Table 1. Definition and descriptive statistics of the variables (Reorganized based on Kim, 2018)
Table 2. Tobit and Probit estimation of sub-groups for PM improvement in the SMA (Reorganized based on Kim, 2018)
Table 3. Mean WTP of each group based on tobit model (Kim 2018)
References
- Cameron TA, James MD. 1987. Efficient Estimation Methods for “Closed-Ended” Contingent Valuation Surveys. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 69(2): 269-276. https://doi.org/10.2307/1927234
- Carlsson F, Johansson-Stenman O. 2000. Willingness to Pay for Improved Air Quality in Sweden. Applied Economics. 32(6): 661-669. https://doi.org/10.1080/000368400322273
- Cummings RG, Brookshire DS, Schulze WD. (ed.) 1986. Valuing environmental goods: a state of the arts assessment of the contingent valuation method. Totowa, NJ: Roweman and Allanheld.
- Diez T, Stern PC, Guagnano GA. 1998. Social structural and social psychological basis of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior. 30(4): 450-471. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391659803000402
- Dupont PD. 2004. Do children matter? An examination of gender differences in environmental valuation. Ecological Economics. 49: 273-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.01.013
- Francisco ER, Aranha F, Zambaldi F, Goldszmidt R. 2006. Electricity Consumption as a Predictor of Household Income: a Spatial Statistics Approach. Davis CA, Monteiro AMV.(ed.) Advanced Geoinformatics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 267-282.
- Franzen A, Meyer R. 2010. Environmental attitudes in cross-national perspective: a multilevel analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000. European Sociological Review. 26: 219-234. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp018
- Greene WH. 2000. Econometric Analysis, 4th ed. Prentice Hall International, Inc., New Jersey.
- Hong JH, Eom YS. 2010. Estimating demand for public goods using a survey technique: major issues and application of valuating environmental satellite project. Korean Economic Analysis. 17(1): 1-72. [Korean Literature].
- Hoyos D, Mariel P, Fernandez-Macho J. 2009. The influence of cultural identity on the WTP to protect natural resources: Some empirical evidence. 68(8-9): 2372-2381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.03.015
- Jones N, Evangelinos K, Halvadakis CP, Losifides T, Sophoulis CM. 2010. Social factors influencing perceptions and willingness to pay for market-based policy aiming on solid waste management, Resources. Conservation and Recycling. 54: 533-540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.10.010
- Jones N, Malesio C, Botetzagias I. 2009. The influence of social capital on willingness to pay for the environment among European citizens. European Societies. 11(4): 511-530. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616690802624168
-
Kim JW. 2018. Analysis on risk perception and willingness to pay for air quality (
$PM_{10},\;PM_{2.5}$ ) improvement in the Seoul metropolitan area. MA dissertation. Graduate School of International Studies, Yonsei University, Seoul. - KORUS-AQ. 2017. KORUS-AQ Rapid Science Synthesis Report. [Cited 2018 Jan 25]. Available from https://espo.nasa.gov/korus-aq
- Loewenstein GF, Weber EU, Hsee CK, Welch E. 2001. Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin. 127(2): 267-286. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267
- McCright AM. 2010. The effect of gender on climate change knowledge and concern in the American public. Population and Environment. 32: 66-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-010-0113-1
- Mitchell RC, Carson RT. 1989. Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
- Morita T, Managi S. 2015. Consumers' willingness to pay for electricity after the Great East Japan Earthquake. Economic Analysis and Policy. 48: 82-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2015.09.004
- Parry IWH, Heine D, Lis E, Li S. 2014. Getting Energy Prices Right: From Principle to Practice: Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
- Polyzou E, Jones N, Evangelinos KI, Halvadakis CP. 2011. Willingness to pay for drinking water quality improvement and the influence of social capital. Journal of Socio-Economic. 40: 74-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2010.06.010
- Putnam R. 2000. Bowling Alone, New York: Simon and Schuster.
- Ressurreicao A, Gibbons J, Kaiser M, Dentinho TP, Zarzycki T, Bentley C, Austen M, Burdon D, Atkins J, Santos RS, Edwards-Jones G. 2012. Different cultures, different values: The role of cultural variation in public's WTP for marine species conservation. Biological Conservation. 145(1): 148-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.10.026
- Stern PC. 2000. New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues. 56(3): 407-424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
- Stern PC, Dietz T, Kalof L. 1993. Value orientations, gender and environmental concern, Environment and Behavior. 23(5): 322-348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916593255002
-
The Seoul Institute. 2016. Research on inventory building for the source of
$PM_{2.5}$ and detailed monitoring, Seoul: City of Seoul. [Cited 2018 Feb 3]. Available from http://opengov.seoul.go.kr/research/11895404 [Korean Literature]. - Tobin J. 1958. Liquidity preference as behavior towards risk. The Review of Economic Studies. 25(2):65-86. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296205
- United Nations. 2015. Paris Agreement. [Cited 2018 Jan 25]. Available from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf.
-
Wei W, Wu Y. 2017. Willingness to pay to control
$PM_{2.5}$ pollution in Jing-Jin-Ji Region, China. Applied Economics Letters. 24(11): 753-761. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2016.1226482 - Whitmarsh L. 2008. Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response. Journal of Risk Research. 11(3): 351-374. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870701552235
- Yoo SH, Kwak SY. 2009. Willingness to pay for green electricity in Korea: A contingent valuation study. Energy Policy. 37(12): 5408-5416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.062
- Zoric J, Hrovatin N. 2012. Household willingness to pay for green electricity in Slovenia. Energy Policy. 47: 180-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.055