Hannahs N, Basurto X, Klain S. 2013. The challenges of incorporating cultural ecosystem services into environmental assessment. Ambio. 42: 675-684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-013-0386-6
- Song CH, Lee WK, Choi HA, Jeon SW, Kim JU, Kim JS, Kim JT. 2015. Application of InVEST water yield model for assessing forest water provisioning ecosystem service. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies. 18(1): 120-134. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.11108/kagis.2015.18.1.120
- Song MK, Chang H. 2010. Characterization of cities in Seoul metropolitan area by cluster analysis. Journal of Korean Society for Geospatial Information System. 18(1): 83-88. [Korean Literature]
- Sparke R, Lasseur R, Crouzat E, Bullock JM, Lavorel S, Parks KE, Schaafsma M, Bennett EM, Maes J, Mulligan M, Mouchet M, Peterson GD, Schulp CJE, Thuiller W, Turner MG, Verburg PH, Eigenbord F. 2017. Unpacking ecosystem service bundles: towards predictive mapping of synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change 47: 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.08.004
- Suh K, Kim TG, Lee JM, Lee JJ. 2012. Effective classification framework design and implementation for rural regional information using principal component analysis and cluster analysis. Journal of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers. 54(1): 73-81. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.5389/KSAE.2012.54.1.073
- Turner KG, Odgaard MV, Bocher PK, Dalgaard T, Svenning JC. 2014. Bundling ecosystem services in Denmark: trade-offs and synergies in a cultural landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning. 125: 89-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.02.007
- Verner J, Morison ML, Ralph CJ. 1986. Wildlife 2000: Modeling habitat relationships of terrestrial vertebrates. Madison Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin press.
- Yang G, Ge Y, Xue H, Yang W, Shi Y, Peng C, Du Y, Fan X, Ren Y, Chang J. 2015. Using ecosystem service bundles to detect trade-offs and synergies across urban-rural complexes. Landscape and Urban Planning. 136: 110-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.12.006
Cited by
- 지역 생태자산의 훼손 취약성에 대한 거주민의 인식 차이 - 경기도 파주지역을 대상으로 - vol.49, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.9715/kila.2021.49.1.031