DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Topography Characteristics on the Land Creep in Korea

우리나라 땅밀림지의 지형 특성

  • Park, Jae-Hyeon (Department of Forest Resources, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Seo, Jung Il (Department of Forest Resource, Kongju National University) ;
  • Lee, Changwoo (Division of Forest Disaster Management, National Institute of Forest Science)
  • 박재현 (경남과학기술대학교 산림자원학과) ;
  • 서정일 (공주대학교 산림자원학과) ;
  • 이창우 (국립산림과학원 산림방재과)
  • Received : 2018.10.18
  • Accepted : 2019.01.11
  • Published : 2019.03.31

Abstract

This study was carried out to analysis the landform characteristics of land creep areas in south Korea. Aspect ratio in 17 areas (approximately 46.0 %) among total land creep areas (37 areas) was ranged from 0.37 to 0.92. Also, aspect ratio in 36 areas (approximately 97.0 %) was less than 2. Longitudinal section form ratio of 15 areas (approximately 41.0 %) was less than 1.0, whereas 22 areas (approximately 59.0 %) were more than 1.0. Horseshoe hoof form in land creep areas were mostly appeared to flat land types, whereas convex terrain ground form was prevailed to micro-topography. Mean contour intervals were higher in micro-topography (mean 29.4 m, range 9.5 m ~ 83.2 m) than in except micro-topography (mean 24.3 m, range: 14.4 m ~ 59.4 m) in land creep areas. The contour intervals were slightly wider in micro-topography (mean 5.1 m, range: 4.9 m ~ 23.8 m) than in except micro-topography in land creep areas. The results indicate that contour intervals were significantly different (P < 0.05) between micro-topography and except micro-topography in land creep areas.

우리나라에서 발생된 땅밀림지의 지형특성을 분석하여 땅밀림지에 대한 지형적인 기초자료를 제공하기 위하여 실시하였다. Aspect ratio가 1.00 미만인 땅밀림지는 전체 37개소 중 17개소(약 46.0 %)로 0.37 ~ 0.92의 범위를 나타내었다. 또한 Aspect ratio가 2.00 미만인 경우는 전체 37개소 중 36개소(약 97.0 %)이었다. 종단형상비가 1.00 미만인 땅밀림 지역은 총 37개소 중 15개소(약 41.0 %)이었으며, 1.00 이상인 땅밀림지는 22개소(약 59.0 %)이었다. 우리나라에서 발생한 전체 37개소의 땅밀림지 중 평면형지형은 말발굽형이 가장 많은 것으로 나타났다. 또한 미세지형은 철(凸)상대지상 지형이 가장 많은 것으로 나타났다. 땅밀림지역의 미세지형의 등고선 간격을 평균한 결과 29.4(9.5 ~ 83.2)m이었으며, 땅밀림지 내에서 미세지형을 제외한 땅밀림지 내의 평균등고선 간격은 24.3(14.4 ~ 59.4)m로 미세지형이 5.1(4.9 ~ 23.8)m 더 넓게 나타났다. 우리나라에서 발생한 땅밀림지 내에서 미세지형의 평균 등고선 간격과 미세지형을 제외한 평균 등고선 간격의 T-test 분석 결과 5 % 수준에서 유의한 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

HOMHBJ_2019_v108n1_50_f0001.png 이미지

Figure 1. Location map of the study site. (KIGAM, 2018)1. san262, Unbuk-dong, Jung-gu, Incheon-si, 2. san11-1, Seoksu-dong, Manan-gu, Anyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 3. san12-1, Baegan-ri, Yangpyeong-eup, Yangpyeong-gun, Gyeonggi-do, 4. Nogok 2ri, Nogok1ri, Wondeok-eup, Samcheok-si, Gangwon-do, 5. san74, Sangmaengbang-ri, Geundeok-myeon, Samcheok-si, Gangwon-do, 6. 176, Chogok-gil, Geundeok-myeon, Samcheok-si, Gangwon-do, 7. san1, Gujeol-ri, Yeoryang-myeon, Jeongseon-gun, Gangwon-do, 8. san148, Yachon-ri, Nam-myeon, Yanggu-gun, Gangwon-do, 9. san12, Sindae-ri,Munui-myeon, Sangdang-gu, Cheongju-si, Chungcheongbuk-do, 10.san46-7, Sang-ri, Yeongchun-myeon, Danyang-gun, Chungcheongbuk-do, 11. 143-10, Bugok-ri, Songak-eup, Dangjin-si, Chungcheongnam-do, 12. 44-7, Sinjindaegyo-gil, Geunheung-myeon, Taean-gun,Chungcheongnam-do, 13. san54-5, Jangsu-ri, Bongdong-eup, Wanju-gun, Jeollabuk-do, 14. san29, Honggye-ri, Daesong-myeon, Nam-gu, Pohang-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do, 15. san110-1, Yongheung-dong,Buk-gu, Pohang-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do, 16. san18, Chilseong-ri, Chuksan-myeon, Yeongdeok-gun, Gyeongsangbuk-do, 17. san8-2, Geumho-ri, Jicheon-myeon, Chilgok-gun, Gyeongsangbuk-do, 18. 72,Hyangyang-ro 217beon-gil, Jiphyeon-myeon, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 19. san12, Chucheon-ri, Gonmyeong-myeon, Sacheon-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 20. san33, Samjung-ri, Gonmyeong-myeon, Sacheon-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 21. san58, Jakpal-ri, Gonmyeong-myeon,Sacheon-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 22. san49, Jodo-ri, Seopo-myeon,Sacheon-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 23. 1082-1, Naesam-ri, Juchon-myeon, Gimhae-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 24. san131-29, Mae-ri, Sangdong-myeon, Gimhae-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 25. san333-5, Eogok-dong, Yangsan-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 26. 1024-1, Halim2-gil, Gunbug-myeon, Haman-gun, Gyeongsangnam-do, 27. san80-1, Pyeonsa-ri,Agyang-myeon, Hadong-gun, Gyeongsangnam-do, 28. san217, Cheongnyong-ri, Okjong-myeon, Hadong-gun, Gyeongsangnam-do, 29.san36, Sangsin-ri, Ssangchaeg-myeon, Hapcheon-gun, Gyeongsangnam-do, 30. san213, Wolgye-ri, Gahoe-myeon, Hapcheon-gun, Gyeongsangnam-do, 31. 88, Hwangnyeong-daero 319beon-gil, Nam-gu,Busan, 32. san96-9, Janglim-dong, Saha-gu, Busan 33. 929, Dadae-dong, Saha-gu, Busan, 34. 154, Jodong 1-gil, Sindong-eup, Jeongseon-gun, Gangwon-do, 35. san90, Geummae-ri, Maehwa-myeon, Uljin-gun, Gyeongsangbuk-do, 36. san39, Unam-ri, Miwon-myeon, Sangdang-gu, Cheongju-si, Chungcheongbuk-do, 37. san108, Hwanghwajeong-ri, Yeonmu-eup, Nonsan-si, Chungcheongnam-do

HOMHBJ_2019_v108n1_50_f0002.png 이미지

Figure 2. Aspect ratio (L / M), longitudinal section form ratio(equivalence friction factor, H / L). (Takaya, 2017)

HOMHBJ_2019_v108n1_50_f0003.png 이미지

Figure 3. Flat form classification. (Park, 2018)

HOMHBJ_2019_v108n1_50_f0004.png 이미지

Figure 4. Convex terrain and longitudinal section(a), convex terrain ground form(b), terrace concave ground(c), polygon concaveground(d), concave gentle slope form(e). (Park, 2018)

Table 1. Results of ratio aspect (L / M) and characteristics.

HOMHBJ_2019_v108n1_50_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Results of ratio aspect (H / L) and characteristics.

HOMHBJ_2019_v108n1_50_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Types of land creep in korea(flat form / fine form).

HOMHBJ_2019_v108n1_50_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Average contour interval in korea landcreeps and average contour interval excluding find form.

HOMHBJ_2019_v108n1_50_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Average contour interval in korea land creep and average contour Interval excluding find form (T-test analysis results).

HOMHBJ_2019_v108n1_50_t0005.png 이미지

References

  1. Anderson, M.G. and Richards, K.S. 1987. Slope Stability. Wildly and Sons. pp. 210.
  2. Auzet, A.V and Ambroise, B. 1996. Soil creep dynamics, soil moisture and temperature conditions on a forested slope in the granitic Vosges Mountains, France. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 21(6): 531-542. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9837(199606)21:6<531::AID-ESP606>3.0.CO;2-B
  3. Culling, W.E.H 1963. Soil creep and the development of hillside slopes. The Journal of Geology 71(2): 127-161. https://doi.org/10.1086/626891
  4. Davis, W.M. 1899. The geographical cycle. The Journal of Geology 14(5): 481-504.
  5. Jau, J.G., Park, S.J., Son. D.S. and Joo, S.H. 2000. The effects of geological and topographical features on landslide and land-creep. Journal of Korean Forest Society 89(3): 323-334.
  6. Kim, C.S., Park, J.H., Cho, H.S., Ma, H.S. and Lee, G.S. 2015. Physiochemical properties of organic and soil horizon in restoration area following forest landslide by creeping soils. Journal of Agriculture & Life Science 49(6): 27-35. https://doi.org/10.14397/jals.2015.49.6.27
  7. Kim, H.G. 2004. Slope stability and characteristics of shallow landslide occurred in granite hillslopes. (Master Thesis). Seoul. KyungHee University, Korea.
  8. Matsukura, Y. and Tanaka, Y. 1983. Stability analysis for soil slips of two gruss slope in southern abukuma mountains, Japan. Transactions, Japanese Geomorphological Union 4: 229-239.
  9. Montgomery, D. R., Sullivan, K. and Greenberg, H. M. 1998. Regional test of a model for shallow landslide. Hydrological Processes 12: 943-955. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199805)12:6<943::AID-HYP664>3.0.CO;2-Z
  10. Park, J.H. 2015. Analysis on the characteristics of the landslide - with a special reference on geo-topographical characteristics -. Journal of Korean Forest Society 104(4): 588-597. https://doi.org/10.14578/jkfs.2015.104.4.588
  11. Park, J.H. 2016. The actual conditions and management of land creep in korea. Korean Society of Forestry Environment Research 19: 40-50.
  12. Park, J.H. 2018. What's land creep. Korean Society of Forest Environment Research 21: 96-107.
  13. Park, J.H., Choi, K., Lee, S.G., Ma, H.S., Lee, J.H. and Woo, B.M. 2003. Analysis on the characteristics of the landslide in nasamri( I ) - with a special reference on geo-topographical characteristics -. Journal of Korean Forest Society 92(3): 246-253.
  14. Park, J.H., Choi, K., Bae, J.S., Ma, H.S. and Lee, J.H. 2005. Analysis on the characteristics of the landslide in maeri ( I ) - with a special reference on geo-topographical characteristics -. Journal of Korean Forest Society 94(3): 129-134.
  15. Park, J.H., Lee, C.W., Kang, M.J. and Kim, K.D. 2015. Analysis of characteristic of forest environmental factors on land creeping occurrence. Journal of Agriculture and Life Science 49(5): 133-144. https://doi.org/10.14397/jals.2015.49.5.133
  16. Shunji I. 1978. Soil creep measurements in khumbu. Journal of the Japanese Society of Snow and Ice 40: 60-63. https://doi.org/10.5331/seppyo.40.Special_60
  17. Takaya S. 2017. Facts of landcreep. Nokdo Publication. pp. 255.
  18. Tomio H.Z., Sohei, A., Takeshi, N. and Tosihiko, S.T. 1990. Landslide disaster in temanggung, Indonesia. Journal of the Japan Society of Erosion Control Engineering 42(6): 57-59.
  19. Varnes, D.J. 1978. Slope Movement Types and Processes. Transportation Research Board Special Report. pp.11-33.
  20. Woo, B.M. 1992. Erosion contron and conservation. Hayngmunsa. Seoul, Korea. pp. 310.
  21. Woo, B.M., Park, J.H., Choi, H.T., Jeon, G.S. and Kim, K.H. 1996. A study on the characteristics of the landslide in hyuseok-dong( I ) - topographical characteristics and surface displacement -. Journal of Korean Forest Society 85(4): 565-570.