DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study of CO2+(CO2)n Cluster in a Paul Ion Trap

  • Karimi, L. (Department of Chemistry, University of Zanjan) ;
  • Sadat Kiai, S.M. (Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute (NSTR), Plasma and Nuclear Fusion Research School) ;
  • babazaheh, A.R. (Department of Chemistry, University of Zanjan) ;
  • Elahi, M. (Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute (NSTR), Plasma and Nuclear Fusion Research School) ;
  • Shafaei, S.R. (Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute (NSTR), Plasma and Nuclear Fusion Research School)
  • Received : 2018.09.28
  • Accepted : 2018.11.25
  • Published : 2019.03.30

Abstract

In this article, the properties of ${CO_2}^+(CO_2)_n$ clusters in a Paul ion trap have been investigated using mass-selective instability mode which conducted by chosen precursor ions, mainly $Ar^+$ and ${CO_2}^+$ produced by a mixture of Ar and $CO_2$. Exposure of ${CO_2}^+$ ions to $CO_2$ molecules, lead to the formation of ${CO_2}^+(CO_2)_n$ clusters. Here, Ar gas react as a buffer gas and lead to form ${CO_2}^+(CO_2)_n$ cluster by collisional effect.

Keywords

Introduction

Properties of clusters are valuable in many fields of physics, chemistry (e.g. catalysis) and nanotechnology. Their properties depend on the charge, size, and species (atomic, polyatomic and molecular). Rate of cluster's formation is high, and their timescale is limited to a few microseconds. However, some processes such as cooling and chemical reactions cause to reduce of formation's rate so cluster formation may occur in a longer timescale (millisecond to second).1-3

Cluster ions are defined as a combination of a core ion bound in which a van der Waals force governs to one or more neutral atoms and molecules.4 Carbon dioxide is a major gas phase pollutant “greenhouse effect” on the atmosphere; therefore, investigating of monomeric and clustered CO2 structure study is of particular importance.5 In addition, the effect of Ar and Ne gases cause the formation of CO2+(CO2)n clusters and have been studied in reference 6.

Based on a previous study,7 formation of CO2+(CO2)n clusters have a particularly large rate constant. Clusters have very different properties from the isolated atoms/molecules or bulk materials and can constitute a new type of material. In order to produce clusters, one can either aggregate smaller systems (atoms, molecules, small clusters) or break larger systems.7-9 According to reference 10, the small ion clusters that have a fewer number of atoms (n), could be formed during the first 200 ns and take longer time to disappear them.

Small water cluster ions H+(H2O)3∙4 using a three-dimensional quadrupole ion trap (Paul ion trap), has been demonstrated by Lovejoy and Bianco. They were shown this cluster formed in around of 300-500 K.11 They use an ion trap because the ion trap offers the possibility of storing ions in a limited time and a well-defined space range.12 However, other devices, for instance, Penning traps,13,14 quadrupole or multipole linear traps,15 ion storage rings (electrostatic or magnetic16 and electrostatic ion beam traps) are, also, employed.17,18 Formation of cluster molecular ions in a Paul ion trap is practical when the confined ions interact in the applied rf fields. The space charges and binary collisions yield to restrict the number of confinement of cluster ions in an ion trap.

In this article, we examine the capability of our Paul ion trap to produce CO2+(CO2)n cluster ions. Some parameters such as volume percentage of CO2 mixed with Ar gases and radiofrequency voltages have been analyzed. Here, the noble gas Ar plays as a buffer gas that it causes cooling with inelastic collisions.19,20

 

Experimental

Paul ion trap analyzer

The homemade Paul ion trap electrodes are made of stainless steel 316 with z0 = 0.707 cm, that it is one-half the shortest separation of the endcap electrodes and r0 = 1 cm, is the ring electrode radius. The ring electrode has three meshes that involve nine holes with the 0.1 mm diameter and they are around a circle. These meshes are used to  entrance of gas to the trap. They are placed 120 degrees apart from each other.2

A cylinder with a volume of 4.64 x 10-3 m3 was used for the source gas with capacity of 5 bar. Once the cylinder is filled with a mixture of Ar and CO2 gases, the cylinder output is fed to the small stainless steel tubes, 0.5 mm in diameter. There are three tubes to import the mixed gases to the ionization volume inside the trap. This technique effectively provides a better ionization efficiency and consumes less gases.

There are six small holes, which are 0.1 mm diameter in the center of the lower end-cap electrode, to let the electrons cross into the trap ionization volume. Also, the upper end-cap electrode has the same holes for the passage of ions to the detector. The ion trap has hyperbolic geometry that it was estimated to have higher confinement efficiency. The motion of the ion in a Paul ion trap is described by tahe Mathieu equations and in r and z directions are given as:

\(\frac{d^{2} r}{d \xi^{2}}+\left(a_{r}-2 q_{r} \cos 2 \xi\right) r=0\)        (1)   

\(\frac{d^{2} z}{d \xi^{2}}+\left(a_{z}-2 q_{z} \cos 2 \xi\right) z=0\)       (2) 

\(a_{z}=-2 a_{r}=\frac{4 q U}{M Z_{0}^{2} \Omega^{2}}\)       (3)

\(q_{z}=-2 q_{r}=\frac{-2 q V}{M Z_{0}^{2} \Omega^{2}}\)       (4)

\(\xi=\frac{\Omega t}{2}\)       (5)

where U is the direct voltage, V is the alternating radiofrequency voltage, q is the electric charge, M is the mass of ion, Z0 is the one-half the shortest separation of the endcap electrodes and Ω (Ω = 2πf) is the angular frequency.21 Ions are produced in the trap by an impact of electron ionization technique. In general, the process of ion trap operation consists of pulse ionization, rf voltage scanning and data collection to produce peaks.22, 23

 

Experimental setup and measurements

E1MPSV_2019_v10n1_27_f0001.png 이미지

Figure 1. Schematic of experimental set up.

The experimental set up is depicted in Fig. 1. The Paul ion trap in placed in a vacuum chamber with a volume of 0.0147 m3 and pumped through a turbo-pack up to a pressure of 10-5 mbar. The rf voltage is connected between the ring and end-cap electrodes and operated in the mass-selective instability mode; only radio frequency voltage is applied to the ring electrode. The electrons can be provided through an electron gun, which is situated below the lower end-cap electrode. The Tungsten filament can use 0.46 A, with 9 V and a constant current circuit generates a constant flow of electrons. Also, electron acceleration is made through -110 V. We have applied the ejection voltage, up to -300 V, between Faraday-cup detector and the grid earth. The rf voltage produces more than -600 V0→p (zero to pick) voltage with the frequency up to 1.1 MHz. The entire experiments can be adjusted through 10 canal circuit with LVTTL and controled through Labview program.

The output signals obtained from detector were visualized and memorized in oscilloscope. They can provide 200 data on the excel software and can be used as a data for Origin-pro software. Table 1 shows various ionization energies of some gases which employed in the present work.

 

Table 1. Ionization energies (in eV) of different gases20

E1MPSV_2019_v10n1_27_t0002.png 이미지

 

Table 2. Physical properties of CO2 and Ar capsule

E1MPSV_2019_v10n1_27_t0001.png 이미지

 

Results and discussion

Here, Ar was employed as a buffer gas and ultimately, Ar+ ions can transfer their charge to CO2 molecules in less than 1 ns. So, it is the best option for this work:

 

\(\mathrm{Ar}^{+}+\mathrm{CO}_{2} \rightarrow \mathrm{Ar}+\mathrm{CO}_{2}^{+} \quad k=4.80 \pm 0.7210^{-10} \mathrm{cm}^{3} / \mathrm{s}\)       (6)3

 

Effect of various parameters

- Gases ratio \(\left(\frac{\mathrm{Ar}}{\mathrm{CO}_{2}}\right)\)

Figure 2, shows a typical Ar signal. It was obtained directly from the oscilloscope. The ejection voltage can be applied either when the rf voltage is completely stopped or during its working regime. Regarding to a fixed rf frequency, several parameters can have influence on the output signal such as gas pressure, ionization time, rf voltage, and the ejection position and voltages. Nevertheless, some of best condition have been chosen for the experiment.

E1MPSV_2019_v10n1_27_f0003.png 이미지

Figure 2. A typical Ar ions output signal (Purple: Radio frequency, Blue: Extraction voltage, Orange: Grid voltage, Green: Ion signal)

 

E1MPSV_2019_v10n1_27_f0004.png 이미지

Figure 4. The confined of 40Ar+ and 44CO2 ions damping displacement as a function of damping time; the initial displacement: qz = 0.45; z(ξ0) = 1 mm; C = 1; and az = 0.4. The confined off CO2 +, CO2 +(CO2)2, CO2 +(CO2)4, ion clusters damping displacement as a function of damping time; the initial displacement z(ξ0) = 1 mm; C = 1; and az = 0.4.

 

 Numerous experimental papers have been published visualizing the formation of CO2+(CO2)n ion clusters with the following gas ratios; Ar:CO2 = 1:4, 1:3, and 1:1. But for this work, we have used low and high rf voltages for the experiments. Figure 3 shows peaks with low rf voltage, no ion clusters are present. However, at the higher rf voltage, the ion cluster signals are present and, no ion clusters appeared after 600 – 700 μs of the ejection voltage.

 

E1MPSV_2019_v10n1_27_f0002.png 이미지

Figure 3. Signals from gas mixture of Ar and CO2 for low and high rf voltages. (a) Mix Ar (1) + CO2 (1) in high (left) and low (right) voltage, (b) Mix Ar (1) + CO2 (3) in high (left) and low (right) voltage, (c) Mix Ar (1) + CO2 (4) in high (left) and low (right) voltage

 

According to Fig. 3, and the time of flight formula, m2 = m2 x (t2/t1)2, the first peak is identified as Ar+, then, the other peaks are related to CO2+(CO2)n with n = 1 - 6. As seen, for the equal gas mixture proportions, the cluster peak is not clear (see Fig.3(a)), this is also true for the conditions of Ar + 1 bar CO2. Formation of small flat top appeared at the higher rf voltages and depicted in Fig. 3(a)-(c). Accordingly, they are decreasing as the rf voltage is stopped. During the ejection time, the heavier of cluster ions are expected. Indeed, this is due to the beam character of the ion’s cloud during the run down toward the detector through travelling distance of ~ 4 cm to the detector through the upper end cup holes.

One of the important reaction of CO2+ with the gas molecules is a three body reaction, leading to the formation of a CO2+(CO2)n, n = 2,24

 

\(\mathrm{CO}_{2}^{+}+\mathrm{CO}_{2}+\mathrm{M} \rightarrow \mathrm{CO}_{2}^{+}\left(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\right)+\mathrm{M} k=2.1 \times 10^{-28} \mathrm{cm}^{6} / \mathrm{s}\)                                 

The influence of damping force on the ion motion has been studied with qz values (qz = 0.45) near the adiabatic region. Figure 4(a) shows the obtained numerical computations for the initial ion displacement with a damping time of 200 μs for Ar+ of mass m = 40 amu and (CO2)+ of mass m = 44 amu. Furthermore, Figure 4(b) also shows a very strong shift in the damping time when n values rising and gradually moves towards the stability limits (CO2+(CO2)n, n = 0, 2, 4). This can be attributed to the energetic ion and instability of large clusters.

 

Conclusion

In this work, the condition of CO2+(CO2)n cluster ion formation in a Paul ion trap has been studied. First, we have ionized Ar buffer gas which transfer Ar+ charge to CO2 molecules. The process of joining CO2+ ions to another CO2 molecules usually take place in few.. Although CO2+(CO2)n have a large rate constant, nevertheless, the values of n in CO2+(CO2)n cluster ions depended on the pressure of both the buffer gas and the main gas.

As the collisional cooling of CO2+ take place, the mixture of Ar-CO2 peaks are observed and finally, cluster formation occurs. Based on damping time of clusters, the formation of clusters up to n = 11 by increasing the number of carbon dioxide molecules is complicated, the isomers structure would be manifold and complex. In some experiments, when the rf voltage is stopped, we have observed heaver cluster ions. This can be attributed to the cloud beam formation.

 

 

 


 

References

  1. March, R. E. J. Mass Spectrom. 1997, 32, 351. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9888(199704)32:4<351::AID-JMS512>3.0.CO;2-Y
  2. Sadat Kiai, S. M.; Elahi, M.; Adlparvar, S.; Nemati, N.; Shafaei, S. R.; Karimi, L. Mass Spectrom. Lett. 2015, 6, 112. https://doi.org/10.5478/MSL.2015.6.4.112
  3. Kalkan, Y.; Arslandok, M.; Cortez, A. F. V.; Kaya, Y.; Tapan, I.; Veenhof, R. J. Instrum. 2015, 10, 07004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/10/07/P07004
  4. Heinbuch, S.; Dong, F.; Rocca, J. J.; Bernstein, E. R. J. Chem. Phys, 2006, 125, 154316. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2348877
  5. Johnston, R. Atomic and molecular clusters, Taylor and Francis: London, 2002.
  6. Wang, Y.-S.; Tsai, C.-H.; Lee, Y. T.; Chang, H.-C. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 4217. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp022156m
  7. Bredy, R.; Bernard, J.; Chen, L.; Montagne, G.; Li, B.; Martin, S. J. Phys. B 2009, 42, 154023. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/42/15/154023
  8. Pollack, S.; Cameron, D.; Rokni, M.; Hill, W.; Parks, J. H.; Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 256, 101. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(96)00413-7
  9. Jovan Jose, K. V.; Gadre, S. R. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 128, 124310. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2838202
  10. Lovejoy, E.; Bianco, R.; J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 10280. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp001216q
  11. Bredy, R,; Bernard, J.; Chen, L.; Montagne, G.; Li, B.; Martin, S. J. Phys. B 2009, 42, 154023. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/42/15/154023
  12. Brown, L. S.; Gabrielse, G. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1986, 58, 233. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.58.233
  13. Paul, W. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1990, 62, 531. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.62.531
  14. Bernhardt, T. M. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2005, 243, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2004.12.015
  15. Adersen, J. U.; Ansersen, L. H.; Hvelplund, P.; Lapierrei, A.; Moller, S. P.; Nielsen, S. B.; Pedersen, U. V.; Tomita S. Hyperfine Interact. 2003, 146, 283. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HYPE.0000004201.81619.ab
  16. Diner, A.; Toker, Y.; Strasser, D.; Heber, O.; Ben-Itzhak, I.; Witte, P. D.; Wolf, A.; Schwalm, D.; Rappaport, M. L.; Bhushan, K. G.; Zajfman, D. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2004, 93, 063402. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.063402
  17. Schmidt, H. T.; Cederquist, H.; Jensen, J.; Fardi, A. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 2001, 173, 523. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-583X(00)00415-8
  18. Overlay, O.; Ikezoe, Y.; Overlay, O.; Shimizu, S.; Sato, S.; Matsuoka, S.; Nakamura H.; Tamura, T. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 1982, 20, 253. https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-5724(82)90034-6
  19. Gerlich, D. The Production and Study of Ultra-Cold Molecular Ions, Chapter 6, world scientific publishing Ltd: London. 2008.
  20. Kiyania, A.; Abdollahzadeha, M.; Sadat Kiaib, S. M.; Zirak, A. R. J. fusion energy 2011, 30, 291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-010-9369-9
  21. Colby, S. M.; Reilly, J. P. Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry and its Applications, Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1994, 125.
  22. Anicich, V. G. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 22, 1469.
  23. Rashit, A. B.; Werneck, P. Z. Naturforsch, 1979, 34a, 1410. https://doi.org/10.1515/zna-1979-1205
  24. Castleman, A. W.; Khanna, J.; Khanna, S. N. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 2664. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp806850h